Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 28 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Variable Bound Tightening for Nash Equilibrium Computation in Multiplayer Imperfect-Information Games

Abstract

There has been significant recent progress in algorithms for approximation of Nash equilibrium in large two-player zero-sum imperfect-information games and exact computation of Nash equilibrium in multiplayer strategic-form games. While counterfactual regret minimization and fictitious play are scalable to large games and have convergence guarantees in two-player zero-sum games, they do not guarantee convergence to Nash equilibrium in multiplayer games. Recently, an approach has been presented for exact computation of Nash equilibrium in multiplayer imperfect-information games that solves a quadratically constrained program based on a nonlinear complementarity problem formulation derived from the sequence-form game representation. This formulation was solved using Gurobi's nonconvex quadratic solver, which employs spatial branch-and-bound to iteratively refine variable bounds by solving convex relaxations of bilinear terms. During presolve, Gurobi introduces auxiliary variables and, in some cases, binary variables, leading to an internal mixed-integer quadratically constrained program. This approach was demonstrated to outperform prior algorithms from the Gambit software suite and quickly solve three-player Kuhn poker after removal of dominated actions; however, the algorithm was not able to solve the full version of the game within 24 hours. In this paper, we derive finite bounds on slack and multiplier variables in the nonlinear complementarity formulation. These bounds can strengthen the convex relaxations used within spatial branch-and-bound. We compare uniform corollary bounds with finer proposition-based bounds on full three-player Kuhn poker. All eight bounded configurations return numerically verified equilibria in under 17 seconds, while the unbounded formulation finds no feasible solution within 300 seconds. The finest bounds do not consistently yield the fastest computation.

Related

  1. Physical Muon: Orthogonalization as an Equilibrium Computation
    Yuren Hao
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Information-Computation Inversion in Pseudo-Marginal MCMC
    Zihan Xu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. An information-geometric formulation of distributed computation
    Alberto Liardi, George Blackburne, Pedro A. M. Mediano
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  4. First-Order Optimization under Uniform Nondegeneracy: Geometry, Computation, and Information
    Hua Su, Lei Zhang, Jin Zhao
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. Slow Beats Fast at the Kesten-Stigum Threshold: Minimax, Fisher-Information and Belief-Propagation Characterizations of the Information-Computation Gap in Sparse Stochastic Block Models
    Soroor Ghandali
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{ganzfried2026variable,
  title = {{Variable Bound Tightening for Nash Equilibrium Computation in Multiplayer Imperfect-Information Games}},
  author = {Sam Ganzfried},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2606.25997},
  eprint = {2606.25997},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.25997},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Variable Bound Tightening for Nash Equilibrium Computation in Multiplayer Imperfect-Information Games
AU  - Sam Ganzfried
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/04
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2606.25997
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.25997
AB  - There has been significant recent progress in algorithms for approximation of Nash equilibrium in large two-player zero-sum imperfect-information games and exact computation of Nash equilibrium in multiplayer strategic-form games. While counterfactual regret minimization and fictitious play are scalable to large games and have convergence guarantees in two-player zero-sum games, they do not guarantee convergence to Nash equilibrium in multiplayer games. Recently, an approach has been presented for exact computation of Nash equilibrium in multiplayer imperfect-information games that solves a quadratically constrained program based on a nonlinear complementarity problem formulation derived from the sequence-form game representation. This formulation was solved using Gurobi's nonconvex quadratic solver, which employs spatial branch-and-bound to iteratively refine variable bounds by solving convex relaxations of bilinear terms. During presolve, Gurobi introduces auxiliary variables and, in some cases, binary variables, leading to an internal mixed-integer quadratically constrained program. This approach was demonstrated to outperform prior algorithms from the Gambit software suite and quickly solve three-player Kuhn poker after removal of dominated actions; however, the algorithm was not able to solve the full version of the game within 24 hours. In this paper, we derive finite bounds on slack and multiplier variables in the nonlinear complementarity formulation. These bounds can strengthen the convex relaxations used within spatial branch-and-bound. We compare uniform corollary bounds with finer proposition-based bounds on full three-player Kuhn poker. All eight bounded configurations return numerically verified equilibria in under 17 seconds, while the unbounded formulation finds no feasible solution within 300 seconds. The finest bounds do not consistently yield the fastest computation.
ER  -