Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 11 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDJournal of evaluation in clinical practice

How Patients' Inquiry Shapes Meaning in Primary Care Consultations: A Qualitative Study Using Own-Point-of-View Video-Stimulated Recall.

5 affiliations
  1. 1Interuniversity Laboratory of Education and Communication Sciences (LISEC, EA 2310), Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
  2. 2Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Paris Cité University, Paris, France.
  3. 3Unit for Education and Research in Health (UPPERS, US 007), Faculty of Health, Paris Cité University, Paris, France.
  4. 4Prehospital Emergency Care Service (SAMU 67), Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
  5. 5Centre for Training and Research in Health Sciences Education (CFRPS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

Abstract

Rationale

Medical consultations are collaborative encounters in which physicians and patients jointly address health concerns and make decisions. While most research has focused on physicians' clinical reasoning, decision-making is increasingly viewed as a form of situated cognition, distributed across individuals and their interactions. However, the patient's perspective on how they make sense of their health problems remains underexamined.Aim and objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate how patients experience and make sense of their health problems before and during a primary care consultation.Methods

We conducted video-stimulated recall interviews with patients after their consultations. Consultations were recorded from the patient's perspective using wearable camera glasses. Each interview comprised two parts: (a) an explicitation interview exploring the patient's experience and reasoning before the consultation, and (b) a video-based stimulated recall to analyze their experience during the consultation. We performed an abductive thematic analysis using Dewey's theory of inquiry.Results

Twelve interviews were analyzed. Patients engaged in an inquiry process before the consultation, involving the identification of a problematic situation, hypothesis generation and the exploration of potential actions and interactions. During the consultation, patients interpreted the physician's messages as confirmations, refinements or refutations of their own hypotheses. They attempted to infer the physician's reasoning and its underlying assumptions. Patients' acceptance and integration of medical explanations depended on the coherence between these explanations and the trajectory of their own inquiry.Conclusion

Patients interpret the physician's messages in light of their own inquiry, which can be described according to John Dewey's pattern of inquiry. The physician's ability to recognize where the patient stands within their inquiry and to make clinical reasoning explicit appears central to knowledge sharing and decision-making. These findings suggest new orientations for communication training in primary care, emphasizing physicians' capacity to identify and support patients' inquiry processes.

Related

  1. Experiences of palliative care for patients with pulmonary fibrosis: A qualitative exploration of patients and partners perspectives
    Lian Trapman, Lea M. Dijksman, Jan C. Grutters +2
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textDevelopmental biologyPLOS
  2. Experiences of self-management behaviors during adaptation to permanent enterostomy among older patients: A qualitative study
    Zhichao Duan, Fang Wu
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceOncologyPLOSEurope PMCPMC
  3. Mindscapes of Second Language Acquisition: A New Perspective on the Cognitive Inquiry of Language
    JUNYA FUKUTA
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceOSF
  4. Patients as Co‐Researchers in Oncology: A Qualitative Exploration of Participatory Governance
    Yaël Busnel, Aline Rollet, Aline Cristiani +3
    Health ExpectationsPeer-reviewedCC BYGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  5. Experiences towards endometriosis management: A qualitative study among patients and healthcare professionals
    Domitille Le Quéré, Manon Verroul, Agathe Thierry +6
    Patient Education and CounselingPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL
BibTeX
@article{jaunay2026patients,
  title = {{How Patients' Inquiry Shapes Meaning in Primary Care Consultations: A Qualitative Study Using Own-Point-of-View Video-Stimulated Recall.}},
  author = {Louis-Baptiste Jaunay and Anne-Sophie Ivanoff and Corentin Philippot and Emmanuel Triby and Thierry Pelaccia},
  journal = {Journal of evaluation in clinical practice},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1111/jep.70653},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42900758},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - How Patients' Inquiry Shapes Meaning in Primary Care Consultations: A Qualitative Study Using Own-Point-of-View Video-Stimulated Recall.
AU  - Louis-Baptiste Jaunay
AU  - Anne-Sophie Ivanoff
AU  - Corentin Philippot
AU  - Emmanuel Triby
AU  - Thierry Pelaccia
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
DO  - 10.1111/jep.70653
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42900758
AB  - Rationale  Medical consultations are collaborative encounters in which physicians and patients jointly address health concerns and make decisions. While most research has focused on physicians' clinical reasoning, decision-making is increasingly viewed as a form of situated cognition, distributed across individuals and their interactions. However, the patient's perspective on how they make sense of their health problems remains underexamined.Aim and objectives  The aim of this study was to investigate how patients experience and make sense of their health problems before and during a primary care consultation.Methods  We conducted video-stimulated recall interviews with patients after their consultations. Consultations were recorded from the patient's perspective using wearable camera glasses. Each interview comprised two parts: (a) an explicitation interview exploring the patient's experience and reasoning before the consultation, and (b) a video-based stimulated recall to analyze their experience during the consultation. We performed an abductive thematic analysis using Dewey's theory of inquiry.Results  Twelve interviews were analyzed. Patients engaged in an inquiry process before the consultation, involving the identification of a problematic situation, hypothesis generation and the exploration of potential actions and interactions. During the consultation, patients interpreted the physician's messages as confirmations, refinements or refutations of their own hypotheses. They attempted to infer the physician's reasoning and its underlying assumptions. Patients' acceptance and integration of medical explanations depended on the coherence between these explanations and the trajectory of their own inquiry.Conclusion  Patients interpret the physician's messages in light of their own inquiry, which can be described according to John Dewey's pattern of inquiry. The physician's ability to recognize where the patient stands within their inquiry and to make clinical reasoning explicit appears central to knowledge sharing and decision-making. These findings suggest new orientations for communication training in primary care, emphasizing physicians' capacity to identify and support patients' inquiry processes.
SN  - 1356-1294
SN  - 1365-2753
ER  -