Expert-based classification on the technical difficulty of single-port urological robotic procedures
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, Lausanne, 1011 Switzerland
- 2Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
- 3Department of Urology, Cromwell Hospital, London, UK
- 4Department of Urology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
Abstract
Single-port (SP) robotic surgery represents the latest paradigm shift in minimally invasive urology. Despite its progressive adoption worldwide, no structured classification of procedural difficulty exists for SP urological procedures. We aimed to develop an expert-based scoring system to grade the technical difficulty of urological procedures performed with the da Vinci SP platform. A questionnaire-based expert-consensus study was conducted during an international meeting on SP robotic surgery (Turin, Italy, February 2026). Consensus here refers to the descriptive convergence of independent, single-round ratings rather than a formal iterative (e.g., Delphi) consensus process. Eligible experts had independent or assisted SP robotic experience. Using a structured questionnaire, they rated each procedure on three dimensions — technical difficulty, operative risk and sustained attention required — on a 7-point Likert scale. A composite difficulty score was obtained by summing the three median values. Experts also estimated the number of cases required to reach proficiency and rated the role of prior multi-port robotic experience. Nine procedures were classified. Composite scores ranged from 8 (pyeloplasty, “slightly difficult”) to 16 (radical cystectomy with intracorporeal diversion, “very difficult”). Estimated proficiency thresholds ranged from 10 to 33 cases. All experts considered prior multi-port robotic experience necessary before SP adoption. Early challenges were dominated by prolonged operative time, limited exposure and reduced ergonomics rather than instrument collision or spatial disorientation. We propose the first structured expert-based difficulty classification for SP robotic urological surgery. The procedural hierarchy mirrors historical laparoscopic and multi-port robotic classifications, supporting the concept that intrinsic complexity transcends the platform. This framework may inform training curricula, case selection during adoption and safe dissemination of SP robotic surgery.
Related
- Virtual Reality for Pain, Anxiety, and Patient Experience in Awake Urological Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
- Technical efficiency in hip arthroscopy plateaus after approximately 240 cases while complication rates continue to decline: A 15‐year single‐surgeon series of 1490 consecutive procedures
- Comparison of the Technical Success of Obtura and StarClose Systems for Femoral Arterial Access-Site Closure in Neurointerventional Procedures: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study
- Stoma-Site Single-Port Robotic Restorative Colorectal Surgery Using the da Vinci SP System: Technical Considerations and Early Outcomes.
- From Thoracotomy to Robotic Platforms in Thoracic Surgery: Technical Evolution, Simulation-Based Training, and Surgical Outcomes.
BibTeX
@article{bruyere2026expertbased,
title = {{Expert-based classification on the technical difficulty of single-port urological robotic procedures}},
author = {Franck Bruyère and Nuno Grilo and Francesco Soria and Marco Oderda and Christopher Anderson and Simone Crivellaro and Ilaria Lucca and Paolo Gontero},
journal = {Journal of Robotic Surgery},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1007/s11701-026-04124-8},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-026-04124-8},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Expert-based classification on the technical difficulty of single-port urological robotic procedures
AU - Franck Bruyère
AU - Nuno Grilo
AU - Francesco Soria
AU - Marco Oderda
AU - Christopher Anderson
AU - Simone Crivellaro
AU - Ilaria Lucca
AU - Paolo Gontero
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/31
JO - Journal of Robotic Surgery
DO - 10.1007/s11701-026-04124-8
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-026-04124-8
AB - Single-port (SP) robotic surgery represents the latest paradigm shift in minimally invasive urology. Despite its progressive adoption worldwide, no structured classification of procedural difficulty exists for SP urological procedures. We aimed to develop an expert-based scoring system to grade the technical difficulty of urological procedures performed with the da Vinci SP platform. A questionnaire-based expert-consensus study was conducted during an international meeting on SP robotic surgery (Turin, Italy, February 2026). Consensus here refers to the descriptive convergence of independent, single-round ratings rather than a formal iterative (e.g., Delphi) consensus process. Eligible experts had independent or assisted SP robotic experience. Using a structured questionnaire, they rated each procedure on three dimensions — technical difficulty, operative risk and sustained attention required — on a 7-point Likert scale. A composite difficulty score was obtained by summing the three median values. Experts also estimated the number of cases required to reach proficiency and rated the role of prior multi-port robotic experience. Nine procedures were classified. Composite scores ranged from 8 (pyeloplasty, “slightly difficult”) to 16 (radical cystectomy with intracorporeal diversion, “very difficult”). Estimated proficiency thresholds ranged from 10 to 33 cases. All experts considered prior multi-port robotic experience necessary before SP adoption. Early challenges were dominated by prolonged operative time, limited exposure and reduced ergonomics rather than instrument collision or spatial disorientation. We propose the first structured expert-based difficulty classification for SP robotic urological surgery. The procedural hierarchy mirrors historical laparoscopic and multi-port robotic classifications, supporting the concept that intrinsic complexity transcends the platform. This framework may inform training curricula, case selection during adoption and safe dissemination of SP robotic surgery.
SN - 1863-2483
SN - 1863-2491
ER -