What is public health advocacy? Australasian practitioner perspectives on defining the field and identifying effective practice and required competencies.
7 affiliations
- 1School of Health Sciences and Nursing, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, Sydney, NSW 2019, Australia.
- 2School of Health Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Level 6 North, Health Transition Hub, 55 Botany St Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia.
- 3School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Public Health Building, 288 Herston Rd, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia.
- 4School of Public Health, Adelaide University, Level 4, Rundle Mall Plaza, 50 Rundle Mall, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
- 5College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, 1 James Cook Drive, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia.
- 6School of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Level 5, Health Translation Hub, 55 Botany St. Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia.
- 7Health Protection NSW, NSW Health, 1 Reserve Rd, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia.
Abstract
Public health advocacy is a core function of public health practice, yet it remains underexamined, with limited consensus on its definition, effective strategies, and required competencies. This study explored public health advocacy practice among Australasian advocates, examining how advocacy is defined, which strategies are perceived as effective, and the competencies required for practice. Public health advocates completed an online survey between December 2024 and April 2025. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis. A total of 101 advocates completed the survey. Public health advocacy was commonly defined as an intentional, outcomes-focused practice that uses strategic actions to influence policy and practice to improve population health. Relationship building (59%), influencing decision makers (57%), and media use (46%) were identified as the most effective strategies. Reported barriers included inadequate organizational resourcing (funding 63%, time 61%, personnel 47%), limited access to decision makers (56%), organizational concerns about repercussions (39%), low priority (32%), and insufficient training (32%). Required competencies included contextual understanding of the health issue, policymaking literacy, knowledge of advocacy methods, and skills in communication, collaboration, research, and media engagement. Australasian advocates hold broadly consistent views of public health advocacy and identify key competencies and effective strategies. However, barriers related to capacity, organizational support, and evaluation processes continue to constrain practice. Strengthening workforce capability requires targeted education and training, greater organizational prioritization and resourcing of advocacy, and the development of strong relational networks with stakeholders and decision makers to enhance advocacy effectiveness. These findings have relevance beyond Australasia, particularly in comparable high-income democratic countries.
Related
- What and when: a Delphi study identifying AI competencies and learning objectives for medical students
- “Early and Often”: Practitioner Perspectives on Developing a Process for Consultation with Disabled Persons’ (Representative) Organisations (DP(R)O) in Active Travel
- Exploring Stakeholders' Perspectives on Required Nursing Competencies in Paediatric End‐of‐Life Care: A Qualitative Study
- Barriers to Effective Type 2 Diabetes Care in a Conflict-Affected Region of Syria: A Qualitative Study of Health Care Provider Perspectives
- Insights into the Huanglongbing defense responses in the Australasian citrus species
BibTeX
@article{bhatti2026what,
title = {{What is public health advocacy? Australasian practitioner perspectives on defining the field and identifying effective practice and required competencies.}},
author = {Alexandra J Bhatti and Sophia Lin and Katherine Cullerton and Dannielle Post and Nathan Dawes and Janaki Amin and Josephine Y Chau},
journal = {Health promotion international},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1093/heapro/daag150},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42904457},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - What is public health advocacy? Australasian practitioner perspectives on defining the field and identifying effective practice and required competencies.
AU - Alexandra J Bhatti
AU - Sophia Lin
AU - Katherine Cullerton
AU - Dannielle Post
AU - Nathan Dawes
AU - Janaki Amin
AU - Josephine Y Chau
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/01
JO - Health promotion international
DO - 10.1093/heapro/daag150
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42904457
AB - Public health advocacy is a core function of public health practice, yet it remains underexamined, with limited consensus on its definition, effective strategies, and required competencies. This study explored public health advocacy practice among Australasian advocates, examining how advocacy is defined, which strategies are perceived as effective, and the competencies required for practice. Public health advocates completed an online survey between December 2024 and April 2025. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis. A total of 101 advocates completed the survey. Public health advocacy was commonly defined as an intentional, outcomes-focused practice that uses strategic actions to influence policy and practice to improve population health. Relationship building (59%), influencing decision makers (57%), and media use (46%) were identified as the most effective strategies. Reported barriers included inadequate organizational resourcing (funding 63%, time 61%, personnel 47%), limited access to decision makers (56%), organizational concerns about repercussions (39%), low priority (32%), and insufficient training (32%). Required competencies included contextual understanding of the health issue, policymaking literacy, knowledge of advocacy methods, and skills in communication, collaboration, research, and media engagement. Australasian advocates hold broadly consistent views of public health advocacy and identify key competencies and effective strategies. However, barriers related to capacity, organizational support, and evaluation processes continue to constrain practice. Strengthening workforce capability requires targeted education and training, greater organizational prioritization and resourcing of advocacy, and the development of strong relational networks with stakeholders and decision makers to enhance advocacy effectiveness. These findings have relevance beyond Australasia, particularly in comparable high-income democratic countries.
SN - 0957-4824
SN - 1460-2245
ER -