Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 42 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCThe journal of advanced prosthodontics

The effect of intraoral scanner tip size and scanning strategy on the digital impression trueness of full-arch implant-supported prostheses: an in vitro study.

  1. 1Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of scanner head size, scanning path, and scanning strategy on the trueness of complete-arch digital implant impressions in an edentulous maxilla.Materials and methods

An edentulous maxillary model with four implants was digitized using a laboratory scanner to generate a reference dataset. Digital impressions were obtained using two scanner head sizes, two scanning paths, and three scanning strategies, resulting in twelve experimental groups, with ten scans for each group under standardized conditions. Root mean square and angular deviations between the reference dataset and each test scan were calculated using a best-fit algorithm. Statistical analysis was performed with the level of significance set at α = .05.Results

The highest median deviation was observed in the medium scanner head with the single scanning strategy group (M.I.S., 51.5 µm), whereas the lowest deviation was found in the large scanner head with the double scanning strategy group (L.P.D., 17.5 µm). All large-head scans showed significantly lower RMS and angular deviation values than the medium-head scans (P < .001). Among medium-head groups, the reverse double scan produced the lowest RMS values (M.I.R., 40.5 µm; M.P.R., 38 µm), while the single-scan groups showed the highest deviations (M.I.S., 51.5 µm; M.P.S., 49.5 µm). Scanning path showed no significant effect on trueness.Conclusion

Scanner head size and scanning strategy significantly affected trueness. Clinically, larger scanner heads combined with appropriate scanning strategies may improve trueness in full-arch or extended edentulous scans by reducing cumulative stitching errors.

Related

  1. Operators matter \textendash An assessment of the expectations, perceptions, and performance of dentists, postgraduate students, and dental prosthetist students using intraoral scanning
    Khaled E. Ahmed, Karen G. Peres, Marco A. Peres +3
    Journal of DentistryPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text14 citedGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  2. Clinical Performance and Survival Outcomes of All-on-4 Full-Arch Implant-Supported Prostheses in Patients With a Completely Edentulous Arch: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Jay Gohil, Mohammed Taslim Fathima, Dilip Chakravarthy +3
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Interocclusal Recording for Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses: Current Materials, Clinical Techniques and Digital Workflows.
    Nezha Ben El Hammi, Iman Ihoum, Abdallah Mouhibi
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  4. Zirconia-based versus metal-framework veneered complete-arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review of comparative clinical studies with integrated cost-effectiveness analysis
    E. Coote, N. Patel, R. Vijayanarayanan
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textGeneral medicinemedRxiv
  5. Effect of Laser Fluence and Scanning Strategy on Topography and Morphology of Femtosecond Laser-Structured Stainless-Steel Surfaces
    Robert Thomas, Timo Block, Hermann Seitz +1
    MicromachinesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{ozturk2026effect,
  title = {{The effect of intraoral scanner tip size and scanning strategy on the digital impression trueness of full-arch implant-supported prostheses: an in vitro study.}},
  author = {Aslıhan Öztürk and Ahmet Atila Ertan},
  journal = {The journal of advanced prosthodontics},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.4047/jap.2026.18.5.461},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42948849},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The effect of intraoral scanner tip size and scanning strategy on the digital impression trueness of full-arch implant-supported prostheses: an in vitro study.
AU  - Aslıhan Öztürk
AU  - Ahmet Atila Ertan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/13
JO  - The journal of advanced prosthodontics
DO  - 10.4047/jap.2026.18.5.461
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42948849
AB  - Purpose  The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of scanner head size, scanning path, and scanning strategy on the trueness of complete-arch digital implant impressions in an edentulous maxilla.Materials and methods  An edentulous maxillary model with four implants was digitized using a laboratory scanner to generate a reference dataset. Digital impressions were obtained using two scanner head sizes, two scanning paths, and three scanning strategies, resulting in twelve experimental groups, with ten scans for each group under standardized conditions. Root mean square and angular deviations between the reference dataset and each test scan were calculated using a best-fit algorithm. Statistical analysis was performed with the level of significance set at α = .05.Results  The highest median deviation was observed in the medium scanner head with the single scanning strategy group (M.I.S., 51.5 µm), whereas the lowest deviation was found in the large scanner head with the double scanning strategy group (L.P.D., 17.5 µm). All large-head scans showed significantly lower RMS and angular deviation values than the medium-head scans (P < .001). Among medium-head groups, the reverse double scan produced the lowest RMS values (M.I.R., 40.5 µm; M.P.R., 38 µm), while the single-scan groups showed the highest deviations (M.I.S., 51.5 µm; M.P.S., 49.5 µm). Scanning path showed no significant effect on trueness.Conclusion  Scanner head size and scanning strategy significantly affected trueness. Clinically, larger scanner heads combined with appropriate scanning strategies may improve trueness in full-arch or extended edentulous scans by reducing cumulative stitching errors.
SN  - 2005-7806
SN  - 2005-7814
ER  -