Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0JMIR Formative Research

Feasibility of Online and On-Site Physical Activity Delivery Among Older Adults: Mixed Methods Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Anna Nilstomt1,2,3
  • Johanna Gustavsson3,4
  • Charlotte Bäccman1,2
  • Linda Beckman5
  • Finn Nilson3,4
  • Erik Wästlund1,2
5 affiliations
  1. 1Service Research Centre (CTF) Karlstad University Karlstad Sweden
  2. 2Department of Social and Psychological Studies Karlstad University Karlstad Sweden
  3. 3Centre for Societal Risk Research (CSR) Karlstad University Karlstad Sweden
  4. 4Department of Political, Historical, Religious and Cultural Studies Karlstad University Karlstad Sweden
  5. 5Department of Public Health Karlstad University Karlstad Sweden
Read full textDOICite

Abstract

Background: Physical activity (PA) is central to healthy aging, yet interventions targeting older adults often report substantial attrition and variable adherence. Although digital and internet-based exercise programs broaden accessibility and flexibility, their ability to sustain engagement compared with traditional on-site formats remains unclear. Understanding how delivery mode influences attrition and adherence—and why participants persist or withdraw—is essential for designing inclusive and sustainable PA interventions.

Objective: This pilot study evaluates the feasibility of delivering a 26-week PA intervention to older adults through 2 modes: online or on-site. Feasibility was assessed primarily by attrition, adherence, and participants’ experiences of factors influencing continued participation or withdrawal. Additionally, the study explores preliminary patterns in PA levels and physical and mental health outcomes to inform the design of a future definitive trial.

Methods: This 26-week pragmatic pilot trial used an embedded convergent mixed methods design. Community-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older (N=35) from 3 residential areas in Sweden were cluster-randomized, without blinding, by site to an online (prerecorded video-based Otago exercises; n=12) or on-site (group-based, in-person Otago exercises; n=23) delivery mode. Feasibility outcomes included attrition and adherence. Exploratory outcomes included PA level (Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire), lower-body strength (Chair Stand Test), depressive symptoms (Geriatric Depression Scale), and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3L), assessed at baseline, midintervention (14 weeks), and postintervention (26 weeks). Exploratory quantitative analyses included t tests, chi-square tests, analysis of covariance, and mixed-design ANOVAs. We analyzed semistructured interviews with completers (n=17) and dropouts (n=7) using qualitative content analysis. Findings were integrated using the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior) framework.

Results: The overall attrition rate was 37% (13/35), with no significant difference between delivery modes (P=.29). Most dropouts occurred within the first 2 weeks. Mean adherence appeared higher in the online delivery mode (mean 17.0, SD 6.7) than in the on-site delivery mode (mean 12.1, SD 10.1) but did not differ significantly (P=.15). Qualitative findings indicated that attrition was primarily driven by physical health issues and a perceived lack of fit, whereas adherence was supported by appeal and reward, routine and commitment, flexibility, feedback and PA overview, and (often) social presence. Mixed methods findings suggest that capability, opportunity, and motivation supported participation across both delivery modes. No intervention-related adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: Both online and on-site delivery modes for PA interventions appeared feasible for many older adults. Although no statistically significant between-group differences were observed, the study was not powered to evaluate effectiveness. Feasibility may depend more on supporting capability, opportunity, and motivation than on delivery mode. Larger, adequately powered trials are needed to test effectiveness, identify optimal formats for different populations, and evaluate strategies to reduce early attrition.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05885308; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05885308

