Complex coordination through partner choice in baboons (Papio papio)
Abstract
Coordination is a cornerstone of social life, enabling individuals to achieve collective goals and maintain group cohesion. In non-human primates, coordination can rely on flexible partner-dependent strategies, but the interplay between these strategies and partner choice remains poorly understood. Here, we introduced a complex anti-matching coordination task to a group of Guinea baboons (Papio papio), requiring individuals to select a different stimulus from their partner to be rewarded. We compared their performance with a previously studied matching task, where selecting the same stimulus as their partner was rewarded. While baboons adapted to both tasks, increasing their success rate over time, we found little evidence of partner-dependent strategies. Instead, they primarily relied on partner choice: individuals reorganized their social interactions to engage with compatible partners, avoiding those with conflicting strategies. This reorganization was particularly pronounced in the anti-matching phase, where partner choice was critical to maintain high performance. Our results demonstrate that, when possible, baboons prefer partner choice over partner dependent strategies to solve coordination problems. This highlights the importance of social flexibility and individual differences in shaping coordination outcomes, offering new insights into the cognitive and social mechanisms underpinning flexible cooperation in non-human primates.
Related
- Genetic Dissection of Pea Nodulated Root Architecture and Early Rhizobial Partner Choice Across a Diverse 335-Line Panel
- Global statistical constraint and local partner-sensitive inference support dynamic, open-ended verbal coordination
- Friend advice influences mate choice through brain-to-brain synchrony and computational decision processes
- Probing Physical Intuition in Large Language Models through Partner-Dependent Mutation Prediction
- MAFA drives pancreatic islet maturation through coordination of cell growth, metabolic maturation, and resilience to stress.
BibTeX
@misc{claidiere2026complex,
title = {{Complex coordination through partner choice in baboons (Papio papio)}},
author = {Nicolas Claidière and Constantin Montel and Tatsuya Kameda and Yohsuke Ohtsubo and fagot joel},
howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.31234/osf.io/7zctw_v1},
url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/7zctw_v1/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Complex coordination through partner choice in baboons (Papio papio)
AU - Nicolas Claidière
AU - Constantin Montel
AU - Tatsuya Kameda
AU - Yohsuke Ohtsubo
AU - fagot joel
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/28
PB - PsyArXiv
DO - 10.31234/osf.io/7zctw_v1
UR - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/7zctw_v1/
AB - Coordination is a cornerstone of social life, enabling individuals to achieve collective goals and maintain group cohesion. In non-human primates, coordination can rely on flexible partner-dependent strategies, but the interplay between these strategies and partner choice remains poorly understood. Here, we introduced a complex anti-matching coordination task to a group of Guinea baboons (Papio papio), requiring individuals to select a different stimulus from their partner to be rewarded. We compared their performance with a previously studied matching task, where selecting the same stimulus as their partner was rewarded. While baboons adapted to both tasks, increasing their success rate over time, we found little evidence of partner-dependent strategies. Instead, they primarily relied on partner choice: individuals reorganized their social interactions to engage with compatible partners, avoiding those with conflicting strategies. This reorganization was particularly pronounced in the anti-matching phase, where partner choice was critical to maintain high performance. Our results demonstrate that, when possible, baboons prefer partner choice over partner dependent strategies to solve coordination problems. This highlights the importance of social flexibility and individual differences in shaping coordination outcomes, offering new insights into the cognitive and social mechanisms underpinning flexible cooperation in non-human primates.
ER -