The 2025.6 X-ray Minimum of Eta Carinae
Abstract
We present observations of the recent 2025.6 X-ray minimum and recovery of η~Carinae, obtained with NICER/XTI, Swift/XRT, XRISM/Xtend, and Chandra/HRC-I. We construct light curves in the soft (0.5--2 keV) and hard (2--10 keV) bands and derive hardness ratios. The X-ray emission reached its minimum about 10 days earlier than in the previous five cycles. As in previous events, the spectrum softened during the decline, while the X-ray luminosity varied on short timescales. These findings strengthen the conclusion that enhanced line-of-sight absorption, such as that expected during an eclipse, does not have a significant role in producing the spectroscopic event. Instead, they indicate that the X-ray decline is caused by stochastic variations and instabilities in the two stellar winds and their interaction, destruction of the colliding winds region, and accretion of primary wind onto the secondary. The main process behind the deep X-ray minimum near periastron is the accretion of mass lost by the primary star onto the secondary star. Accretion at periastron passages in η Carinae implies that accretion occurred at much higher rates during the nineteenth-century Great and Lesser Eruptions, when the primary star lost mass at much higher rates. Such accretion likely launches jets. The broader implication is that accretion events in binary systems, possibly with jet launching, power other luminous blue variable giant eruptions and intermediate-luminosity optical transients.
Related
- Minimum lifetime of a black hole
- Phase Offsets Between the Minimum Light and Radial Velocity in Long Secondary Period Stars
- How Low Can We Go? Minimum Spectroscopic Requirements For Supernova Subtype Classification
- XMST: An Extended Minimum Spanning Tree Framework with Objective Fracture-Scale Selection
- Circumbinary planets in coplanar triple-star systems: I. Minimum eccentricity variation region
BibTeX
@misc{kashi202620256,
title = {{The 2025.6 X-ray Minimum of Eta Carinae}},
author = {Amit Kashi and Noam Soker},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.20046},
eprint = {2609.20046},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20046},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - The 2025.6 X-ray Minimum of Eta Carinae
AU - Amit Kashi
AU - Noam Soker
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/17
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.20046
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20046
AB - We present observations of the recent 2025.6 X-ray minimum and recovery of η~Carinae, obtained with NICER/XTI, Swift/XRT, XRISM/Xtend, and Chandra/HRC-I. We construct light curves in the soft (0.5--2 keV) and hard (2--10 keV) bands and derive hardness ratios. The X-ray emission reached its minimum about 10 days earlier than in the previous five cycles. As in previous events, the spectrum softened during the decline, while the X-ray luminosity varied on short timescales. These findings strengthen the conclusion that enhanced line-of-sight absorption, such as that expected during an eclipse, does not have a significant role in producing the spectroscopic event. Instead, they indicate that the X-ray decline is caused by stochastic variations and instabilities in the two stellar winds and their interaction, destruction of the colliding winds region, and accretion of primary wind onto the secondary. The main process behind the deep X-ray minimum near periastron is the accretion of mass lost by the primary star onto the secondary star. Accretion at periastron passages in η Carinae implies that accretion occurred at much higher rates during the nineteenth-century Great and Lesser Eruptions, when the primary star lost mass at much higher rates. Such accretion likely launches jets. The broader implication is that accretion events in binary systems, possibly with jet launching, power other luminous blue variable giant eruptions and intermediate-luminosity optical transients.
ER -