Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 8 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Factors that impede women’s contraceptive care needs during and immediately after incarceration in New South Wales, Australian. Qualitative perspectives of professional staff working with incarcerated women

  • Helene Smith1
  • Mandy Wilson2
  • Basil Donovan3
  • Jocelyn Jones4
  • Tony Butler
  • Paul Simpson
4 affiliations
  1. 1School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  2. 2Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  3. 3Kurongkurl Katitjin, Centre for Indigenous Australian Education & Research, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  4. 4National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Open at sourceDOICite

Abstract

Introduction: Women with a history of incarceration report higher rates of pregnancy and abortion, lower contraception use and poorer birth outcomes compared to other women in the community. This suggests family-planning and reproductive-health needs that are not well served by current models of care. Despite this, little is known about how contraception is provided within Australian carceral settings, or the structural barriers experienced by professional staff working in these environments. We report findings from a qualitative study conducted in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, describing professional staff’s views of factors that support or impede women’s contraceptive care needs both during and immediately after incarceration. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with n = 12 professionals working in NSW, who either provide healthcare services or individual case management to women during incarceration or in the immediate post-release period. Data was analysed thematically, initially guided by the Vulnerable Populations Behaviour Model and adjusted iteratively as analysis developed. Results: Participants described contraceptive needs and preferences as shaped by 1) a state of interrupted fertility caused by incarceration, and 2) post-release instability and intersecting demands, which impeded access to community family planning. Areas of high need were characterised by 1) accessible, reversible and non-invasive contraception options, and 2) thoughtful counselling. Structural factors impeding contraception service access during incarceration included: 1) service priorities 2) poor overall health service integration, and 3) inequitable funding models. Conclusion: Structural constraints during incarceration, staff attitudes and women’s complex post-release circumstances, limit equitable contraception care, underscoring the need to address barriers at system, clinician and patient levels.

Related

  1. Exploring Medical Professionals’ Perspectives on Cannabinoid Use in Professional and Elite-Level Contact Sports: A Qualitative Inquiry
    Elizabeth S. Thompson, Jane Alcorn, Robert B. Laprairie +3
    Sports healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Stakeholder perspectives on sustainable antenatal point-of-care ultrasound (APOCUS) implementation in rural Australia: a qualitative study of professional body submissions and clinician focus groups.
    Amber Bidner, Sandhya Maranna, Eva Bezak +1
    BMJ openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCCrossref
  3. Examining the Perspectives of Nepalese Senior Public Hospital Mangers on Professional Capability and Capacity Development: A descriptive qualitative study
    Priyanka Pokhrel, Anne Jones, Daniel Lowrie +2
    Asia Pacific Journal of Health ManagementPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textEpidemiology & public healthDOAJ
  4. Competency-based medical education and entrustable professional activities in dental education: Global perspectives and implications for Taiwan.
    Johnson Hsin-Chung Cheng, Sharon Hsuan-Jung Chen
    Journal of dental sciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  5. When to return genomic newborn screening results: health care professional perspectives
    A. C. F. Lewis, A. H. Buchanan, A. J. Goldenberg +4
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textHuman geneticsmedRxiv

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{smith2026factors,
  title = {{Factors that impede women’s contraceptive care needs during and immediately after incarceration in New South Wales, Australian. Qualitative perspectives of professional staff working with incarcerated women}},
  author = {Helene Smith and Mandy Wilson and Basil Donovan and Jocelyn Jones and Tony Butler and Paul Simpson},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0355277},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0355277},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Factors that impede women’s contraceptive care needs during and immediately after incarceration in New South Wales, Australian. Qualitative perspectives of professional staff working with incarcerated women
AU  - Helene Smith
AU  - Mandy Wilson
AU  - Basil Donovan
AU  - Jocelyn Jones
AU  - Tony Butler
AU  - Paul Simpson
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/31
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0355277
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0355277
AB  - Introduction: Women with a history of incarceration report higher rates of pregnancy and abortion, lower contraception use and poorer birth outcomes compared to other women in the community. This suggests family-planning and reproductive-health needs that are not well served by current models of care. Despite this, little is known about how contraception is provided within Australian carceral settings, or the structural barriers experienced by professional staff working in these environments. We report findings from a qualitative study conducted in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, describing professional staff’s views of factors that support or impede women’s contraceptive care needs both during and immediately after incarceration. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with n = 12 professionals working in NSW, who either provide healthcare services or individual case management to women during incarceration or in the immediate post-release period. Data was analysed thematically, initially guided by the Vulnerable Populations Behaviour Model and adjusted iteratively as analysis developed. Results: Participants described contraceptive needs and preferences as shaped by 1) a state of interrupted fertility caused by incarceration, and 2) post-release instability and intersecting demands, which impeded access to community family planning. Areas of high need were characterised by 1) accessible, reversible and non-invasive contraception options, and 2) thoughtful counselling. Structural factors impeding contraception service access during incarceration included: 1) service priorities 2) poor overall health service integration, and 3) inequitable funding models. Conclusion: Structural constraints during incarceration, staff attitudes and women’s complex post-release circumstances, limit equitable contraception care, underscoring the need to address barriers at system, clinician and patient levels.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -