Artificial Intelligence Predicts Failure of Nonoperative Treatment in Degenerative Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears.
- 1Shoulder and Elbow Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz Universidad Autónoma Madrid Spain.
- 2Computer Engineering Department University of Murcia Murcia Spain.
Abstract
Purpose
To develop an artificial intelligence-based algorithm to predict success of nonoperative treatment in degenerative posterosuperior tears and to identify the most influential features.Methods
Patients with degenerative rotator cuff tears initially treated nonoperatively were enrolled prospectively from January 2022 to November 2024. Exclusion criteria included age >75 years; <24 months of follow-up; massive, traumatic, and partial tears; arthritic changes (Hamada >2); and severe fatty degeneration (Goutallier >2). All patients followed a standardized physiotherapy protocol and could choose surgery if symptoms persisted; failure was defined as opting for surgery. Collected variables included demographics, comorbidities (diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, hypothyroidism, and smoking), magnetic resonance imaging tear characteristics (size; International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery, and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine classification; associated cuff involvement; and biceps pathology), corticosteroid injection history, and functional scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Subjective Shoulder Value, and the visual analog scale). First, a standard statistical analysis between groups was performed. Later, the dataset was split into a train (80%) and test (20%), and a random forest algorithm model was developed. Finally, SHapley Additive exPlanations values were computed to assess feature importance.Results
Of the 412 patients enrolled, 347 patients met the inclusion criteria. After 24 months, 66 (19%) patients opted for surgery. Mean follow-up was 30.4 months (range, 24-32). Compared with the successful nonoperative treatment group, patients who failed treatment were younger (58.5 vs 64.6 years, P = .001) and had higher body mass index (28.8 vs 27.2, P = .016), greater subscapularis involvement (13.5% vs 3%, P = .042), higher visual analog scale scores (7.7 vs 7.2, P = .018), lower Subjective Shoulder Value (30.9 vs 38.9, P = .003), and lower American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (40.6 vs 47.1, P = .001). The model achieved an area under the curve of 84%, predicting success rate of the nonoperative treatment with 94% sensitivity, 62% specificity, 89% positive predictive value, and 77% negative predictive value. The most influential variables for the model were age, tear size, and pretreatment functional scores.Conclusions
The artificial intelligence-based algorithm accurately predicted nonoperative treatment outcomes in degenerative posterosuperior rotator cuff tears (area under the curve 0.84, sensitivity 94%). Age, tear size, and function were the main predictors.Level of evidence
Level IV, prognostic retrospective case series.
Related
- Tolerance for Adverse Events from Operative and Nonoperative Treatment for Mild Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
- Latissimus dorsi transfer or lower trapezius transfer: a treatment algorithm for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears muscles transfers in posterosuperior rotator cuff tears
- Artificial Intelligence in Gingival Recession Assessment and Treatment Planning: A Scoping Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Guided Extracellular Vesicle Platforms for Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Scoping Review and Future Directions
- Artificial Intelligence, Multi-Omics, and Multimodal Integration in Precision Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: From Biological Insights to Treatment Decisions
BibTeX
@article{gabardo2026artificial,
title = {{Artificial Intelligence Predicts Failure of Nonoperative Treatment in Degenerative Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears.}},
author = {Santiago Gabardo and Natalia Martínez-Catalán and José María Belmonte Martínez and Gregorio Bernabé García and José Manuel García Carrasco and Cristina Delgado and María Valencia-Mora and Gonzalo Luengo-Alonso and Emilio Calvo},
journal = {Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1002/ars2.70124},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42909187},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Artificial Intelligence Predicts Failure of Nonoperative Treatment in Degenerative Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears.
AU - Santiago Gabardo
AU - Natalia Martínez-Catalán
AU - José María Belmonte Martínez
AU - Gregorio Bernabé García
AU - José Manuel García Carrasco
AU - Cristina Delgado
AU - María Valencia-Mora
AU - Gonzalo Luengo-Alonso
AU - Emilio Calvo
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/20
JO - Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation
DO - 10.1002/ars2.70124
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42909187
AB - Purpose To develop an artificial intelligence-based algorithm to predict success of nonoperative treatment in degenerative posterosuperior tears and to identify the most influential features.Methods Patients with degenerative rotator cuff tears initially treated nonoperatively were enrolled prospectively from January 2022 to November 2024. Exclusion criteria included age >75 years; <24 months of follow-up; massive, traumatic, and partial tears; arthritic changes (Hamada >2); and severe fatty degeneration (Goutallier >2). All patients followed a standardized physiotherapy protocol and could choose surgery if symptoms persisted; failure was defined as opting for surgery. Collected variables included demographics, comorbidities (diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, hypothyroidism, and smoking), magnetic resonance imaging tear characteristics (size; International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery, and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine classification; associated cuff involvement; and biceps pathology), corticosteroid injection history, and functional scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Subjective Shoulder Value, and the visual analog scale). First, a standard statistical analysis between groups was performed. Later, the dataset was split into a train (80%) and test (20%), and a random forest algorithm model was developed. Finally, SHapley Additive exPlanations values were computed to assess feature importance.Results Of the 412 patients enrolled, 347 patients met the inclusion criteria. After 24 months, 66 (19%) patients opted for surgery. Mean follow-up was 30.4 months (range, 24-32). Compared with the successful nonoperative treatment group, patients who failed treatment were younger (58.5 vs 64.6 years, P = .001) and had higher body mass index (28.8 vs 27.2, P = .016), greater subscapularis involvement (13.5% vs 3%, P = .042), higher visual analog scale scores (7.7 vs 7.2, P = .018), lower Subjective Shoulder Value (30.9 vs 38.9, P = .003), and lower American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (40.6 vs 47.1, P = .001). The model achieved an area under the curve of 84%, predicting success rate of the nonoperative treatment with 94% sensitivity, 62% specificity, 89% positive predictive value, and 77% negative predictive value. The most influential variables for the model were age, tear size, and pretreatment functional scores.Conclusions The artificial intelligence-based algorithm accurately predicted nonoperative treatment outcomes in degenerative posterosuperior rotator cuff tears (area under the curve 0.84, sensitivity 94%). Age, tear size, and function were the main predictors.Level of evidence Level IV, prognostic retrospective case series.
SN - 2666-061X
ER -