Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 35 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0OSF Preprints

Scoping Review (2019 to 2024) Suggests Significant Variation in, and Poor Reporting of, Anesthesia Practices in Model Insects

Abstract

Although insect researchers are not legally mandated to follow the 3Rs, the precautionary use of pain reduction methods like anesthesia may be an important research refinement, especially given increasing evidence that pain is plausible in some insects. This review aimed to determine if and how insect researchers working with ten model species use anesthetics in the lab. We searched four databases for publications on each model species that contained a mention of anesthesia, with the agent named, from 2019-2024. Then, we confirmed whether anesthesia was used for putative pain reduction or loss of consciousness purposes in a laboratory setting. Papers that met these criteria were found for five species: the western honey bee, migratory locust, house cricket, black soldier fly, and fruit fly. Cold was reported as an anesthetic method for all five species. Isoflurane, sevoflurane, carbon dioxide, desflurane, halothane, flyNap (triethylamine), dyclonine, etomidate, ketamine, 2,6-diisopropyl phenol, propofol, tricaine mesylate, chloroform, xenon, eugenol, alcohol, ether, and nitrogen gas were also reported (mostly, in fruit flies). The majority of studies did not report exposure procedure, anesthetic dose or exposure time; when reported, these details varied widely, suggesting a lack of standardization in anesthesia protocols. Further, 24.2% of anesthetic-records used cold, an anesthesia method not recommended by veterinarians for invasive procedures in insects. Overall, our review suggests standardized, species-specific anesthesia protocols could improve scientific reproducibility and refine insect experimentation.

Related

  1. Phenotypic and genetic variation among Rhododendron arboreum species complex widely distributed throughout the Himalayas suggests an obscure geographic origin of the clade
    Shuichi Noshiro, Hiroshi Ikeda, Diego Tavares Vasques +5
    Annals of BotanyPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textEvolutionary biologyPMC
  2. Beyond elevation: climate, geography, and the diversification of Himalayan Rhododendrons. A commentary on ‘Phenotypic and genetic variation among Rhododendron arboreum species complex widely distributed throughout the Himalayas suggests an obscure geographic origin of the clade’
    Dinesh Thakur, Manish Kumar Sharma, Nikita Rathore
    Annals of BotanyPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textEvolutionary biologyPMC
  3. Modeling of the human rhinovirus C capsid suggests possible causes for antiviral drug resistance
    H. A. Basta, S. Ashraf, J. Y. Sgro +3
    VirologyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text24 citedMicrobiologyHAL
  4. Structural and functional analysis of the cerato-platanin-like effector protein Cpl1 suggests diverging functions in smut fungi
    Felix Dempwolff, Wieland Steinchen, Sven-Andreas Freibert +5
    BioRxivPreprintLicence not statedStructural biologyGeneral biologyHAL
  5. Factors associated with significant fibrosis and MASH in a diabetic Caribbean population of the French West Indies
    Moana Gelu-Simeon, Bernard Bhakkan-Mambir, Lucie Catherine +5
    Clinics and Research in Hepatology and GastroenterologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL
BibTeX
@misc{durosaro2026scoping,
  title = {{Scoping Review (2019 to 2024) Suggests Significant Variation in, and Poor Reporting of, Anesthesia Practices in Model Insects}},
  author = {Samuel Olutunde Durosaro and Meghan Barrett},
  howpublished = {OSF Preprints},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.31219/osf.io/e7hpc_v4},
  url = {https://osf.io/e7hpc_v4/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Scoping Review (2019 to 2024) Suggests Significant Variation in, and Poor Reporting of, Anesthesia Practices in Model Insects
AU  - Samuel Olutunde Durosaro
AU  - Meghan Barrett
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
PB  - OSF Preprints
DO  - 10.31219/osf.io/e7hpc_v4
UR  - https://osf.io/e7hpc_v4/
AB  - Although insect researchers are not legally mandated to follow the 3Rs, the precautionary use of pain reduction methods like anesthesia may be an important research refinement, especially given increasing evidence that pain is plausible in some insects. This review aimed to determine if and how insect researchers working with ten model species use anesthetics in the lab. We searched four databases for publications on each model species that contained a mention of anesthesia, with the agent named, from 2019-2024. Then, we confirmed whether anesthesia was used for putative pain reduction or loss of consciousness purposes in a laboratory setting. Papers that met these criteria were found for five species: the western honey bee, migratory locust, house cricket, black soldier fly, and fruit fly. Cold was reported as an anesthetic method for all five species. Isoflurane, sevoflurane, carbon dioxide, desflurane, halothane, flyNap (triethylamine), dyclonine, etomidate, ketamine, 2,6-diisopropyl phenol, propofol, tricaine mesylate, chloroform, xenon, eugenol, alcohol, ether, and nitrogen gas were also reported (mostly, in fruit flies). The majority of studies did not report exposure procedure, anesthetic dose or exposure time; when reported, these details varied widely, suggesting a lack of standardization in anesthesia protocols. Further, 24.2% of anesthetic-records used cold, an anesthesia method not recommended by veterinarians for invasive procedures in insects. Overall, our review suggests standardized, species-specific anesthesia protocols could improve scientific reproducibility and refine insect experimentation.
ER  -