Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
206,690 studies31 sourcesUpdated 36 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Laplace approximation of the parameter posterior with embedded error for efficient uncertainty quantification of expensive model calibrations

Abstract

In practical engineering, there is a clear need for uncertainty quantification (UQ) of models used in design because forward UQ puts probabilities on performance predictions. However, without surrogate building, most forward engineering models are too expensive for traditional UQ methods like Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling. Our goal is to provide inexpensive, approxi- mate UQ that can be applied after an expensive traditional least squares fit, where the UQ handles both uncorrelated noise and parameter variance as in the embedded-error treatment developed by Sargsyan, Najm, and Ghanem (2015). After developing the basic theory to connect a Laplace-like approximation to Bayesian calibration, we compare the proposed method to black-box variational inference in terms of cost and fidelity. Then we demonstrate the method on real-world calibration of solid material models.

Related

  1. Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Optimal Excitation Design in Parameter Identification
    Kevin Schmidt, Nicola Henkelmann, Christoph Mark +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. Uncertainty Quantification for Landweber Iteration with Randomized Normal-Operator Approximation
    Anuj Abhishek, Sean Holman
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingStatisticsarXiv
  3. Global Parameter Identification and Uncertainty Quantification of reduced-order ADM1 using Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Bayesian Inference
    Simon Hellmann, Leander Lerch, Terrance Wilms +6
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Decision-Sufficient Posterior Approximation
    Sean Plummer
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Bayesian Geometric Inversion for Wave Equation: Well-Posedness and Multiscale Multimodal Posterior Approximation
    Xiong-Bin Yan, Ming-Jia Pei, Guang-Hui Zheng +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{jones2026laplace,
  title = {{Laplace approximation of the parameter posterior with embedded error for efficient uncertainty quantification of expensive model calibrations}},
  author = {Reese E. Jones and Kyle N. Karlson and Matt W. Kury and Moe Khalil and Ray S. Tuminaro},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.10210},
  eprint = {2611.10210},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10210},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Laplace approximation of the parameter posterior with embedded error for efficient uncertainty quantification of expensive model calibrations
AU  - Reese E. Jones
AU  - Kyle N. Karlson
AU  - Matt W. Kury
AU  - Moe Khalil
AU  - Ray S. Tuminaro
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/06
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.10210
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10210
AB  - In practical engineering, there is a clear need for uncertainty quantification (UQ) of models used in design because forward UQ puts probabilities on performance predictions. However, without surrogate building, most forward engineering models are too expensive for traditional UQ methods like Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling. Our goal is to provide inexpensive, approxi- mate UQ that can be applied after an expensive traditional least squares fit, where the UQ handles both uncorrelated noise and parameter variance as in the embedded-error treatment developed by Sargsyan, Najm, and Ghanem (2015). After developing the basic theory to connect a Laplace-like approximation to Bayesian calibration, we compare the proposed method to black-box variational inference in terms of cost and fidelity. Then we demonstrate the method on real-world calibration of solid material models.
ER  -