Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 42 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Reinterpreting Supersymmetry

Abstract

The mathematically elegant and promising idea of supersymmetry faces severe challenges as its conventional weak-scale realizations are increasingly constrained by the lack of experimental evidence of superpartners. However, we point out that the prediction of new (seemingly non-existing) supersymmetric particles is not a necessity: if we slightly relax our expectations from the supersymmetric models, generators Qaα of N-extended supersymmetry can be readily interpreted as carrying a quantum number of the internal gauge group, thus connecting particles with different gauge properties. In this view, operators Qaα remain ``square roots'' of translations, but do not by themselves generate symmetries of the model. They merely represent transformations that mathematically relate bosonic and fermionic fields; it is only the gauge-invariant combinations of the form ∑a {Qaα, Q̅aβ} that correspond to spacetime momenta and thus represent symmetries of the model. With this conceptual modification, the simplest Yang-Mills supersymmetric model no longer connects vector bosons with hypothetical gauginos, but with far less exotic chiral fermions, e.g.\ with left-handed leptons. Further adding an SU(2) doublet of Higgs scalars no longer introduces Higgsinos, but a fermion that naturally corresponds to the right-handed lepton, with the familiar Yukawa term showing up as a mathematical necessity. Despite giving up the requirement that operators Qaα alone generate symmetries of the action, this approach to supersymmetry is strikingly mathematically similar to standard SUSY, raising hopes that many of the favorable properties of standard supersymmetry can be retained, while potentially reconciling the idea of supersymmetry with experimental data. The approach is still quite restrictive: the relative coefficients of such models are strongly determined.

Related

  1. Reinterpreting ATLAS Dijet and Supersymmetry Searches in A Baryon-Number-Violating Heavy Scalar Framework
    Tianyi Yang, Denis Rathjens, Alfredo Gurrola +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  2. Moving Beyond Quasinormal Modes and Reinterpreting Direct Waves in Binary Black Hole Merger-Ringdowns
    Richard Dyer, Anuj Kankani, Gareth Arturo Marks +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  3. Reinterpreting ultrafast experiments on supercooled water: Glass transition versus liquid-liquid criticality
    Florian Pabst, Ali Hassanali
    arXivPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textCondensed matterarXiv
  4. Local supersymmetry implies momentum map/Gauntlett-Pakis equations and vanishing generalized Komar forms
    Patrick Meessen, Tomás Ortín
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  5. Hidden Supersymmetry in AdS/QCD models for Fermions
    Rafael A. Costa-Silva, Henrique Boschi-Filho
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{salom2026reinterpreting,
  title = {{Reinterpreting Supersymmetry}},
  author = {Igor Salom},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.04333},
  eprint = {2609.04333},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04333},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Reinterpreting Supersymmetry
AU  - Igor Salom
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/03
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.04333
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04333
AB  - The mathematically elegant and promising idea of supersymmetry faces severe challenges as its conventional weak-scale realizations are increasingly constrained by the lack of experimental evidence of superpartners. However, we point out that the prediction of new (seemingly non-existing) supersymmetric particles is not a necessity: if we slightly relax our expectations from the supersymmetric models, generators Q^a_α of N-extended supersymmetry can be readily interpreted as carrying a quantum number of the internal gauge group, thus connecting particles with different gauge properties. In this view, operators Q^a_α remain ``square roots'' of translations, but do not by themselves generate symmetries of the model. They merely represent transformations that mathematically relate bosonic and fermionic fields; it is only the gauge-invariant combinations of the form ∑_a {Q^a_α, Q̅_aβ} that correspond to spacetime momenta and thus represent symmetries of the model. With this conceptual modification, the simplest Yang-Mills supersymmetric model no longer connects vector bosons with hypothetical gauginos, but with far less exotic chiral fermions, e.g.\ with left-handed leptons. Further adding an SU(2) doublet of Higgs scalars no longer introduces Higgsinos, but a fermion that naturally corresponds to the right-handed lepton, with the familiar Yukawa term showing up as a mathematical necessity. Despite giving up the requirement that operators Q^a_α alone generate symmetries of the action, this approach to supersymmetry is strikingly mathematically similar to standard SUSY, raising hopes that many of the favorable properties of standard supersymmetry can be retained, while potentially reconciling the idea of supersymmetry with experimental data. The approach is still quite restrictive: the relative coefficients of such models are strongly determined.
ER  -