Diagnostic Utility of Multi-Domain Language Measures Across the Alzheimer Disease Continuum
- 1McGill University
Abstract
ObjectivesAlzheimers disease (AD) progresses from a cognitively unimpaired stage through mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to dementia. Because language impairment often emerges before dementia, it is a candidate marker of disease stage. Yet the standard batteries of large AD research cohorts rely on a narrow set of tests that mainly evaluate the lexical-semantic domain (i.e., picture naming and verbal fluency), leaving other language domains, such as semantic memory, phonology, morphosyntax, and single-word reading, rarely assessed. We evaluated the diagnostic utility of standard and specialized language tests for distinguishing amyloid-positive MCI and dementia of the Alzheimers type (DAT) from healthy controls (HC) and from each other.
MethodsWe included 286 participants from the National Alzheimers Coordinating Center (125 HC, 53 MCI A{beta}+, 108 DAT A{beta}+) assessed with three standard tests from UDSv3 (semantic fluency, letter fluency, and Multilingual Naming Test [MINT]) and nine specialized tests from the FTLD Module (regular and irregular word reading, semantic word-picture matching, semantic associates, Northwestern Anagram Test - Short Form [NAT-S], Northwestern Naming Battery noun and verb naming, sentence repetition, and sentence reading). For each test, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was computed for DAT vs. HC, MCI vs. HC, and DAT vs. MCI, and AUCs were compared between tests with DeLongs test.
ResultsEight of 12 measures reached acceptable discrimination (AUC [≥] .700) for DAT vs. HC, five for MCI vs. HC, but only semantic fluency and NAT-S for DAT vs. MCI. Semantic fluency showed the highest discrimination in each contrast, though it did not significantly outperform the NAT-S for MCI vs. HC or DAT vs. MCI. MINT, letter fluency, and irregular word reading reached clinically meaningful accuracy in distinguishing MCI and DAT from HC, but not DAT from MCI. The remaining specialized tests reached it only for DAT vs. HC, or not at all. In a post hoc regression, adjusting for cognitive flexibility and working memory attenuated group differences; the DAT difference was no longer significant, whereas the MCI difference remained significant.
DiscussionSemantic fluency was the strongest single language marker across the AD continuum. Among specialized tests, NAT-S was the most informative, challenging the view that syntax is spared in early AD. Its performance was partly explained by executive function, mainly in DAT, whereas a residual morphosyntactic component remained in MCI, and several specialized tests were limited by ceiling effects. Clinically, the NAT-S may complement semantic fluency for staging, and specialized tests may help characterize heterogeneous language profiles in MCI and DAT.
Related
- The entorhinal cortex atrophy score for diagnostic distinction between phases of the Alzheimer's disease continuum
- Clinical Utility of Aerodynamic Measures in Vocal Fold Augmentation Outcomes
- Examining the Clinical Utility of Deep Learning Models for Perivascular Space Segmentation in Alzheimer's Disease
- Vascular brain injury modifies the relationship between sleep duration, cognition, and white matter hyperintensity burden in the Alzheimer's disease continuum
- OA13 Diagnostic utility of vessel-wall MRI in giant cell arteritis-associated anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy
BibTeX
@misc{geng2026diagnostic,
title = {{Diagnostic Utility of Multi-Domain Language Measures Across the Alzheimer Disease Continuum}},
author = {Z. Geng and M. Montembeault and V. Coulombe},
howpublished = {medRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.64898/2026.09.28.26364143},
url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.28.26364143v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Diagnostic Utility of Multi-Domain Language Measures Across the Alzheimer Disease Continuum
AU - Z. Geng
AU - M. Montembeault
AU - V. Coulombe
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/28
PB - medRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.09.28.26364143
UR - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.28.26364143v1
AB - ObjectivesAlzheimers disease (AD) progresses from a cognitively unimpaired stage through mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to dementia. Because language impairment often emerges before dementia, it is a candidate marker of disease stage. Yet the standard batteries of large AD research cohorts rely on a narrow set of tests that mainly evaluate the lexical-semantic domain (i.e., picture naming and verbal fluency), leaving other language domains, such as semantic memory, phonology, morphosyntax, and single-word reading, rarely assessed. We evaluated the diagnostic utility of standard and specialized language tests for distinguishing amyloid-positive MCI and dementia of the Alzheimers type (DAT) from healthy controls (HC) and from each other. MethodsWe included 286 participants from the National Alzheimers Coordinating Center (125 HC, 53 MCI A{beta}+, 108 DAT A{beta}+) assessed with three standard tests from UDSv3 (semantic fluency, letter fluency, and Multilingual Naming Test [MINT]) and nine specialized tests from the FTLD Module (regular and irregular word reading, semantic word-picture matching, semantic associates, Northwestern Anagram Test - Short Form [NAT-S], Northwestern Naming Battery noun and verb naming, sentence repetition, and sentence reading). For each test, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was computed for DAT vs. HC, MCI vs. HC, and DAT vs. MCI, and AUCs were compared between tests with DeLongs test. ResultsEight of 12 measures reached acceptable discrimination (AUC [≥] .700) for DAT vs. HC, five for MCI vs. HC, but only semantic fluency and NAT-S for DAT vs. MCI. Semantic fluency showed the highest discrimination in each contrast, though it did not significantly outperform the NAT-S for MCI vs. HC or DAT vs. MCI. MINT, letter fluency, and irregular word reading reached clinically meaningful accuracy in distinguishing MCI and DAT from HC, but not DAT from MCI. The remaining specialized tests reached it only for DAT vs. HC, or not at all. In a post hoc regression, adjusting for cognitive flexibility and working memory attenuated group differences; the DAT difference was no longer significant, whereas the MCI difference remained significant. DiscussionSemantic fluency was the strongest single language marker across the AD continuum. Among specialized tests, NAT-S was the most informative, challenging the view that syntax is spared in early AD. Its performance was partly explained by executive function, mainly in DAT, whereas a residual morphosyntactic component remained in MCI, and several specialized tests were limited by ceiling effects. Clinically, the NAT-S may complement semantic fluency for staging, and specialized tests may help characterize heterogeneous language profiles in MCI and DAT.
ER -