Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCBleeding, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology

PO098 | REAL-WORLD EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT USE OF ANDEXANET ALFA FOR FACTOR XA INHIBITOR REVERSAL: AN ITALIAN COHORT

Abstract

Background and Aims. Andexanet alfa (AA) has been used for several years as a targeted reversal agent for factor Xa inhibitors in life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding. Observational studies had already identified an approximately 10% thrombotic-event risk, subsequently confirmed by ANNEXA-I trial, which also triggered a regulatory debate after withdrawal from the North American market. In Europe, however, AA remains authorised, and Italian emergency department (ED) data are scarce. We aimed to describe real-world ED use, safety and clinical profile of AA in patients requiring urgent reversal of factor Xa inhibitors. Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive DOAC-treated patients managed in the ED of Ospedale di Circolo (Varese) from january 2022 up to december 2025 and receiving a specific antidote as reversal agent. This analysis focuses on patients treated with AA. Demographic characteristics, indication for anticoagulation, bleeding site or procedural indication, timing of administration, dose, follow-up imaging, 30-day outcomes, thrombotic and recurrent bleeding events, anticoagulation resumption and mortality were collected. Results. Among 68 DOAC reversal cases using an antidote, 47 patients received AA. Median age was 80 years (IQR 76–86) and 26 patients (55.3%) were male. The reversed factor Xa inhibitor was apixaban in 30 cases (63.8%), rivaroxaban in 12 cases (25.5%) and edoxaban in 5 off-label cases (10.6%). Atrial fibrillation was the main indication for anticoagulation (40/47, 85.1%). Among patients with documented bleeding site, intracranial bleeding predominated (29/41, 70.7%), followed by gastrointestinal bleeding and other sites (6 cases each); 20 patients (42.6%) had a traumatic event. According to the primary indication, AA was used for life-threatening bleeding (41/47, 87.2%), whereas in 6 additional cases it was administered before urgent surgery in the absence of a documented active bleeding site, as off-label-use. Low-dose and high-dose regimens were used in 27 (57.4%) and 20 (42.6%) patients, respectively. Antidote administration occurred within 3 hours from ED access in 33/47 patients (70.2%). Red-cell transfusion was required in 11 patients (23.4%) and urgent surgery was indicated in 11 (23.4%). Follow-up imaging, when available, was stable or improved in 32/41 patients (78.0%). One recurrent bleeding event occurred within 30 days. Thrombotic events occurred at a mean of 4 days after AA administration and before anticoagulation resumption, with 4 events recorded among 43 evaluable patients (9.3%), consisting of 2 strokes, 1 myocardial infarction and 1 multiple site ischemia associated with endocarditis (one event occurred in an off-label use case). Overall mortality was 12/47 (25.5%). Anticoagulation was resumed in 23/46 evaluable patients (50.0%). Conclusions. In this Italian ED cohort, AA was used mainly in elderly, high-risk patients with factor Xa inhibitor–associated intracranial bleeding. The observed thrombotic-event rate was consistent with the known safety profile from observational studies and ANNEXA-I trial, without suggesting an unexpected safety signal. In a setting where European authorisation remains unchanged, these data support the continued, carefully selected ED use of AA as a potentially life-saving reversal strategy, while emphasizing the need for early reassessment of antithrombotic therapy, structured follow-up and larger Italian registries.

