Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 40 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Orthopaedic Surgery

Staged Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Targeting Driver and Compensatory Structural Segments for Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: A Novel Strategy and Early Outcomes

  1. 1Department of Orthopedics Forth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital Beijing China

Abstract

Objective: Traditional treatments for adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) often rely on highly morbid long‐segment fusions. While lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) provides a minimally invasive alternative, consensus on precise surgical targets is lacking. We propose a novel strategy targeting “driver” and “compensatory structural” segments to optimize surgical outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective review of 104 ADS patients (2023–2024) compared this targeted LLIF strategy (n = 64) to traditional posterior surgery (n = 40). The LLIF approach utilized staged procedures focusing exclusively on segments driving the primary deformity and rigid compensatory segments. We evaluated radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes (VAS, ODI, EQ‐5D).

Results: The LLIF group achieved significant deformity correction, with the coronal major Cobb angle decreasing from 24.73° to 10.76°, alongside marked improvements in sagittal alignment. Patients exhibited progressive self‐correction of coronal balance over the 1‐year follow‐up. Clinical scores (VAS, ODI, EQ‐5D) improved significantly. Compared to the traditional group, targeted LLIF resulted in significantly shorter operative times and less blood loss, with comparable overall complication rates (16.0% vs. 20.0%), although traditional surgery achieved superior immediate radiographic correction.

Conclusion: Targeting driver and compensatory structural segments via LLIF is an effective, minimally invasive strategy for ADS. It offers substantial deformity correction, symptom relief, and progressive postoperative self‐correction while significantly reducing surgical trauma compared to traditional long‐segment fusions.

Related

  1. Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Total Disc Replacement with a Viscoelastic Prosthesis for Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease in Young Adults: A Comparative Retrospective Cohort Study
    Clément Jacquemin, Matthieu Campana, Jean-Etienne Castelain +3
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Mini-open Transforaminal Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease
    Amit Sharma, Vijay Savankar, Arvind Vatkar +1
    Indian Spine JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaDOAJ
  3. Pre and postoperative perfusion MRI in degenerative cervical myelopathy suggest different patterns of pathophysiological compensatory mechanisms
    Kaissar Farah, Guillaume Frébourg, Lauriane Pini +5
    NeurochirurgiePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSystems & synthetic biologyMedical imaging & radiologyHAL
  4. Midterm Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Transarticular Trephonic Plasty-Assisted Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Xiaohao Sun, Junliang Xu, Yukai Cui +6
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. Biportal endoscopic versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Victoria Bieschke, Ali Daoud, Zeina Nasser +10
    Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{wen2026staged,
  title = {{Staged Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Targeting Driver and Compensatory Structural Segments for Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: A Novel Strategy and Early Outcomes}},
  author = {Tianyong Wen and Liukun Xu and Peng Lu and Yang Zhang and Wei Ji and Yang Zheng and Zhicheng Zhang and Tiansheng Sun},
  journal = {Orthopaedic Surgery},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1111/os.70435},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70435},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Staged Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Targeting Driver and Compensatory Structural Segments for Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: A Novel Strategy and Early Outcomes
AU  - Tianyong Wen
AU  - Liukun Xu
AU  - Peng Lu
AU  - Yang Zhang
AU  - Wei Ji
AU  - Yang Zheng
AU  - Zhicheng Zhang
AU  - Tiansheng Sun
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/25
JO  - Orthopaedic Surgery
DO  - 10.1111/os.70435
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70435
AB  - Objective: Traditional treatments for adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) often rely on highly morbid long‐segment fusions. While lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) provides a minimally invasive alternative, consensus on precise surgical targets is lacking. We propose a novel strategy targeting “driver” and “compensatory structural” segments to optimize surgical outcomes.  Methods: A retrospective review of 104 ADS patients (2023–2024) compared this targeted LLIF strategy (n = 64) to traditional posterior surgery (n = 40). The LLIF approach utilized staged procedures focusing exclusively on segments driving the primary deformity and rigid compensatory segments. We evaluated radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes (VAS, ODI, EQ‐5D).  Results: The LLIF group achieved significant deformity correction, with the coronal major Cobb angle decreasing from 24.73° to 10.76°, alongside marked improvements in sagittal alignment. Patients exhibited progressive self‐correction of coronal balance over the 1‐year follow‐up. Clinical scores (VAS, ODI, EQ‐5D) improved significantly. Compared to the traditional group, targeted LLIF resulted in significantly shorter operative times and less blood loss, with comparable overall complication rates (16.0% vs. 20.0%), although traditional surgery achieved superior immediate radiographic correction.  Conclusion: Targeting driver and compensatory structural segments via LLIF is an effective, minimally invasive strategy for ADS. It offers substantial deformity correction, symptom relief, and progressive postoperative self‐correction while significantly reducing surgical trauma compared to traditional long‐segment fusions.
SN  - 1757-7853
SN  - 1757-7861
ER  -