Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,123 studies31 sourcesUpdated 6 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Ecosystem Services

A global synthesis of ecosystem services records and their associations with marine and coastal habitats

1 more authors

Abstract

Marine and coastal ecosystems are rapidly degrading, compromising the supply of ecosystem services critical to human well-being. Addressing this crisis requires understanding how marine and coastal ecosystems underpin these services. However, marine and coastal ecosystems remain underrepresented in ecosystem services research, with available information fragmented and scattered. We conducted a systematic literature review on marine and coastal ecosystem services and their association with habitats, following the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES). We analysed 3316 records from 139 countries, spanning 21 classes of regulating and maintenance (1323), provisioning (1153) and cultural (840) services. Research on marine ecosystem services has surged since 2008, with most records from Asia (29%), North America (21%) and Europe (15%). Provisioning services focused on seafood provision (wild: 66%, aquaculture: 24%), whereas regulating services were predominantly related to waste removal and storage (35%), coastal protection (30%) and lifecycle maintenance (20%). Cultural services centred on recreation and tourism (71%). Approximately half of the records linked ecosystem services with specific habitats. Mangroves, seagrasses and coral reefs were the most studied (31–14%) and were associated with nearly all services (19–17 classes). Other habitats, including pelagic zones, kelp forests, continental shelves, intertidal mudflats, deep sea and sea ice, were underrepresented (6–1%), and generally linked to fewer services (10–6). Knowledge gaps persist in the Southern Hemisphere, and mainly for services such as energy provision, sediment regulation and biological control. Addressing these gaps, and expanding research on understudied habitats, ecosystem disservices, service interactions and habitat condition, is urgent to inform marine and coastal conservation and management.

Related

  1. Effects of climate change and anthropogenic pressure on water resources and ecosystem services in a high-elevation Andean socio-ecosystem (Katari basin, Lake Titicaca, Bolivia): A synthesis
    Stéphane Guédron, Dario Acha, Jorge Molina-Carpio +24
    Science of the Total EnvironmentPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  2. Predicaments in the collaborative management of farmland ecosystem services amid land circulation
    Yajuan Chen, Sirui Bai, Yaofeng Yang +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textClimate scienceCrossref
  3. Machine learning and spatial regression approaches to estimating willingness to pay for ecosystem services in Jakarta and Taoyuan
    Shafira Wuryandani, Yu-Pin Lin, Pei-Chen Lin +2
    Ecosystem ServicesPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull text3 citedEcologyEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  4. Replacing external inputs with ecosystem services to produce lamb meat can increase exposure to ecosystem disservices
    Frédéric Joly, Marc Benoit, Bertrand Dumont
    Renewable Agriculture and Food SystemsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textClimate scienceHAL
  5. Blue carbon development and ecosystem services in oligotrophic environments: the case for a shallow coastal installation on the shelf off Tenerife (Canary Islands)
    Juan Usó-Canós, Enrique Isla, Isabelle Peeters +1
    Ocean SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Oceanography & cryosphereCrossref
BibTeX
@article{martelo2026global,
  title = {{A global synthesis of ecosystem services records and their associations with marine and coastal habitats}},
  author = {Joana Martelo and Sandra A Ferreira and Ronaldo Sousa and Sílvia B Carvalho and Manuel Hidalgo and Henrique Cabral and Marina Dolbeth and Martin Lindegren and Ana Veríssimo and Anne E Magurran and Bernardo Duarte and Sofia Henriques and Rita P Vasconcelos},
  journal = {Ecosystem Services},
  year = {2026},
  month = may,
  doi = {10.1016/j.ecoser.2026.101861},
  url = {https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05769327v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - A global synthesis of ecosystem services records and their associations with marine and coastal habitats
AU  - Joana Martelo
AU  - Sandra A Ferreira
AU  - Ronaldo Sousa
AU  - Sílvia B Carvalho
AU  - Manuel Hidalgo
AU  - Henrique Cabral
AU  - Marina Dolbeth
AU  - Martin Lindegren
AU  - Ana Veríssimo
AU  - Anne E Magurran
AU  - Bernardo Duarte
AU  - Sofia Henriques
AU  - Rita P Vasconcelos
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/05/22
JO  - Ecosystem Services
DO  - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2026.101861
UR  - https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05769327v1
AB  - Marine and coastal ecosystems are rapidly degrading, compromising the supply of ecosystem services critical to human well-being. Addressing this crisis requires understanding how marine and coastal ecosystems underpin these services. However, marine and coastal ecosystems remain underrepresented in ecosystem services research, with available information fragmented and scattered. We conducted a systematic literature review on marine and coastal ecosystem services and their association with habitats, following the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES). We analysed 3316 records from 139 countries, spanning 21 classes of regulating and maintenance (1323), provisioning (1153) and cultural (840) services. Research on marine ecosystem services has surged since 2008, with most records from Asia (29%), North America (21%) and Europe (15%). Provisioning services focused on seafood provision (wild: 66%, aquaculture: 24%), whereas regulating services were predominantly related to waste removal and storage (35%), coastal protection (30%) and lifecycle maintenance (20%). Cultural services centred on recreation and tourism (71%). Approximately half of the records linked ecosystem services with specific habitats. Mangroves, seagrasses and coral reefs were the most studied (31–14%) and were associated with nearly all services (19–17 classes). Other habitats, including pelagic zones, kelp forests, continental shelves, intertidal mudflats, deep sea and sea ice, were underrepresented (6–1%), and generally linked to fewer services (10–6). Knowledge gaps persist in the Southern Hemisphere, and mainly for services such as energy provision, sediment regulation and biological control. Addressing these gaps, and expanding research on understudied habitats, ecosystem disservices, service interactions and habitat condition, is urgent to inform marine and coastal conservation and management.
SN  - 2212-0416
ER  -