Related

  1. Major Bleeding During Factor Xa Inhibitor Therapy: Lessons from the Pre-Andexanet Era in Japan
    Manabu Minami
    Journal of Atherosclerosis and ThrombosisPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textCardiovascular medicineJ-STAGE
  2. Automated Calculation of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) Intra-Abdominal Injury Rule from Unstructured Emergency Department Notes Using a Large Language Model
    Leisha Devisetti, Belinda Chen, Newton Addo +5
    Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Emergency Department Management of Ankle Fractures: A Narrative Review
    Micah Ngatuvai, Francis Villarreal, Victor M Vasquez +3
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Antipsychotic-Induced Parkinsonism With Concurrent Benztropine-Associated Anticholinergic Effects in a Community Emergency Department Setting: A Case Report
    Colin Barnett, Manoj Sreedharan
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Emergency department medical care during civil unrest: thank you for looking at the eyes
    Anna Fierz
    Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{donadini2026po098,
  title = {{PO098 | REAL-WORLD EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT USE OF ANDEXANET ALFA FOR FACTOR XA INHIBITOR REVERSAL: AN ITALIAN COHORT}},
  author = {Marco Paolo Donadini},
  journal = {Bleeding, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  url = {https://www.btvb.org/btvb/article/view/914},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - PO098 | REAL-WORLD EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT USE OF ANDEXANET ALFA FOR FACTOR XA INHIBITOR REVERSAL: AN ITALIAN COHORT
AU  - Marco Paolo Donadini
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
JO  - Bleeding, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology
UR  - https://www.btvb.org/btvb/article/view/914
AB  - Background and Aims. Andexanet alfa (AA) has been used for several years as a targeted reversal agent for factor Xa inhibitors in life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding. Observational studies had already identified an approximately 10% thrombotic-event risk, subsequently confirmed by ANNEXA-I trial, which also triggered a regulatory debate after withdrawal from the North American market. In Europe, however, AA remains authorised, and Italian emergency department (ED) data are scarce. We aimed to describe real-world ED use, safety and clinical profile of AA in patients requiring urgent reversal of factor Xa inhibitors. Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive DOAC-treated patients managed in the ED of Ospedale di Circolo (Varese) from january 2022 up to december 2025 and receiving a specific antidote as reversal agent. This analysis focuses on patients treated with AA. Demographic characteristics, indication for anticoagulation, bleeding site or procedural indication, timing of administration, dose, follow-up imaging, 30-day outcomes, thrombotic and recurrent bleeding events, anticoagulation resumption and mortality were collected. Results. Among 68 DOAC reversal cases using an antidote, 47 patients received AA. Median age was 80 years (IQR 76–86) and 26 patients (55.3%) were male. The reversed factor Xa inhibitor was apixaban in 30 cases (63.8%), rivaroxaban in 12 cases (25.5%) and edoxaban in 5 off-label cases (10.6%). Atrial fibrillation was the main indication for anticoagulation (40/47, 85.1%). Among patients with documented bleeding site, intracranial bleeding predominated (29/41, 70.7%), followed by gastrointestinal bleeding and other sites (6 cases each); 20 patients (42.6%) had a traumatic event. According to the primary indication, AA was used for life-threatening bleeding (41/47, 87.2%), whereas in 6 additional cases it was administered before urgent surgery in the absence of a documented active bleeding site, as off-label-use. Low-dose and high-dose regimens were used in 27 (57.4%) and 20 (42.6%) patients, respectively. Antidote administration occurred within 3 hours from ED access in 33/47 patients (70.2%). Red-cell transfusion was required in 11 patients (23.4%) and urgent surgery was indicated in 11 (23.4%). Follow-up imaging, when available, was stable or improved in 32/41 patients (78.0%). One recurrent bleeding event occurred within 30 days. Thrombotic events occurred at a mean of 4 days after AA administration and before anticoagulation resumption, with 4 events recorded among 43 evaluable patients (9.3%), consisting of 2 strokes, 1 myocardial infarction and 1 multiple site ischemia associated with endocarditis (one event occurred in an off-label use case). Overall mortality was 12/47 (25.5%). Anticoagulation was resumed in 23/46 evaluable patients (50.0%). Conclusions. In this Italian ED cohort, AA was used mainly in elderly, high-risk patients with factor Xa inhibitor–associated intracranial bleeding. The observed thrombotic-event rate was consistent with the known safety profile from observational studies and ANNEXA-I trial, without suggesting an unexpected safety signal. In a setting where European authorisation remains unchanged, these data support the continued, carefully selected ED use of AA as a potentially life-saving reversal strategy, while emphasizing the need for early reassessment of antithrombotic therapy, structured follow-up and larger Italian registries.
SN  - 2785-5309
ER  -