Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Compatible Bases and Actuator Scheduling

Abstract

We study a constrained basis-selection problem for an ordered block matrix B=[ B1|⋯| Bn ]. The successive tail matrices determine a nested family of column spaces, and we consider bases of representatives which are compatible with this induced flag. Our main linear-algebraic result shows that, among bases of representatives, compatibility with the entire flag is characterized by the intrinsic block quotas rk=wk−wk+1, where wk is the rank of the k-th tail matrix. We then show that the same structure arises naturally in finite-horizon linear control. For the reachability matrix [AN−1G| ⋯| G], requiring every actuator to be used exactly once turns an actuator schedule into a representative system. Preservation of the complete reachability profile is then equivalent to compatibility with the tail-space flag. This correspondence leads to an exact depth-first search with a future-rank pruning criterion. For an explicit structured family and a fixed search ordering, the baseline search visits 3·2m+m−2 nodes before the first solution, whereas future-rank pruning reduces this number to 3m+1. Exact-arithmetic experiments reproduce these formulas for all tested instances.

Related

  1. Compatible additions on a six-element commutative semigroup: equational bases and subvariety lattices
    Lili Wang, Jinjing Wu, Aifa Wang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  2. Beyond Ellipsoids: Semi-Algebraic Tightening for Chance Constraints Under Actuator Saturation
    Carlo Karam, Mirko Fiacchini, Matteo Tacchi-Bénard
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlHALarXiv
  3. Optimal Actuator Design across Ranks and Control Horizons
    Emmanuel Trélat, Enrique Zuazua
    HALPreprintPublisher termsFull textOptimisation & controlHALarXiv
  4. Safety Verification for Voltage Control in Inverter Dominated Radial Distribution Networks under Actuator and Sensor Adversarial Attacks
    Georgios Pantazis, Revi Boelen, Michelle S. Chong
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. Fractional-Order Sliding-Mode Control of a Rail-Mounted Redundant SCARA Under Actuator Degradation and Elbow Locking: Truncated-Memory Analysis and a Reproducible Simulation Benchmark
    Claudio Urrea
    Fractal and FractionalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Analysis & PDEsCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{kedzierski2026compatible,
  title = {{Compatible Bases and Actuator Scheduling}},
  author = {Dawid E. Kędzierski and Piotr Krasoń},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.03353},
  eprint = {2610.03353},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.03353},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Compatible Bases and Actuator Scheduling
AU  - Dawid E. Kędzierski
AU  - Piotr Krasoń
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/02
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.03353
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.03353
AB  - We study a constrained basis-selection problem for an ordered block matrix B=[ B_1|⋯| B_n ]. The successive tail matrices determine a nested family of column spaces, and we consider bases of representatives which are compatible with this induced flag. Our main linear-algebraic result shows that, among bases of representatives, compatibility with the entire flag is characterized by the intrinsic block quotas r_k=w_k−w_k+1, where w_k is the rank of the k-th tail matrix. We then show that the same structure arises naturally in finite-horizon linear control. For the reachability matrix [A^N−1G| ⋯| G], requiring every actuator to be used exactly once turns an actuator schedule into a representative system. Preservation of the complete reachability profile is then equivalent to compatibility with the tail-space flag. This correspondence leads to an exact depth-first search with a future-rank pruning criterion. For an explicit structured family and a fixed search ordering, the baseline search visits 3·2^m+m−2 nodes before the first solution, whereas future-rank pruning reduces this number to 3m+1. Exact-arithmetic experiments reproduce these formulas for all tested instances.
ER  -