Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,226 studies31 sourcesUpdated 21 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYActa Odontologica Scandinavica

Prevalence and morphological types of middle mesial canals in mandibular molars according to the Barros-Costa classification: a CBCT study in a Turkish subpopulation

  1. 1Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Biruni University, Istanbul, Turkey
  2. 2Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, İstanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and configurations of middle mesial canals (MMCs) in a Turkish subpopulation using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) according to the Barros-Costa classification.

Materials and methods: Two experienced endodontists assessed the prevalence of MMCs in mandibular molars of 213 Turkish patients aged 18–65 years (111 females, 102 males). MMCs were categorized using the Barros-Costa classification based on their association with the mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals using CBCT scans in all three planes. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used for unadjusted comparisons (p < 0.05). A multivariable generalized estimating equations (GEE) model with patient ID as the clustering variable was used to assess the associations between MMC presence and tooth type, age, and sex.

Results: Of 589 mandibular molars evaluated, 12.4% had an MMC. Distribution was: mesiolingual confluent (43.8%), mesiobuccal confluent (24.7%), independent (23.3%), and confluent (8.2%). MMCs were significantly more frequent in mandibular first molars (20.6%) than in second molars (6.6%) (p < 0.001). The most frequently observed MMC type was the mesiolingual confluent. In the multivariable GEE analysis, mandibular first molars had significantly higher odds of presenting an MMC than second molars (adjusted odds ratio = 3.54, 95% confidence interval: 2.16–5.80, p < 0.001), whereas age and sex were not significantly associated with MMC presence.

Conclusions: Within the examined single-center Turkish subpopulation and under the specific CBCT acquisition protocol used, MMCs were detected more frequently in mandibular first molars than in second molars. The mesiolingual confluent configuration was the most frequently observed morphological type. These findings highlight the anatomical variability of MMCs and support careful assessment of the mesial root canal system during endodontic treatment.

Related

  1. Association of Mandibular Morphological and Trabecular Bone Characteristics with Long-Term Outcomes Following First Permanent Molar Extraction: A Retrospective Study
    Aybike Bas Ozturk, Gelengul Urvasizoglu, Rama Abdulkader +2
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Morphological and vascular assessment of mandibular nutrient foramina using cone beam computed tomography and Color Doppler ultrasonography
    Menduh Sercan Kaya, Mehmet Emin Doğan, Sedef Kotanlı
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefDOAJ
  3. Relationships among morphological variables, cardiovascular fitness during exercise, and thermo-physiological responses under passive heat stress according to Sasang typology.
    Andrew Gorski, Sang-Hyun Roh, Joo-Young Lee
    Journal of physiological anthropologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPhysiologyEurope PMCPMC
  4. Genetic control of bone marrow transplantation in irradiated mice: classification of mouse strains according to their responsiveness to bone marrow allografts and xenografts
    Eva Lotzová, Dicke Ka, John J. Trentin +1
    PubMedPeer-reviewedLicence not stated18 citedGeneral medicineOpenAlex
  5. Three-dimensional morphological analysis of 67 primary mandibular first molars based on CBCT reconstructions.
    Kefan Li, Jie Bai, Aonan Wen +4
    BMC oral healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{sezgin2026prevalence,
  title = {{Prevalence and morphological types of middle mesial canals in mandibular molars according to the Barros-Costa classification: a CBCT study in a Turkish subpopulation}},
  author = {Güzide Pelin Sezgin and Tuna Kaplan and Sema Sönmez Kaplan and Hatice Sağlam and Nuri Yeniev and Metahir Uğur Marangoz and Başak Mina Çelik Akdaş},
  journal = {Acta Odontologica Scandinavica},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.2340/aos.v85.47151},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v85.47151},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Prevalence and morphological types of middle mesial canals in mandibular molars according to the Barros-Costa classification: a CBCT study in a Turkish subpopulation
AU  - Güzide Pelin Sezgin
AU  - Tuna Kaplan
AU  - Sema Sönmez Kaplan
AU  - Hatice Sağlam
AU  - Nuri Yeniev
AU  - Metahir Uğur Marangoz
AU  - Başak Mina Çelik Akdaş
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/06
JO  - Acta Odontologica Scandinavica
DO  - 10.2340/aos.v85.47151
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v85.47151
AB  - Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and configurations of middle mesial canals (MMCs) in a Turkish subpopulation using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) according to the Barros-Costa classification.  Materials and methods: Two experienced endodontists assessed the prevalence of MMCs in mandibular molars of 213 Turkish patients aged 18–65 years (111 females, 102 males). MMCs were categorized using the Barros-Costa classification based on their association with the mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals using CBCT scans in all three planes. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used for unadjusted comparisons (p < 0.05). A multivariable generalized estimating equations (GEE) model with patient ID as the clustering variable was used to assess the associations between MMC presence and tooth type, age, and sex.  Results: Of 589 mandibular molars evaluated, 12.4% had an MMC. Distribution was: mesiolingual confluent (43.8%), mesiobuccal confluent (24.7%), independent (23.3%), and confluent (8.2%). MMCs were significantly more frequent in mandibular first molars (20.6%) than in second molars (6.6%) (p < 0.001). The most frequently observed MMC type was the mesiolingual confluent. In the multivariable GEE analysis, mandibular first molars had significantly higher odds of presenting an MMC than second molars (adjusted odds ratio = 3.54, 95% confidence interval: 2.16–5.80, p < 0.001), whereas age and sex were not significantly associated with MMC presence.  Conclusions: Within the examined single-center Turkish subpopulation and under the specific CBCT acquisition protocol used, MMCs were detected more frequently in mandibular first molars than in second molars. The mesiolingual confluent configuration was the most frequently observed morphological type. These findings highlight the anatomical variability of MMCs and support careful assessment of the mesial root canal system during endodontic treatment.
SN  - 0001-6357
SN  - 1502-3850
ER  -