Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,761 studies31 sourcesUpdated 31 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

Routine metabolic–adiposity indices and incident cardiometabolic multimorbidity among adults with CKM stages 0–3: a prospective cohort study

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Brain Injury Laboratory, The Affiliated Taian City Central Hospital of Qingdao University, Taian, Shandong Province China
  2. 2Department of Neuroimmunology and Infectious Diseases, The Affiliated Taian City Central Hospital of Qingdao University, Taian, China
  3. 3Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Taian City Central Hospital of Qingdao University, Taian, China
  4. 4Cerebrovascular Disease Screening and Follow-up Office, The Affiliated Taian City Central Hospital of Qingdao University, Taian, China

Abstract

Background: Cardiometabolic multimorbidity (CMM) is an increasing burden in ageing populations. Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) stages 0–3 provide an upstream framework for identifying metabolic, renal, and cardiovascular vulnerability before overt multimorbidity. We evaluated whether routinely derived metabolic–adiposity indices add useful risk-phenotype information beyond established clinical factors.

Methods: This prospective CHARLS cohort included 7,062 adults aged ≥ 45 years who were free of CMM and had CKM stages 0–3 at baseline. Twenty-nine cholesterol–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol–glucose (CHG)-derived, triglyceride–glucose (TyG)-derived, and adiposity/body-shape indices were evaluated; the main text focused on RFM, CHG-RFM, TyG-RFM, BMI, and WC. Model 3 was used to anchor the primary association interpretation, while Model 4 was retained as an extended clinical-adjustment model to assess robustness after broader adjustment. Benjamini–Hochberg correction, inter-index correlations, paired CHG–TyG models, proportional-hazards diagnostics, prediction analyses, and sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results: Among 7,062 participants, 613 developed incident CMM (8.7%). In Model 3, the per-SD HRs (95% CIs) were 1.85 (1.52–2.25) for RFM, 1.72 (1.47–2.03) for CHG-RFM, 1.67 (1.41–1.98) for TyG-RFM, 1.30 (1.20–1.41) for BMI, and 1.34 (1.23–1.46) for WC. The corresponding estimates remained broadly consistent in Model 4. After Benjamini–Hochberg correction, 28 of 29 Model 3 per-SD associations remained supported; ABSI was the exception. Correlations were substantial among structurally related indices, and paired CHG–TyG models showed marked mutual attenuation. The clinical baseline AUC was 0.787, whereas selected index-extended models achieved AUCs of approximately 0.799–0.800, indicating modest absolute improvement.

Conclusions: Selected routine metabolic–adiposity indices were associated with incident CMM among adults with CKM stages 0–3. RFM-related indices showed stronger association signals, whereas BMI and WC remain more accessible measures. The broadly consistent Model 3 and Model 4 estimates supported the overall association pattern. However, because inter-index overlap was substantial and incremental predictive gains were modest, these indices should be viewed as candidate adjunctive risk markers rather than independent biomarkers or clinically validated decision tools.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-026-06385-5.

Related

  1. Ultra-processed food indices and component food groups in relation to incident type 2 diabetes and cardiometabolic multimorbidity: a prospective cohort study
    Linjiang Wei, Ying Han, Yuelong Ji +1
    BMC MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  2. Joint association of five insulin resistance indices and frailty index with incident cardiometabolic multimorbidity in individuals with cardiovascular–kidney–metabolic syndrome stages 0–3: a prospective cohort study
    Jiawang Zou, Hailan Xiong, Shuchang Ding +6
    Cardiovascular DiabetologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEndocrinology & metabolismPMC
  3. Living environmental quality and incident cardiometabolic multimorbidity: a prospective cohort study in China
    Hao Chen, Shengnan Yue, Shengyan Hou +3
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  4. Associations of cumulative exposure and dynamic trajectories of the combined atherogenic-frailty index with incident cardiometabolic multimorbidity: a prospective cohort study.
    Haidi Wu, Zikai Song, Tengfei Ye +1
    Journal of global healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  5. Association of TyG-related indices with cardiometabolic multimorbidity across early cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome stages 0–3: a prospective cohort study
    Ankai Chen, Haosen Pan, Guijun Liu +6
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEndocrinology & metabolismCrossref
BibTeX
@article{geng2026routine,
  title = {{Routine metabolic–adiposity indices and incident cardiometabolic multimorbidity among adults with CKM stages 0–3: a prospective cohort study}},
  author = {Zhenyu Geng and Yawei Rong and Jiahao Liu and Haochen Yang and Yulun Wang and Xunlu Yin and Xiangning He and Qian Chen and Fangfang Zhao and Guojun Wang},
  journal = {BMC Cardiovascular Disorders},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1186/s12872-026-06385-5},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-026-06385-5},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Routine metabolic–adiposity indices and incident cardiometabolic multimorbidity among adults with CKM stages 0–3: a prospective cohort study
AU  - Zhenyu Geng
AU  - Yawei Rong
AU  - Jiahao Liu
AU  - Haochen Yang
AU  - Yulun Wang
AU  - Xunlu Yin
AU  - Xiangning He
AU  - Qian Chen
AU  - Fangfang Zhao
AU  - Guojun Wang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/08
JO  - BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
DO  - 10.1186/s12872-026-06385-5
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-026-06385-5
AB  - Background: Cardiometabolic multimorbidity (CMM) is an increasing burden in ageing populations. Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) stages 0–3 provide an upstream framework for identifying metabolic, renal, and cardiovascular vulnerability before overt multimorbidity. We evaluated whether routinely derived metabolic–adiposity indices add useful risk-phenotype information beyond established clinical factors.  Methods: This prospective CHARLS cohort included 7,062 adults aged ≥ 45 years who were free of CMM and had CKM stages 0–3 at baseline. Twenty-nine cholesterol–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol–glucose (CHG)-derived, triglyceride–glucose (TyG)-derived, and adiposity/body-shape indices were evaluated; the main text focused on RFM, CHG-RFM, TyG-RFM, BMI, and WC. Model 3 was used to anchor the primary association interpretation, while Model 4 was retained as an extended clinical-adjustment model to assess robustness after broader adjustment. Benjamini–Hochberg correction, inter-index correlations, paired CHG–TyG models, proportional-hazards diagnostics, prediction analyses, and sensitivity analyses were performed.  Results: Among 7,062 participants, 613 developed incident CMM (8.7%). In Model 3, the per-SD HRs (95% CIs) were 1.85 (1.52–2.25) for RFM, 1.72 (1.47–2.03) for CHG-RFM, 1.67 (1.41–1.98) for TyG-RFM, 1.30 (1.20–1.41) for BMI, and 1.34 (1.23–1.46) for WC. The corresponding estimates remained broadly consistent in Model 4. After Benjamini–Hochberg correction, 28 of 29 Model 3 per-SD associations remained supported; ABSI was the exception. Correlations were substantial among structurally related indices, and paired CHG–TyG models showed marked mutual attenuation. The clinical baseline AUC was 0.787, whereas selected index-extended models achieved AUCs of approximately 0.799–0.800, indicating modest absolute improvement.  Conclusions: Selected routine metabolic–adiposity indices were associated with incident CMM among adults with CKM stages 0–3. RFM-related indices showed stronger association signals, whereas BMI and WC remain more accessible measures. The broadly consistent Model 3 and Model 4 estimates supported the overall association pattern. However, because inter-index overlap was substantial and incremental predictive gains were modest, these indices should be viewed as candidate adjunctive risk markers rather than independent biomarkers or clinically validated decision tools.  Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-026-06385-5.
SN  - 1471-2261
ER  -