Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 17 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Neuroscience

Orexin-A and Periosteal Pressure Sensitivity during acute mental and physical stress: a randomized cross-over study

  • Nanna Ørsted1
  • Karolina Sikorska2
  • Søren Ballegaard3
  • Katrine Qvortrup1
  1. 1Department of Chemistry, Technical University of Denmark
  2. 2Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark
  3. 3Ballegaard Ltd.
Read full textPDFDOICite

Abstract

Background: Objective physiological markers reflecting central autonomic regulation remain limited. The orexin (hypocretin) system, localized in the lateral hypothalamus, integrates arousal, metabolic state, cardiovascular control, homeostatic control, and stress responsiveness. Periosteal Pressure Sensitivity (PPS) at the sternum has been proposed as a peripheral marker for central sympathetic activation. The present study examined for the first time the association between PPS and salivary orexin-A during experimentally induced mental and physical stress and subsequent recovery.

Methods: In this randomized cross-over study, 20 healthy female participants (20–28 years) completed two experimental procedures in randomized order: Maastricht Acute Stress Test (MAST) and Moderate-Intensity Interval Training (MIIT). PPS, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, Pressure-Rate Product (i.e., systolic blood pressure × heart rate) and salivary orexin-A were measured at baseline, immediately post-procedure, as well as 15 and 30 mins into recovery. MIIT results were analyzed both for the full sample ( n = 20) and for the participants who fulfilled the protocol-defined cardiovascular response criterion ( n = 12).

Results: MAST did not induce significant baseline-to-post-stress changes in PRP, PPS, or salivary orexin-A, although PRP decreased significantly during early recovery from S2 to S3 ( p = 0.045). A significant negative correlation was observed between ΔPPS and ΔPRP from S1 to S2 ( r = −0.47, p = 0.035). MIIT induced a marked increase in PRP followed by a decrease during recovery. Changes in PPS and salivary orexin-A were not significantly correlated in the full MIIT sample. In the separate MIIT sub-analysis, a positive correlation was observed during the 30-min recovery period ( r = 0.76, p = 0.029, and n = 8).

Conclusion: MIIT produced a clear cardiovascular response, whereas MAST did not produce the expected immediate cardiovascular stress response. The MIIT sub-analysis supports a possible association between changes in salivary orexin-A and PPS during recovery but does not establish a causal or central orexin-mediated mechanism. Replication in a larger population using technically successful and standardized MIIT and MAST procedures is required.

Related

  1. Latent profiles of body composition in older adults with hypertension: associations with physical fitness and differences in blood pressure and fasting plasma glucose
    Jae-Hoon Lee, Jaehee Lee, Min-Seong Ha
    Physical activity and nutritionPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Outcomes of Revision Modified Broström Procedure with Periosteal Flap Augmentation in Patients with Recurrent Chronic Ankle Instability
    Jong Jin Moon, Myeong Jun Song, Jun Young Lee
    Clinics in orthopedic surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  3. Interplay of Renal, Vascular, and Immune Signaling in Salt Sensitivity of Blood Pressure: AP-1 as an Emerging Therapeutic Target
    Taseer Ahmad, Ali Raza, Rabeea Ameer +3
    American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textCardiovascular medicinePMC
  4. Effects of liraglutide on blood pressure and renal function in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Shengning Gao, Yudong Shan, Dongxue Ma +2
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Oral Potassium Supplementation Lowers Clinic Blood Pressure in Untreated Primary Hypertension—Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Javier Ravichagua Ashiyama, Felix A. Medina, Cesar Loza +2
    Journal of the American Heart AssociationPeer-reviewedLicence not statedCardiovascular medicineCrossref

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{orsted2026orexina,
  title = {{Orexin-A and Periosteal Pressure Sensitivity during acute mental and physical stress: a randomized cross-over study}},
  author = {Nanna Ørsted and Karolina Sikorska and Søren Ballegaard and Katrine Qvortrup},
  journal = {Frontiers in Neuroscience},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fnins.2026.1923282},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2026.1923282/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Orexin-A and Periosteal Pressure Sensitivity during acute mental and physical stress: a randomized cross-over study
AU  - Nanna Ørsted
AU  - Karolina Sikorska
AU  - Søren Ballegaard
AU  - Katrine Qvortrup
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
JO  - Frontiers in Neuroscience
DO  - 10.3389/fnins.2026.1923282
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2026.1923282/full
AB  - Background: Objective physiological markers reflecting central autonomic regulation remain limited. The orexin (hypocretin) system, localized in the lateral hypothalamus, integrates arousal, metabolic state, cardiovascular control, homeostatic control, and stress responsiveness. Periosteal Pressure Sensitivity (PPS) at the sternum has been proposed as a peripheral marker for central sympathetic activation. The present study examined for the first time the association between PPS and salivary orexin-A during experimentally induced mental and physical stress and subsequent recovery.  Methods: In this randomized cross-over study, 20 healthy female participants (20–28 years) completed two experimental procedures in randomized order: Maastricht Acute Stress Test (MAST) and Moderate-Intensity Interval Training (MIIT). PPS, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, Pressure-Rate Product (i.e., systolic blood pressure × heart rate) and salivary orexin-A were measured at baseline, immediately post-procedure, as well as 15 and 30 mins into recovery. MIIT results were analyzed both for the full sample ( n = 20) and for the participants who fulfilled the protocol-defined cardiovascular response criterion ( n = 12).  Results: MAST did not induce significant baseline-to-post-stress changes in PRP, PPS, or salivary orexin-A, although PRP decreased significantly during early recovery from S2 to S3 ( p = 0.045). A significant negative correlation was observed between ΔPPS and ΔPRP from S1 to S2 ( r = −0.47, p = 0.035). MIIT induced a marked increase in PRP followed by a decrease during recovery. Changes in PPS and salivary orexin-A were not significantly correlated in the full MIIT sample. In the separate MIIT sub-analysis, a positive correlation was observed during the 30-min recovery period ( r = 0.76, p = 0.029, and n = 8).  Conclusion: MIIT produced a clear cardiovascular response, whereas MAST did not produce the expected immediate cardiovascular stress response. The MIIT sub-analysis supports a possible association between changes in salivary orexin-A and PPS during recovery but does not establish a causal or central orexin-mediated mechanism. Replication in a larger population using technically successful and standardized MIIT and MAST procedures is required.
SN  - 1662-453X
SN  - 1662-4548
ER  -