Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 28 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Endocrinology

External validation reveals setting-dependent performance of TyG-related indices for HbA1c-defined prediabetes

  1. 1Laboratory Department, Pu’er Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Abstract

Background and objective: Prediabetes defined by glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) can occur despite fasting plasma glucose (FPG) below 100 mg/dL, leaving a discordant glycaemic phenotype that FPG-based pathways may miss. We investigated whether triglyceride–glucose (TyG)-related indices identify this phenotype and whether their comparative performance is maintained across populations.

Methods: We analysed fasting-subsample data from seven US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2005–2018) cycles and an independent health-examination cohort from Pu’er Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2020–2026). The primary index was TyG–waist-to-height ratio (TyG–WHtR). Survey-weighted and local regression models quantified adjusted associations. Candidate prediction models were benchmarked against related metabolic indices and a model retaining FPG, triglycerides and WHtR as separate terms. Repeated cross-validation was performed in NHANES, after which all fitted models, transformations and thresholds were frozen for external validation.

Results and conclusion: Among 6,930 eligible NHANES participants, 1,206 had HbA1c-defined prediabetes, corresponding to a weighted prevalence of 12.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), 11.7%–13.7%]. The local cohort included 10,791 participants and 1,139 outcomes. Each cohort-specific standard deviation increase in TyG–WHtR was associated with higher outcome prevalence in NHANES (prevalence ratio, 1.239; 95% CI, 1.158–1.326) and locally (1.482; 1.407–1.561). The raw-component model showed repeated internal validation (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.746), whereas the metabolic score for insulin resistance led to frozen external validation (0.710; 0.693–0.727). TyG–WHtR was reproducibly associated with the outcome but was not the strongest discriminator in either setting. The gains in discrimination were modest, and this cross-sectional validation does not establish clinical utility.

Related

  1. Machine learning models for identifying prediabetes: a systematic review of performance, validation, and implications for primary care
    Liang Wang, Yan Zhang, Hao Yang +3
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. External validation and comparative performance of four risk scores for acute kidney injury in critically ill adults
    Fangyan Liu, Linpei Jia, Jing Wang +6
    Renal failurePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Performance of the Expanded Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Score for Rheumatoid Arthritis: An External Validation of the BRASS Registry
    Misti L. Paudel, Katherine Liao, Jon T. Giles +8
    Arthritis care & researchPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textGeneral medicinePMC
  4. Diagnostic Performance of a Deep Learning Model Using Phonocardiogram and Single‐Lead ECG Signals for Detecting Moderate‐or‐Greater Aortic Stenosis: Multicenter External Validation
    Shumpei Saito, Masanobu Ishii, Shimpei Ogawa +21
    Clinical cardiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
  5. Development and internal validation of machine learning models for predicting prediabetes in China
    Zhengxin Jiang, Wen Qian, Haifang Yang +4
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biochemistryGeneral biologyPLOSPMC
BibTeX
@article{li2026external,
  title = {{External validation reveals setting-dependent performance of TyG-related indices for HbA1c-defined prediabetes}},
  author = {Fen Li and Yingjing Xie and Yu Chen and Zexiu Wang and Chunmei Rao and Jinliu Cheng and Tianwu Zhang and Jin Yuan},
  journal = {Frontiers in Endocrinology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fendo.2026.1961688},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2026.1961688/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - External validation reveals setting-dependent performance of TyG-related indices for HbA1c-defined prediabetes
AU  - Fen Li
AU  - Yingjing Xie
AU  - Yu Chen
AU  - Zexiu Wang
AU  - Chunmei Rao
AU  - Jinliu Cheng
AU  - Tianwu Zhang
AU  - Jin Yuan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/08
JO  - Frontiers in Endocrinology
DO  - 10.3389/fendo.2026.1961688
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2026.1961688/full
AB  - Background and objective: Prediabetes defined by glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) can occur despite fasting plasma glucose (FPG) below 100 mg/dL, leaving a discordant glycaemic phenotype that FPG-based pathways may miss. We investigated whether triglyceride–glucose (TyG)-related indices identify this phenotype and whether their comparative performance is maintained across populations.  Methods: We analysed fasting-subsample data from seven US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2005–2018) cycles and an independent health-examination cohort from Pu’er Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2020–2026). The primary index was TyG–waist-to-height ratio (TyG–WHtR). Survey-weighted and local regression models quantified adjusted associations. Candidate prediction models were benchmarked against related metabolic indices and a model retaining FPG, triglycerides and WHtR as separate terms. Repeated cross-validation was performed in NHANES, after which all fitted models, transformations and thresholds were frozen for external validation.  Results and conclusion: Among 6,930 eligible NHANES participants, 1,206 had HbA1c-defined prediabetes, corresponding to a weighted prevalence of 12.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), 11.7%–13.7%]. The local cohort included 10,791 participants and 1,139 outcomes. Each cohort-specific standard deviation increase in TyG–WHtR was associated with higher outcome prevalence in NHANES (prevalence ratio, 1.239; 95% CI, 1.158–1.326) and locally (1.482; 1.407–1.561). The raw-component model showed repeated internal validation (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.746), whereas the metabolic score for insulin resistance led to frozen external validation (0.710; 0.693–0.727). TyG–WHtR was reproducibly associated with the outcome but was not the strongest discriminator in either setting. The gains in discrimination were modest, and this cross-sectional validation does not establish clinical utility.
SN  - 1664-2392
ER  -