Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
178,970 studies31 sourcesUpdated 41 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Clinical Medicine

Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Contemporary Salvage Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Failed Primary Therapy: A Single Institution Review

  1. 1Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA
  2. 2Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC 27517, USA

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP) is a potentially curative option for recurrent localized prostate cancer after primary radiation or focal therapy, historically limited by technical complexity and poor functional outcomes. This study characterizes contemporary perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes of salvage robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (sRARP) at a single institution over two decades. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing SRP from 01/01/2004 to 06/30/2026, identified via institutional database queries and natural language processing keyword searches with chart confirmation; analysis was restricted to the robotic-assisted subset. Complications within 90 days were graded by the Clavien–Dindo classification. Biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) required freedom from PSA persistence and recurrence (PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL, with biochemical recurrence documented in the medical record) and is reported as a proportion. Results: Of 4002 records identified, 30 patients met inclusion criteria; 24 (80%) underwent sRARP. Extraprostatic disease was present in 54% (13/24) and positive margins in 43% (10/23). Within 90 days, 43% (10/23) had a complication (13% grade ≥ III); 30% (7/23) had a later complication, and 4% (1/24) required later urinary diversion. At a median follow-up of 32.1 months, bRFS was 39% (9/23), and 33% (8/24) had PSA persistence. Incontinence rose from 18% (3/17) at diagnosis to 87% (20/23) post-SRP; at longer-term follow-up (27.3 months), 79% (11/14) used ≥1 pad/day. Erectile dysfunction was present in 82% (14/17) at 22.0 months. Additional cancer-directed therapy was given in 50% (12/24). Conclusions: In this small, descriptive series, sRARP was feasible, but only 39% of patients were free of biochemical recurrence and functional burden was substantial. sRARP may represent a treatment option for carefully selected patients with recurrent localized prostate cancer; however, individualized counseling and further multicenter evaluation are essential.

Related

  1. Risk‐Stratified Bilateral Tonsillectomy for Unilateral HPV‐Associated Tonsillar SCC: Oncologic and Functional Outcomes From a Single Institution
    Tereza Vitkovska, Crystal Z. Zhou, Ishna Pandey +6
    Laryngoscope Investigative OtolaryngologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaDOAJ
  2. Impact of prolonged balloon inflation on valve expansion and early clinical outcomes following contemporary balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation
    Francesco Cardaioli, Luca Nai Fovino, Tommaso Fabris +6
    EuroInterventionPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text1 citedCardiovascular medicinePMC
  3. Oncological and functional outcomes of focal irreversible electroporation for localised prostate cancer: a single institution series of 171 cases
    Z. Mian, T. Gianduzzo, B. Kua +1
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic DiseasesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  4. Contemporary Clinical Outcomes and Healthcare Utilization in Older Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Insights from a Single-Center Retrospective Cohort
    Tina Y. Zhang, Alex Y. Ge, Shyam A. Patel +6
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMCCrossref
  5. Nutritional Status in a Contemporary Urban Population-Based Cohort: Prevalence, Clinical Associations and Long-Term Health Outcomes
    Katja Sibylle Mühlberg, Sabine Steiner, Naomi Elbaranes +4
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPhysiologyEurope PMCCrossref
BibTeX
@article{ye2026clinical,
  title = {{Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Contemporary Salvage Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Failed Primary Therapy: A Single Institution Review}},
  author = {Emily Ye and Randall G. Bissette and Mauricio Vassallo and Maxwell Sandberg and Ashok Hemal and Alejandro R. Rodriguez},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15218424},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8424},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Contemporary Salvage Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Failed Primary Therapy: A Single Institution Review
AU  - Emily Ye
AU  - Randall G. Bissette
AU  - Mauricio Vassallo
AU  - Maxwell Sandberg
AU  - Ashok Hemal
AU  - Alejandro R. Rodriguez
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
JO  - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15218424
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8424
AB  - Background/Objectives: Salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP) is a potentially curative option for recurrent localized prostate cancer after primary radiation or focal therapy, historically limited by technical complexity and poor functional outcomes. This study characterizes contemporary perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes of salvage robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (sRARP) at a single institution over two decades. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing SRP from 01/01/2004 to 06/30/2026, identified via institutional database queries and natural language processing keyword searches with chart confirmation; analysis was restricted to the robotic-assisted subset. Complications within 90 days were graded by the Clavien–Dindo classification. Biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) required freedom from PSA persistence and recurrence (PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL, with biochemical recurrence documented in the medical record) and is reported as a proportion. Results: Of 4002 records identified, 30 patients met inclusion criteria; 24 (80%) underwent sRARP. Extraprostatic disease was present in 54% (13/24) and positive margins in 43% (10/23). Within 90 days, 43% (10/23) had a complication (13% grade ≥ III); 30% (7/23) had a later complication, and 4% (1/24) required later urinary diversion. At a median follow-up of 32.1 months, bRFS was 39% (9/23), and 33% (8/24) had PSA persistence. Incontinence rose from 18% (3/17) at diagnosis to 87% (20/23) post-SRP; at longer-term follow-up (27.3 months), 79% (11/14) used ≥1 pad/day. Erectile dysfunction was present in 82% (14/17) at 22.0 months. Additional cancer-directed therapy was given in 50% (12/24). Conclusions: In this small, descriptive series, sRARP was feasible, but only 39% of patients were free of biochemical recurrence and functional burden was substantial. sRARP may represent a treatment option for carefully selected patients with recurrent localized prostate cancer; however, individualized counseling and further multicenter evaluation are essential.
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -