Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 14 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Phase-Drift Limits and Adaptive Quadrature Readout in Programmable Photonic Processors

Abstract

Phase fluctuations between optical inputs limit programmable photonic processors because their output powers depend on coherent interference. We study the phase-drift penalty that arises when sine and cosine quadratures are measured sequentially rather than simultaneously. The analysis is motivated by measurements from an eight-mode programmable photonic processor, including 35 free-running recordings of 300 s acquired at approximately 125 samples per second per channel. These recordings provide an empirical route for estimating the phase-increment variance at a selected reconfiguration interval. The estimate is defined at the time of the second measurement. For fixed quadrature order, perturbation of the atan2 reconstruction gives eC→ S=−δτsin2ϕ0+O(δτ2) and eS→ C=−δτcos2ϕ0+O(δτ2). Writing Qτ=Var(δτ), uniform phase averaging gives the first-order drift mean-square error 3Qτ/8. A phase-predicted ordering rule measures the locally less informative quadrature first and the more informative quadrature second. Its uniform first-order penalty is (3/8−1/π)Qτ, which is 84.9 percent below the fixed-order value. We also derive an increment-aware estimator from a local state-space model. Marginalizing the unknown phase increment increases the variance of a stale phase observation by Qτ, reducing its Fisher information from I to I/(1+IQτ). For ideal balanced Poisson detection, the Fisher information of each quadrature equals its detected signal-photon number. This yields dimensionless architecture boundaries in spatial information and phase-increment variance. Nonlinear Monte Carlo simulations validate the perturbative laws, quantify robustness to prediction error, and compare simultaneous, fixed-order, increment-aware, and adaptive receivers under a common noise model.

Related

  1. Floquet-driven light transport in programmable photonic processors via discretized evolution of synthetic magnetic fields
    Andrea Cataldo, Rohan Yadgirkar, Ze-Sheng Xu +5
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textOptics & photonicsQuantum physics & quantum informationHAL
  2. Interferometric Readout of Momentum-Space Topology in a Programmable Dissipative Photonic Circuit
    Andrea Cataldo, Emil J. Bergholtz, Daniel Leykam +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCondensed matterOptics & photonicsarXiv
  3. Adaptive Relational Learning on Multi-instance Quantum Data with Photonic Processors
    Marcin Jastrzebski, Shang Yu, Raj B. Patel +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCondensed matterOptics & photonicsarXiv
  4. Information capacity of quantum statistics: Fock-state tests of a discrete binary-sequence model on cloud photonic quantum processors
    Chiran Wijesundara, Octavia T. Volpe, Dejan Stojkovic +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textComputational physicsGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  5. Spectral Optimization of Programmable LED Illumination for Smartphone-Based Colorimetric Biosensor Readout.
    Elena Serea, Codrin Donciu, Marinel Costel Temneanu
    BiosensorsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textAtomic, molecular & optical physicsEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{elmas2026phasedrift,
  title = {{Phase-Drift Limits and Adaptive Quadrature Readout in Programmable Photonic Processors}},
  author = {Gökhan Elmas and Igor A. Litvin and Janis Nötzel},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.02249},
  eprint = {2608.02249},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.02249},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Phase-Drift Limits and Adaptive Quadrature Readout in Programmable Photonic Processors
AU  - Gökhan Elmas
AU  - Igor A. Litvin
AU  - Janis Nötzel
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/19
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.02249
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.02249
AB  - Phase fluctuations between optical inputs limit programmable photonic processors because their output powers depend on coherent interference. We study the phase-drift penalty that arises when sine and cosine quadratures are measured sequentially rather than simultaneously. The analysis is motivated by measurements from an eight-mode programmable photonic processor, including 35 free-running recordings of 300 s acquired at approximately 125 samples per second per channel. These recordings provide an empirical route for estimating the phase-increment variance at a selected reconfiguration interval. The estimate is defined at the time of the second measurement. For fixed quadrature order, perturbation of the atan2 reconstruction gives e_C→ S=−δ_τsin^2ϕ_0+O(δ_τ^2) and e_S→ C=−δ_τcos^2ϕ_0+O(δ_τ^2). Writing Q_τ=Var(δ_τ), uniform phase averaging gives the first-order drift mean-square error 3Q_τ/8. A phase-predicted ordering rule measures the locally less informative quadrature first and the more informative quadrature second. Its uniform first-order penalty is (3/8−1/π)Q_τ, which is 84.9 percent below the fixed-order value. We also derive an increment-aware estimator from a local state-space model. Marginalizing the unknown phase increment increases the variance of a stale phase observation by Q_τ, reducing its Fisher information from I to I/(1+IQ_τ). For ideal balanced Poisson detection, the Fisher information of each quadrature equals its detected signal-photon number. This yields dimensionless architecture boundaries in spatial information and phase-increment variance. Nonlinear Monte Carlo simulations validate the perturbative laws, quantify robustness to prediction error, and compare simultaneous, fixed-order, increment-aware, and adaptive receivers under a common noise model.
ER  -