Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 11 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Frozen in Time: How a Physics Foundation Model Forgets Under Sim-to-Real Adaptation

Abstract

Scientific foundation models (SciFMs) have achieved remarkable performance on a wide range of PDEs, including the ability to efficiently adapt to unseen data distributions with additional finetuning. As with all neural architectures, finetuning such models comes with the risk of catastrophic forgetting, whereby adapting to new tasks degrades prior knowledge of the model. We study catastrophic forgetting in Walrus-1.3B, a SciFM for continuum dynamics, over the course of a two-stage sim-to-real adaptation: first finetuning on simulated flow around a cylinder and then adapting to experimental data of the same system. We find that finetuning on the simulations rapidly degrades rollout performance on the original pretraining datasets, with one-step errors increasing up to 35x after just 20 epochs. Subsequent adaptation to real data further erodes performance on the simulated task. We characterize the potential drivers of forgetting, such as dataset dependence and task representation similarity. We then show that replaying as little as 1% simulated data during real-data finetuning recovers most of the lost simulation performance while retaining effective adaptation to the experimental dynamics. Our results identify catastrophic forgetting as a practical obstacle to sim-to-real adaptation of SciFMs and show that lightweight replay strategies significantly improve retention.

Related

  1. Physics Foundation Models for Efficient Control of Fluid Flows
    Mahindra Rautela, Shaifalee Saxena, Alexander Scheinker
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textFluid dynamicsarXiv
  2. Circular orbits and particle collisions in the space-time of boson stars and their frozen states
    Maria Chivers, Betti Hartmann, Katherine Horton +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGravitation & general relativityHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  3. Track finding and particle identification performance with particle physics foundation models
    Shuhang Li, Haiwang Yu, Gabor Galgoczi +9
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textComputational physicsHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  4. Leveraging Industrial Foundation Models at the Edge of Particle Physics Detectors via Distillation Learning and Hardware Co-design
    Gia Ancone, Qibin Liu, Liangyu Wu +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textApplied physics & instrumentationHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  5. Panda Diplomacy: Foundation Model Pre-training across Particle Imaging Detectors for High Energy and Nuclear Physics
    Samuel Young, César Jesús-Valls, Kazuhiro Terao
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{mian2026frozen,
  title = {{Frozen in Time: How a Physics Foundation Model Forgets Under Sim-to-Real Adaptation}},
  author = {Haaris Mian and Miles Cranmer and Alessandro Favero and Payel Mukhopadhyay},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.40857},
  eprint = {2610.40857},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40857},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Frozen in Time: How a Physics Foundation Model Forgets Under Sim-to-Real Adaptation
AU  - Haaris Mian
AU  - Miles Cranmer
AU  - Alessandro Favero
AU  - Payel Mukhopadhyay
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.40857
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40857
AB  - Scientific foundation models (SciFMs) have achieved remarkable performance on a wide range of PDEs, including the ability to efficiently adapt to unseen data distributions with additional finetuning. As with all neural architectures, finetuning such models comes with the risk of catastrophic forgetting, whereby adapting to new tasks degrades prior knowledge of the model. We study catastrophic forgetting in Walrus-1.3B, a SciFM for continuum dynamics, over the course of a two-stage sim-to-real adaptation: first finetuning on simulated flow around a cylinder and then adapting to experimental data of the same system. We find that finetuning on the simulations rapidly degrades rollout performance on the original pretraining datasets, with one-step errors increasing up to 35x after just 20 epochs. Subsequent adaptation to real data further erodes performance on the simulated task. We characterize the potential drivers of forgetting, such as dataset dependence and task representation similarity. We then show that replaying as little as 1% simulated data during real-data finetuning recovers most of the lost simulation performance while retaining effective adaptation to the experimental dynamics. Our results identify catastrophic forgetting as a practical obstacle to sim-to-real adaptation of SciFMs and show that lightweight replay strategies significantly improve retention.
ER  -