Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated just now
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Cognitive Processing

Higher- and lower-level processing in strategic reading: Reconceptualising the Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS)

  • Marcus Warnby1
  1. 1Department of Education and Special Education, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
Read full textPDFDOICite

Abstract

The Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS) is widely used to assess English-as-a-second-language (ESL) students’ metacognitive regulation of reading across three strategy dimensions (Global, Problem-Solving, Support), yet this three-factor structure has rarely undergone confirmatory validation. This study introduces HiLoLev, a theory-driven two-factor measurement reconceptualisation that distinguishes higher-level integrative/monitoring strategies from lower-level decoding/support strategies. Using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on data from 554 Swedish upper-secondary ESL students, legacy three-factor specifications (oblique, higher-order) were contrasted with the proposed theory-driven HiLoLev model based on SORS items. The original structures showed poor fit with high interfactor correlations and substantial cross-loadings; by contrast, an 11-item HiLoLev model fit well (RMSEA = 0.051, SRMR = 0.045) and offered clearer interpretability. While the full SORS remains pedagogically useful, its subscales should not be assumed to represent stable latent constructs for inferential analyses. For research applications (e.g., regression models, mediation analyses, or group comparisons), confirm the structure in-sample via CFA or consider using the 11-item HiLoLev model as a compact, cognitively grounded latent specification of SORS items.

Related

  1. Preserved higher-order mentalising during strategic interactions after medial prefrontal cortex damage
    Yi-Chen Hsieh, Arkady Konovalov, Zhi-Lin Su +6
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceCrossref
  2. Processing at Phrase Boundaries During Self-Paced Reading
    J. Hooper, J. Dengler, N. Biondo +5
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  3. Executive and language systems competitively shape predictive processing during reading
    S. Martin, A.-L. Schuler, O. Numssen +4
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  4. Spatiotemporal Accumulation of Four Major Bioactive Compounds in Zanthoxylum nitidum Roots: Implications for Tissue-Specific Processing and Harvesting Strategies
    Tao Tian, Sha Gao, Yi Wu +4
    Plants (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyEurope PMC
  5. Higher-order adaptive behaviors outperform pairwise strategies in mitigating contagion dynamics
    Marco Mancastroppa, Márton Karsai, Alain Barrat
    Physical Review EPeer-reviewedHAL deposit licenceFull text3 citedGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{warnby2026higher,
  title = {{Higher- and lower-level processing in strategic reading: Reconceptualising the Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS)}},
  author = {Marcus Warnby},
  journal = {Cognitive Processing},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1007/s10339-026-01372-2},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-026-01372-2},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Higher- and lower-level processing in strategic reading: Reconceptualising the Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS)
AU  - Marcus Warnby
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - Cognitive Processing
DO  - 10.1007/s10339-026-01372-2
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-026-01372-2
AB  - The Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS) is widely used to assess English-as-a-second-language (ESL) students’ metacognitive regulation of reading across three strategy dimensions (Global, Problem-Solving, Support), yet this three-factor structure has rarely undergone confirmatory validation. This study introduces HiLoLev, a theory-driven two-factor measurement reconceptualisation that distinguishes higher-level integrative/monitoring strategies from lower-level decoding/support strategies. Using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on data from 554 Swedish upper-secondary ESL students, legacy three-factor specifications (oblique, higher-order) were contrasted with the proposed theory-driven HiLoLev model based on SORS items. The original structures showed poor fit with high interfactor correlations and substantial cross-loadings; by contrast, an 11-item HiLoLev model fit well (RMSEA = 0.051, SRMR = 0.045) and offered clearer interpretability. While the full SORS remains pedagogically useful, its subscales should not be assumed to represent stable latent constructs for inferential analyses. For research applications (e.g., regression models, mediation analyses, or group comparisons), confirm the structure in-sample via CFA or consider using the 11-item HiLoLev model as a compact, cognitively grounded latent specification of SORS items.
SN  - 1612-4782
SN  - 1612-4790
ER  -