Related

  1. m-Health intervention for physical activity among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in India: a randomized controlled trial
    Pappu Prasad Shah, Nidhi Bhatnagar, Bratati Banerjee +4
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  2. Effects of physical activity on executive function components and academic performance in children aged 6–12 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Pingxue Qiu, Ting Zhou, Jiachen Wu +3
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0PhysiologyCrossref
  3. Reducing sedentary behavior and promoting physical activity in medical students: protocol of the PROMESS-Physical Activity randomized controlled clinical trial
    Sophie Schlatter, Mathilde Mura, Mathilde Fiona Bertrand +9
    TrialsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHALCrossref
  4. Effects of health promotion behavior education in pregnancy on sleep quality and physical activity: a randomized controlled trial
    Fatma Kurt, Safiye Ozvurmaz
    BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPhysiologyDOAJ
  5. Effects of cervical stability exercises using proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation on physical function and activity in patients with neck pain and forward head posture : A randomized controlled trial
    Beom Ryong Kim
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{nilstomt2026feasibility,
  title = {{Feasibility of Online and On-Site Physical Activity Delivery Among Older Adults: Mixed Methods Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial}},
  author = {Anna Nilstomt and Johanna Gustavsson and Charlotte Bäccman and Linda Beckman and Finn Nilson and Erik Wästlund},
  journal = {JMIR Formative Research},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.2196/97824},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.2196/97824},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Feasibility of Online and On-Site Physical Activity Delivery Among Older Adults: Mixed Methods Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
AU  - Anna Nilstomt
AU  - Johanna Gustavsson
AU  - Charlotte Bäccman
AU  - Linda Beckman
AU  - Finn Nilson
AU  - Erik Wästlund
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/13
JO  - JMIR Formative Research
DO  - 10.2196/97824
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2196/97824
AB  - Background: Physical activity (PA) is central to healthy aging, yet interventions targeting older adults often report substantial attrition and variable adherence. Although digital and internet-based exercise programs broaden accessibility and flexibility, their ability to sustain engagement compared with traditional on-site formats remains unclear. Understanding how delivery mode influences attrition and adherence—and why participants persist or withdraw—is essential for designing inclusive and sustainable PA interventions.  Objective: This pilot study evaluates the feasibility of delivering a 26-week PA intervention to older adults through 2 modes: online or on-site. Feasibility was assessed primarily by attrition, adherence, and participants’ experiences of factors influencing continued participation or withdrawal. Additionally, the study explores preliminary patterns in PA levels and physical and mental health outcomes to inform the design of a future definitive trial.  Methods: This 26-week pragmatic pilot trial used an embedded convergent mixed methods design. Community-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older (N=35) from 3 residential areas in Sweden were cluster-randomized, without blinding, by site to an online (prerecorded video-based Otago exercises; n=12) or on-site (group-based, in-person Otago exercises; n=23) delivery mode. Feasibility outcomes included attrition and adherence. Exploratory outcomes included PA level (Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire), lower-body strength (Chair Stand Test), depressive symptoms (Geriatric Depression Scale), and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3L), assessed at baseline, midintervention (14 weeks), and postintervention (26 weeks). Exploratory quantitative analyses included t tests, chi-square tests, analysis of covariance, and mixed-design ANOVAs. We analyzed semistructured interviews with completers (n=17) and dropouts (n=7) using qualitative content analysis. Findings were integrated using the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior) framework.  Results: The overall attrition rate was 37% (13/35), with no significant difference between delivery modes (P=.29). Most dropouts occurred within the first 2 weeks. Mean adherence appeared higher in the online delivery mode (mean 17.0, SD 6.7) than in the on-site delivery mode (mean 12.1, SD 10.1) but did not differ significantly (P=.15). Qualitative findings indicated that attrition was primarily driven by physical health issues and a perceived lack of fit, whereas adherence was supported by appeal and reward, routine and commitment, flexibility, feedback and PA overview, and (often) social presence. Mixed methods findings suggest that capability, opportunity, and motivation supported participation across both delivery modes. No intervention-related adverse events were reported.  Conclusions: Both online and on-site delivery modes for PA interventions appeared feasible for many older adults. Although no statistically significant between-group differences were observed, the study was not powered to evaluate effectiveness. Feasibility may depend more on supporting capability, opportunity, and motivation than on delivery mode. Larger, adequately powered trials are needed to test effectiveness, identify optimal formats for different populations, and evaluate strategies to reduce early attrition.  Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05885308; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05885308
SN  - 2561-326X
ER  -