Effect of aerobic and Pilates exercise on balance, gait, functional capacity, lower extremity strength, fear of falling, sleep quality, and quality of life in older adults.
6 affiliations
- 1Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, 154 Rama 1 Road, Wangmai, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
- 2Department of Physical Therapy, California State University Northridge, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- 3Faculty of Rehabilitation, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
- 4Bannu Medical College, Khyber Medical University, Bannu, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
- 5Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
- 6Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, 154 Rama 1 Road, Wangmai, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. [email protected].
Abstract
Objective
The primary objective was to compare the effects of aerobic and Pilates exercise programs on balance, gait performance, functional capacity, lower extremity strength, fear of falling, sleep quality, and quality of life in older adults. A secondary objective was to determine which exercise modality yields greater improvements in these outcomes, thereby providing evidence to guide the selection of effective exercise interventions for promoting health and well-being among the older adults.Methods
Forty-four older adults, aged 60-69 years, were randomly assigned into either the aerobic (n = 22) or Pilates exercise group (n = 22). The aerobic group trained three sessions per week (30 min of active exercise per session; 90 min/week), while the Pilates group (PG) trained two sessions per week (45 min of active exercise per session comprising mat, standing, and TheraBand components; 90 min/week), each for eight weeks, yielding equivalent total active exercise volumes (720 min per group). The outcomes of Mini-Balance Evaluation System Test (MBEST), Timed Up and Go test (TUGT), 2-Minute Walk Test (2MWT), 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), Five-Time Sit-to-Stand test (5xSTST) and self-reported questionnaires of the Fall Efficacy Scale International (FES-I), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and WHOQOL-Brief were collected at baseline and post-treatment.Results
Groups were equivalent at baseline across all measures. Significant Group × Time interaction effects were observed for gait velocity (10MWT) and dynamic balance (MBEST), with the aerobic group demonstrating significantly greater improvements in both (10MWT: p = 0.016; MBEST: p < 0.001). ANCOVA adjusting for baseline score, age, and BMI confirmed these between-group differences (10MWT: p = 0.012; MBEST: p < 0.001). Significant time main effects (p < 0.05) were observed for all remaining outcome measures (TUGT, 5×STST, 2MWT, FES-I, PSQI, all WHOQOL-Brief domains), indicating meaningful within-group improvements shared across both interventions.Conclusion
Both aerobic and Pilates exercise programs produced clinically meaningful improvements in gait velocity, functional capacity, and balance in older adults, with the aerobic group demonstrating significantly greater improvements in dynamic balance. Both interventions additionally reduced fall-risk classifications based on clinical threshold analyses. The findings of this study suggest that aerobic exercise may be the preferred modality for optimizing functional mobility and balance in community-dwelling older adults, though both modalities offer valuable and clinically meaningful health benefits. Future trials equalizing both volume and frequency are warranted to confirm modality-specific effects with full design equivalence.Trial registration
This Clinical Trial is registered with Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR) approved by WHO. Registration number TCTR20240403002. Date of registration 13 March 2024. URL https//www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/#.
Related
- Inspiratory muscle strength and skeletal muscle mass are associated with postoperative functional exercise capacity after lung cancer surgery : A retrospective cohort study
- Efficacy of a weighted-vest aerobic dance intervention for enhancing lower extremity strength and mobility in older adults: a randomized controlled trial
- Beyond the clinic: a six-month home-based exercise and respiratory rehabilitation program improves functional capacity, respiratory muscle strength, and fatigue in chronic heart failure.
- Exercise intolerance and impaired aerobic capacity in heart transplant recipients.
- Effect of a Four-Week Thrower's Ten Exercise Program on Upper Extremity Dynamic Balance and Strength in Racket Sports Players.
BibTeX
@article{abdullah2026effect,
title = {{Effect of aerobic and Pilates exercise on balance, gait, functional capacity, lower extremity strength, fear of falling, sleep quality, and quality of life in older adults.}},
author = {Abdullah and Witaya Mathiyakom and Tsuyoshi Asai and Nasrullah Khan and Irfan Ullah and Anong Tantisuwat},
journal = {BMC geriatrics},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s12877-026-08037-x},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42902197},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Effect of aerobic and Pilates exercise on balance, gait, functional capacity, lower extremity strength, fear of falling, sleep quality, and quality of life in older adults.
AU - Abdullah
AU - Witaya Mathiyakom
AU - Tsuyoshi Asai
AU - Nasrullah Khan
AU - Irfan Ullah
AU - Anong Tantisuwat
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - BMC geriatrics
DO - 10.1186/s12877-026-08037-x
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42902197
AB - Objective The primary objective was to compare the effects of aerobic and Pilates exercise programs on balance, gait performance, functional capacity, lower extremity strength, fear of falling, sleep quality, and quality of life in older adults. A secondary objective was to determine which exercise modality yields greater improvements in these outcomes, thereby providing evidence to guide the selection of effective exercise interventions for promoting health and well-being among the older adults.Methods Forty-four older adults, aged 60-69 years, were randomly assigned into either the aerobic (n = 22) or Pilates exercise group (n = 22). The aerobic group trained three sessions per week (30 min of active exercise per session; 90 min/week), while the Pilates group (PG) trained two sessions per week (45 min of active exercise per session comprising mat, standing, and TheraBand components; 90 min/week), each for eight weeks, yielding equivalent total active exercise volumes (720 min per group). The outcomes of Mini-Balance Evaluation System Test (MBEST), Timed Up and Go test (TUGT), 2-Minute Walk Test (2MWT), 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), Five-Time Sit-to-Stand test (5xSTST) and self-reported questionnaires of the Fall Efficacy Scale International (FES-I), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and WHOQOL-Brief were collected at baseline and post-treatment.Results Groups were equivalent at baseline across all measures. Significant Group × Time interaction effects were observed for gait velocity (10MWT) and dynamic balance (MBEST), with the aerobic group demonstrating significantly greater improvements in both (10MWT: p = 0.016; MBEST: p < 0.001). ANCOVA adjusting for baseline score, age, and BMI confirmed these between-group differences (10MWT: p = 0.012; MBEST: p < 0.001). Significant time main effects (p < 0.05) were observed for all remaining outcome measures (TUGT, 5×STST, 2MWT, FES-I, PSQI, all WHOQOL-Brief domains), indicating meaningful within-group improvements shared across both interventions.Conclusion Both aerobic and Pilates exercise programs produced clinically meaningful improvements in gait velocity, functional capacity, and balance in older adults, with the aerobic group demonstrating significantly greater improvements in dynamic balance. Both interventions additionally reduced fall-risk classifications based on clinical threshold analyses. The findings of this study suggest that aerobic exercise may be the preferred modality for optimizing functional mobility and balance in community-dwelling older adults, though both modalities offer valuable and clinically meaningful health benefits. Future trials equalizing both volume and frequency are warranted to confirm modality-specific effects with full design equivalence.Trial registration This Clinical Trial is registered with Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR) approved by WHO. Registration number TCTR20240403002. Date of registration 13 March 2024. URL https//www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/#.
SN - 1471-2318
ER -