Console-Associated Surgical Workflow Performance in Vitreoretinal Surgery: A Comparative Time-and-Motion Study of UNITY VCS and CONSTELLATION Vision Systems
4 affiliations
- 1Retina Associates of Kentucky
- 2Retina Vitreous Associates Medical Group
- 3Alcon Vision LLC
- 4EVERSANA
Abstract
Introduction Vitreoretinal operating rooms face increasing challenges, including workforce shortages and growing patient demand from aging populations. This comparative time-and-motion study assessed if the UNITY® Vitreoretinal Cataract System (UNITY VCS) was associated with differences in console-associated workflow performance in vitreoretinal surgery compared with the CONSTELLATION® Vision System. Methods A prospective, observational, time-and-motion study using a sequential pre–post design was conducted at two sites from May 2024 through July 2025. Adult patients undergoing 25-gauge vitreoretinal surgery were enrolled and received surgery with either the CONSTELLATION or UNITY VCS. The primary endpoint was the duration of console-associated vitreoretinal surgical workflow. Microscope recordings and dedicated operating room (OR) cameras were used to capture surgical steps and timecodes. Data were analyzed using independent t tests with multiplicity adjustment, and mixed-effects models accounting for site and surgeon clustering were used to confirm findings. Results UNITY VCS was associated with a significantly shorter duration of console-associated vitreoretinal surgical workflow compared with CONSTELLATION (27.3 vs. 32.4 min; absolute mean difference, 5.1 min [95% CI 0.5–9.7]; 16% relative difference; p = 0.029). UNITY VCS was also associated with shorter durations in workflow steps, including setup, teardown, and turnover—as well as in laser photocoagulation (all p < 0.001). Findings from mixed-effects models accounting for clustering by site and surgeon were consistent with the primary analysis. Conclusions This real-world study found that UNITY VCS was associated with improved console-associated vitreoretinal workflow performance compared with CONSTELLATION. The observed differences were concentrated in OR staff activities and device-enabled workflow components rather than surgeon-controlled operative work. These findings may be operationally relevant for high-volume practices seeking to optimize surgical workflows and address growing demand from an aging patient population. Further studies are needed to evaluate the broader operational implications of these workflow improvements.
Related
- Comparative performance of Gemini and DeepSeek large language models in surgical decision support for mastoidectomy in chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma.
- Comparative performance of mSOFA, APACHE II, APPS, and MPM II scores in predicting mortality among mechanically ventilated surgical ICU patients: a prospective cohort study
- Illumination systems in vitreoretinal surgery: a comparative review of safety and efficacy
- Surgical approach and insert constraint are associated with small differences in patellar tilt after robotic‐assisted total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective comparative radiographic study
- Comparative Performance of the ANCLA Risk Score and Established Prognostic Models for Predicting ESKD in ANCA-Associated Glomerulonephritis: A Latin American Cohort.
BibTeX
@article{busquets2026consoleassociated,
title = {{Console-Associated Surgical Workflow Performance in Vitreoretinal Surgery: A Comparative Time-and-Motion Study of UNITY VCS and CONSTELLATION Vision Systems}},
author = {Miguel Busquets and John Kitchens and Richard H. Roe and Mukesh Dhariwal and Elizabeth Persaud and Joshua Rychlik and Yuta Inoue and Rahul S. Iyengar and Andrew Kim and Inmo Kang and Rene Perez and Firas M. Rahhal},
journal = {Ophthalmology and Therapy},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1007/s40123-026-01500-3},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-026-01500-3},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Console-Associated Surgical Workflow Performance in Vitreoretinal Surgery: A Comparative Time-and-Motion Study of UNITY VCS and CONSTELLATION Vision Systems
AU - Miguel Busquets
AU - John Kitchens
AU - Richard H. Roe
AU - Mukesh Dhariwal
AU - Elizabeth Persaud
AU - Joshua Rychlik
AU - Yuta Inoue
AU - Rahul S. Iyengar
AU - Andrew Kim
AU - Inmo Kang
AU - Rene Perez
AU - Firas M. Rahhal
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/01
JO - Ophthalmology and Therapy
DO - 10.1007/s40123-026-01500-3
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-026-01500-3
AB - Introduction Vitreoretinal operating rooms face increasing challenges, including workforce shortages and growing patient demand from aging populations. This comparative time-and-motion study assessed if the UNITY® Vitreoretinal Cataract System (UNITY VCS) was associated with differences in console-associated workflow performance in vitreoretinal surgery compared with the CONSTELLATION® Vision System. Methods A prospective, observational, time-and-motion study using a sequential pre–post design was conducted at two sites from May 2024 through July 2025. Adult patients undergoing 25-gauge vitreoretinal surgery were enrolled and received surgery with either the CONSTELLATION or UNITY VCS. The primary endpoint was the duration of console-associated vitreoretinal surgical workflow. Microscope recordings and dedicated operating room (OR) cameras were used to capture surgical steps and timecodes. Data were analyzed using independent t tests with multiplicity adjustment, and mixed-effects models accounting for site and surgeon clustering were used to confirm findings. Results UNITY VCS was associated with a significantly shorter duration of console-associated vitreoretinal surgical workflow compared with CONSTELLATION (27.3 vs. 32.4 min; absolute mean difference, 5.1 min [95% CI 0.5–9.7]; 16% relative difference; p = 0.029). UNITY VCS was also associated with shorter durations in workflow steps, including setup, teardown, and turnover—as well as in laser photocoagulation (all p < 0.001). Findings from mixed-effects models accounting for clustering by site and surgeon were consistent with the primary analysis. Conclusions This real-world study found that UNITY VCS was associated with improved console-associated vitreoretinal workflow performance compared with CONSTELLATION. The observed differences were concentrated in OR staff activities and device-enabled workflow components rather than surgeon-controlled operative work. These findings may be operationally relevant for high-volume practices seeking to optimize surgical workflows and address growing demand from an aging patient population. Further studies are needed to evaluate the broader operational implications of these workflow improvements.
SN - 2193-8245
SN - 2193-6528
ER -