Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 47 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYCureus

Evaluating Tobacco Use Among United States Air Force Military Trainees: A Narrative Review of the Literature From 1998 to 2020

5 affiliations
  1. 1Addiction Medicine, Hackensack Meridian Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, USA
  2. 2Addiction Medicine, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, USA
  3. 3Biology, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, USA
  4. 4Family Medicine, Indiana Regional Medical Center, Indiana, USA
  5. 5Radiology, Cape Fear Valley Medical Center, Fayetteville, USA

Abstract

Tobacco use remains a health and readiness concern among military personnel. In the United States Air Force (USAF), mandatory tobacco abstinence during Basic Military Training (BMT) does not necessarily translate into sustained abstinence after training. This narrative review examines tobacco use among USAF trainees before and after BMT, factors associated with initiation and reinitiation, and prevention interventions during the transition to technical training.

PubMed was searched in 2024 for literature published from January 1998 through December 2020. Search terms addressed the Air Force and military training, tobacco and nicotine products, and prevention and cessation. One reviewer screened publications for eligibility, and 20 research studies were selected for narrative synthesis. Relevant literature on other military populations provided background. No new participants were enrolled, and no meta-analysis or formal risk-of-bias assessment was conducted.

The reviewed studies documented tobacco use before enlistment and initiation or reinitiation after mandatory abstinence. Findings highlighted prior tobacco use, intentions to use tobacco, peer influence, perceived harm, and access to products during technical training. Brief tobacco interventions improved some short-term beliefs, knowledge, and intentions, but the principal three-group trial did not demonstrate a significant difference in tobacco use between intervention groups at three months.

These historical findings support continued tobacco-prevention efforts beyond BMT, with attention to prior users and nonusers, multiple tobacco and nicotine products, social influences, and access both on and off base. Interpretation is limited by single-reviewer screening, the unavailable original executable search string, and the restriction to literature published through 2020.

Related

  1. A focused PubMed artificial intelligence search program creates better literature reviews than general purpose artificial intelligence and is comparable to trainees in shoulder and elbow surgery
    James S. MacLeod, Michael S. Lee, Hayden Baker +3
    JSES internationalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  2. Bilateral Femoral Neck Stress Fractures in a Healthy Young Military Report and Review of Literature.
    Aneesa Jones, John Floyd
    Journal of orthopaedic case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  3. Evaluating Healthcare Center Staff Attitudes Toward Adoption of Tobacco-Free Policies and Concurrent Tobacco Use and Behavioral Health Treatment in Rural and Medically Underserved Areas of Texas.
    Tarik D Goulbourne, Isabel Martinez Leal, Maggie Britton +6
    Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textPhysiologyEurope PMC
  4. Clinical recognition, management, and research progress of infantile perianal protrusion: a narrative review and literature-based case aggregation
    Lintao Liu, Liyun Xia, Shuangai Liu +1
    Frontiers in pediatricsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Current applications of transauricular vagus nerve stimulation in orthopedics: a narrative review of the literature
    Petros Kitsis, Thea Zisimou, Egor Kostin +3
    Annals of medicine and surgery (2012)Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{chhatpar2026evaluating,
  title = {{Evaluating Tobacco Use Among United States Air Force Military Trainees: A Narrative Review of the Literature From 1998 to 2020}},
  author = {Parul Chhatpar and Mohit Chhatpar and Catherine Martsolf and Greg Doke and Nidhi Charan and Hythem Bishtawi},
  journal = {Cureus},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.7759/cureus.117320},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13723299},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Evaluating Tobacco Use Among United States Air Force Military Trainees: A Narrative Review of the Literature From 1998 to 2020
AU  - Parul Chhatpar
AU  - Mohit Chhatpar
AU  - Catherine Martsolf
AU  - Greg Doke
AU  - Nidhi Charan
AU  - Hythem Bishtawi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Cureus
DO  - 10.7759/cureus.117320
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13723299
AB  - Tobacco use remains a health and readiness concern among military personnel. In the United States Air Force (USAF), mandatory tobacco abstinence during Basic Military Training (BMT) does not necessarily translate into sustained abstinence after training. This narrative review examines tobacco use among USAF trainees before and after BMT, factors associated with initiation and reinitiation, and prevention interventions during the transition to technical training.  PubMed was searched in 2024 for literature published from January 1998 through December 2020. Search terms addressed the Air Force and military training, tobacco and nicotine products, and prevention and cessation. One reviewer screened publications for eligibility, and 20 research studies were selected for narrative synthesis. Relevant literature on other military populations provided background. No new participants were enrolled, and no meta-analysis or formal risk-of-bias assessment was conducted.  The reviewed studies documented tobacco use before enlistment and initiation or reinitiation after mandatory abstinence. Findings highlighted prior tobacco use, intentions to use tobacco, peer influence, perceived harm, and access to products during technical training. Brief tobacco interventions improved some short-term beliefs, knowledge, and intentions, but the principal three-group trial did not demonstrate a significant difference in tobacco use between intervention groups at three months.  These historical findings support continued tobacco-prevention efforts beyond BMT, with attention to prior users and nonusers, multiple tobacco and nicotine products, social influences, and access both on and off base. Interpretation is limited by single-reviewer screening, the unavailable original executable search string, and the restriction to literature published through 2020.
SN  - 2168-8184
ER  -