Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 16 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo

LAB #4593 NEUTRAL: LEDGER BENCH: Apply filter: Quarterly phase = MANIPULATION — improves win rate from 31.5% to 32.3% ( — E8 Intelligence Research

  1. 1Independent Researcher, United Kingdom

Abstract

IDEA: Adjustment made to the live model — verify against the backtests: Apply filter: Quarterly phase = MANIPULATION — improves win rate from 31.5% to 32.3% (+0.8pp, n=1545)

SAME-WINDOW EFFECT: Applying the MANIPULATION-phase filter would have suppressed the three REJECTED/open trades (USDCHF LONG, EURJPY SHORT, AUDUSD LONG) — all currently unresolved, so no direct win/loss change yet. Among the seven closed trades, none fall into a clearly identified MANIPULATION phase based on the provided timestamps and entries, so the filter would not have altered any closed outcomes. Net PnL delta over this window is effectively zero, but it would have reduced open exposure by three positions, lowering risk without changing realized results. The +0.8pp backtest gain is not visible here due to the small sample and phase ambiguity.

OVER-TIME PROJECTION: Over 3–6 months, the filter could plausibly deliver a modest win-rate improvement if the backtest's phase classification is stable and not overfit

Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

Related

  1. LAB #4575 NEUTRAL: LEDGER BENCH: Apply filter: Quarterly phase = MANIPULATION — improves win rate from 31.6% to 32.3% ( — E8 Intelligence Research
    Andrew Stewart Caldin
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo
  2. LAB #4499 NEUTRAL: LEDGER BENCH: Apply filter: Quarterly phase = MANIPULATION — improves win rate from 31.6% to 32.4% ( — E8 Intelligence Research
    Andrew Stewart Caldin
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo
  3. LAB #4611 NEUTRAL: LEDGER BENCH: Apply filter: Quarterly phase = MANIPULATION — improves win rate from 32.2% to 33.1% ( — E8 Intelligence Research
    Andrew Stewart Caldin
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo
  4. LAB #4478 NEUTRAL: LEDGER BENCH: Apply filter: Quarterly phase = MANIPULATION — improves win rate from 31.5% to 32.3% ( — E8 Intelligence Research
    Andrew Stewart Caldin
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo
  5. LAB #4440 NEUTRAL: LEDGER BENCH: Apply filter: Quarterly phase = MANIPULATION — improves win rate from 31.5% to 32.3% ( — E8 Intelligence Research
    Andrew Stewart Caldin
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo
BibTeX
@misc{caldin20264593,
  title = {{LAB #4593 NEUTRAL: LEDGER BENCH: Apply filter: Quarterly phase = MANIPULATION — improves win rate from 31.5% to 32.3% ( — E8 Intelligence Research}},
  author = {Andrew Stewart Caldin},
  howpublished = {Zenodo},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23587134},
  url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23587134},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - LAB #4593 NEUTRAL: LEDGER BENCH: Apply filter: Quarterly phase = MANIPULATION — improves win rate from 31.5% to 32.3% ( — E8 Intelligence Research
AU  - Andrew Stewart Caldin
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
PB  - Zenodo
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.23587134
UR  - https://zenodo.org/records/23587134
AB  - IDEA: Adjustment made to the live model — verify against the backtests: Apply filter: Quarterly phase = MANIPULATION — improves win rate from 31.5% to 32.3% (+0.8pp, n=1545)  SAME-WINDOW EFFECT: Applying the MANIPULATION-phase filter would have suppressed the three REJECTED/open trades (USDCHF LONG, EURJPY SHORT, AUDUSD LONG) — all currently unresolved, so no direct win/loss change yet. Among the seven closed trades, none fall into a clearly identified MANIPULATION phase based on the provided timestamps and entries, so the filter would not have altered any closed outcomes. Net PnL delta over this window is effectively zero, but it would have reduced open exposure by three positions, lowering risk without changing realized results. The +0.8pp backtest gain is not visible here due to the small sample and phase ambiguity.  OVER-TIME PROJECTION: Over 3–6 months, the filter could plausibly deliver a modest win-rate improvement if the backtest's phase classification is stable and not overfit  Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
ER  -