Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in Sustainable Energy Policy

Post-installation sustainability of small-scale biogas programs: a mini review conceptual model

  1. 1epartment of Physics, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Agriculture, University of Venda, Thohoyandou, South Africa

Abstract

Anaerobic digester technology provides households with gas for cooking and heating while supporting waste management and greenhouse gas mitigation. Many initiatives around the world continue to evaluate success by the number of digesters installed without full knowledge of their operational status or value to beneficiaries. This mini-review focuses on research and reports published between 2005 and 2026 on household-scale anaerobic digesters. Small-scale biogas programs are touted as a renewable energy solution, but their long-term sustainability remains a problem. Much of the literature discusses implementation, but few papers address post-installation challenges. The review found that the technical quality is an important factor leading to the failure (or not) of systems. Continuous access to feedstock for example is essential if the system is to operate; this can be secured through good marketing; but equally a good quality system will in the first place create demand. The ongoing availability of water as both a resource in the biogas process and a consumable is also critical, particularly in dry areas where irrigation is not practicable. This study proposes the Post-Installation Sustainability Model (PISM), an operational synthesis that organizes seven established determinants into four interacting layers, with accountability cutting across them. The PISM treats installation as a transition to continuing service rather than the endpoint of implementation. The central implication is that biogas programs should be financed, monitored and governed as long term energy services rather than one-time technology transfers.

Related

  1. Cost–benefit and econometric analyses of biogas technology for economic sustainability of milk processing SMEs in Northern Tanzania
    Esther L. Mwamafupa, Akinyi L. Sassi, Janet Marwa
    Discover SustainabilityPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionDOAJ
  2. A conceptual framework for life cycle sustainability assessment of mobility systems
    Nicole van den Boom, Adrian Boos, Charly Beye +1
    Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  3. Fe-AC nanocomposites derived from agro-waste biosorbents: a systematic review of synthesis routes, adsorption mechanisms, regeneration, and environmental sustainability.
    Bijoylakshmi Boruah, Pratap Kumar Swain, Manash Ranjan Das
    RSC advancesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textHydrology & soilsEurope PMC
  4. Environmental sustainability studies in US hospitals from 2015-2025: A scoping review of geographic and clinical trends
    Kelli Pajarit Fletcher, Thomas W Gillespie
    EarthArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textClimate scienceEnvironmental science & pollutionEarthArXiv
  5. A systematic review of governance and management arrangements of non-timber forest products for conservation, sustainability, and livelihood outcomes
    Zenebe Girmay Siyum, Jeremy Woods, Laila Kasuri +2
    Ecosystems and PeoplePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{nekhubvi2026postinstallation,
  title = {{Post-installation sustainability of small-scale biogas programs: a mini review conceptual model}},
  author = {Vhutshilo Nekhubvi},
  journal = {Frontiers in Sustainable Energy Policy},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fsuep.2026.1995404},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fsuep.2026.1995404},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Post-installation sustainability of small-scale biogas programs: a mini review conceptual model
AU  - Vhutshilo Nekhubvi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
JO  - Frontiers in Sustainable Energy Policy
DO  - 10.3389/fsuep.2026.1995404
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fsuep.2026.1995404
AB  - Anaerobic digester technology provides households with gas for cooking and heating while supporting waste management and greenhouse gas mitigation. Many initiatives around the world continue to evaluate success by the number of digesters installed without full knowledge of their operational status or value to beneficiaries. This mini-review focuses on research and reports published between 2005 and 2026 on household-scale anaerobic digesters. Small-scale biogas programs are touted as a renewable energy solution, but their long-term sustainability remains a problem. Much of the literature discusses implementation, but few papers address post-installation challenges. The review found that the technical quality is an important factor leading to the failure (or not) of systems. Continuous access to feedstock for example is essential if the system is to operate; this can be secured through good marketing; but equally a good quality system will in the first place create demand. The ongoing availability of water as both a resource in the biogas process and a consumable is also critical, particularly in dry areas where irrigation is not practicable. This study proposes the Post-Installation Sustainability Model (PISM), an operational synthesis that organizes seven established determinants into four interacting layers, with accountability cutting across them. The PISM treats installation as a transition to continuing service rather than the endpoint of implementation. The central implication is that biogas programs should be financed, monitored and governed as long term energy services rather than one-time technology transfers.
SN  - 2813-4982
ER  -