Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 8 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDmedRxiv

Association Between Continuous Glucose Monitoring - Derived Time in Range and Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of current evidence

  1. 1Maulana Azad Medical College

Abstract

BackgroundContinuous glucose monitoring-derived time in range (TIR; glucose 70-180 mg/dL) has emerged as a complementary glycemic metric, but its association with DKD (Diabetic Kidney Disease) has not been systematically quantified. We aimed to synthesize the evidence on the association between CGM-derived TIR and DKD in adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current evidence.

MethodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Scopus were searched through March, 2026. Eligible studies were studies in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes that reported an association between CGM-derived TIR and any DKD outcome (albuminuria, eGFR decline, or composite nephropathy) with a quantifiable per-unit effect estimate. Random-effects meta-analysis (REML with Knapp-Hartung adjustment) pooled odds ratios per 10% TIR increment. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-E and certainty of evidence using the GRADE framework. PROSPERO: CRD420261377763.

ResultsEleven studies (n = 7,182; seven T2D, four T1D; ten cross-sectional, one retrospective cohort) were included. The pooled OR per 10% TIR was 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.95; P = 0.002; I{superscript 2} = 69.6%), and every leave-one-out iteration preserved significance (OR range 0.88-0.91; all P [≤] 0.005). In the four studies adjusting for HbA1c, the association persisted (OR 0.91, 0.86-0.97; P = 0.015) with no detectable residual heterogeneity (I{superscript 2} = 0%), indicating the signal is not fully attributable to average glycemia.

ConclusionsHigher CGM-derived TIR may be associated with lower odds of DKD (OR 0.89 per 10% increment). The HbA1c-adjusted subgroup (k = 4; I{superscript 2} = 0%) provided the most internally consistent signal, though its small size limits inference. Prospective studies with standardized CGM protocols and pre-specified hard kidney endpoints are needed to establish causality.

Related

  1. Expert consensus identifies priorities for continuous prosthetic health monitoring in diabetic amputees
    Mohammed Q. Abdulhasan, Jumaa S. Chiad, Firas M. Abdulghani
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  2. Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Metabolic Phenotyping and Precision Nutrition: Current Evidence, Clinical Applications and Future Perspectives
    Liora Colobatiu, Romolica Mihaiu, Alexandra Pusta +1
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Continuous glucose monitoring after discontinuation of incretin-based obesity pharmacotherapy: indirect evidence and a research framework for metabolic stability and weight maintenance
    Andrijana Koceva, Andrej Janez, Mojca Jensterle
    Frontiers in endocrinologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMC
  4. Association of an almond-based low-carbohydrate diet with continuous glucose monitoring metrics in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial.
    Xianming Li, Yanqin Xu, Xulin Wang +3
    Nutrition & diabetesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPhysiologyEurope PMCDOAJ
  5. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of continuous glucose monitoring compared to self-monitoring of blood glucose on glycemic control and maternal and infant outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus
    Lin Zheng, Run Tian, Lulu Zhang +2
    BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsPMC
BibTeX
@misc{lodha2026association,
  title = {{Association Between Continuous Glucose Monitoring - Derived Time in Range and Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of current evidence}},
  author = {S. M. Lodha and S. Kumar and S. Acharya and P. Dhamelia and S. Garg},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.21.26363573},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.21.26363573v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Association Between Continuous Glucose Monitoring - Derived Time in Range and Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of current evidence
AU  - S. M. Lodha
AU  - S. Kumar
AU  - S. Acharya
AU  - P. Dhamelia
AU  - S. Garg
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/21
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.21.26363573
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.21.26363573v1
AB  - BackgroundContinuous glucose monitoring-derived time in range (TIR; glucose 70-180 mg/dL) has emerged as a complementary glycemic metric, but its association with DKD (Diabetic Kidney Disease) has not been systematically quantified. We aimed to synthesize the evidence on the association between CGM-derived TIR and DKD in adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current evidence.  MethodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Scopus were searched through March, 2026. Eligible studies were studies in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes that reported an association between CGM-derived TIR and any DKD outcome (albuminuria, eGFR decline, or composite nephropathy) with a quantifiable per-unit effect estimate. Random-effects meta-analysis (REML with Knapp-Hartung adjustment) pooled odds ratios per 10% TIR increment. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-E and certainty of evidence using the GRADE framework. PROSPERO: CRD420261377763.  ResultsEleven studies (n = 7,182; seven T2D, four T1D; ten cross-sectional, one retrospective cohort) were included. The pooled OR per 10% TIR was 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.95; P = 0.002; I{superscript 2} = 69.6%), and every leave-one-out iteration preserved significance (OR range 0.88-0.91; all P [≤] 0.005). In the four studies adjusting for HbA1c, the association persisted (OR 0.91, 0.86-0.97; P = 0.015) with no detectable residual heterogeneity (I{superscript 2} = 0%), indicating the signal is not fully attributable to average glycemia.  ConclusionsHigher CGM-derived TIR may be associated with lower odds of DKD (OR 0.89 per 10% increment). The HbA1c-adjusted subgroup (k = 4; I{superscript 2} = 0%) provided the most internally consistent signal, though its small size limits inference. Prospective studies with standardized CGM protocols and pre-specified hard kidney endpoints are needed to establish causality.
ER  -