Unified First-Principles Theory of Finite-Wave-Vector Photocurrents in Crystals
Abstract
Spatially structured light carries independent phase and envelope variations in addition to its polarization and frequency. We develop a first-principles theory of second-order dc photocurrents (especially shift and injection) that resolves how these optical degrees of freedom drive distinct dc responses in crystals. The second-order dc response couples two optical field components at the same frequency but with generally different wave vectors. Expanding the response to first order in these wave vectors identifies two rank-four material tensors: ξ, which couples to the optical phase gradient and contains the plane-wave photon-drag limit, and ζ, which couples to the intensity gradient and describes a spatially varying dc current. Wannier-interpolated calculations for monolayer GeS show symmetry-allowed finite-wave-vector responses that survive at a centrosymmetric structure where conventional bulk photovoltaic effect vanishes. For a Gaussian beam with a uniform phase gradient, the phase-gradient contribution drives current in the same direction on both sides of the beam center, whereas the intensity-gradient contribution drives currents in opposite directions, showing that distinct photocurrent patterns can be selected through the wavefront and envelope of light. A multipolar analysis further resolves the optical corrections into electric-quadrupole, orbital magnetic-dipole, and band-dispersion contributions. Together, these results show how the spatial structure of light can serve as an independent control variable for nonlinear photocurrent generation and provide a first-principles route to predict this response in real materials.
Related
- Spin and Charge Photocurrents from Electric-Magnetic Dipole Interference in Centrosymmetric Crystals
- Finite-temperature adiabatic-connection reduced density-matrix functional theory: a unified framework for i-DMFT and TAO-DFT
- Photoemission from Semi-Infinite Crystals: First-Principles Scattering States and Quantitative Ag(111) Validation
- First-Principles Electronic Structure Calculation of Crystals in Laboratory Magnetic Fields
- Out-of-equilibrium modeling of lyotropic liquid crystals: from binary simulations to multi-component theory
BibTeX
@misc{kim2026unified,
title = {{Unified First-Principles Theory of Finite-Wave-Vector Photocurrents in Crystals}},
author = {Bumseop Kim and Sayed Ali Akbar Ghorashi and Yicong Chen and Ritesh Agarwal and Andrew M. Rappe},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.33264},
eprint = {2610.33264},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33264},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Unified First-Principles Theory of Finite-Wave-Vector Photocurrents in Crystals
AU - Bumseop Kim
AU - Sayed Ali Akbar Ghorashi
AU - Yicong Chen
AU - Ritesh Agarwal
AU - Andrew M. Rappe
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/23
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.33264
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33264
AB - Spatially structured light carries independent phase and envelope variations in addition to its polarization and frequency. We develop a first-principles theory of second-order dc photocurrents (especially shift and injection) that resolves how these optical degrees of freedom drive distinct dc responses in crystals. The second-order dc response couples two optical field components at the same frequency but with generally different wave vectors. Expanding the response to first order in these wave vectors identifies two rank-four material tensors: ξ, which couples to the optical phase gradient and contains the plane-wave photon-drag limit, and ζ, which couples to the intensity gradient and describes a spatially varying dc current. Wannier-interpolated calculations for monolayer GeS show symmetry-allowed finite-wave-vector responses that survive at a centrosymmetric structure where conventional bulk photovoltaic effect vanishes. For a Gaussian beam with a uniform phase gradient, the phase-gradient contribution drives current in the same direction on both sides of the beam center, whereas the intensity-gradient contribution drives currents in opposite directions, showing that distinct photocurrent patterns can be selected through the wavefront and envelope of light. A multipolar analysis further resolves the optical corrections into electric-quadrupole, orbital magnetic-dipole, and band-dispersion contributions. Together, these results show how the spatial structure of light can serve as an independent control variable for nonlinear photocurrent generation and provide a first-principles route to predict this response in real materials.
ER -