Attachment, grandiose and vulnerable narcissism, interpersonal competence, and problematic social media use: A latent profile analysis
- 1Department of Psychology, Longwood University, Farmville, Virginia, United States of America.
- 2Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Longwood University, Farmville, Virginia, United States of America.
Abstract
In a cross-sectional study we examined associations between attachment anxiety and avoidance, grandiose narcissism, vulnerable narcissism, interpersonal competence, and problematic social media use (PSMU) in order to enhance the understanding of the characteristics that may contribute to PSMU. Participants (N = 555) were recruited from social media and crowdsourcing apps and completed a self-report online questionnaire. Correlations between variables generally supported previous findings, with the exceptions of the negative association between grandiose narcissism and attachment avoidance, and the non-significant association between grandiose narcissism and PSMU. Latent profile analysis (LPA) produced four separate profiles distinguished by levels of attachment anxiety and avoidance characteristic of the secure, avoidant, anxious, and fearful attachment styles. The four profiles were also distinguished by unique combinations of grandiose narcissism, vulnerable narcissism, and interpersonal competence, and suggest differences between the anxious and fearful attachment styles that have been overlooked in previous studies. We validated the LPA results by comparing mean PSMU scores among the four profiles, revealing statistically significant differences between all four profiles. Securely attached participants reported the lowest level of PSMU, with increasing levels of PSMU reported by avoidant, anxious, and fearful participants.
Related
- The mediating role of empathy in the association between interpersonal communication competence and attitudes toward disability in higher education
- Reduced social brain coupling to others’ face threats in narcissism
- Grey voters and populist voting. The role of religiosity and national collective narcissism
- Infant-caregiver vocal contingency changes across varying interpersonal space
- Amplitude without phase: interpersonal movement coordination grades inter-brain coupling
BibTeX
@article{bjornsen2026attachment,
title = {{Attachment, grandiose and vulnerable narcissism, interpersonal competence, and problematic social media use: A latent profile analysis}},
author = {Chris A Bjornsen and Allen G Harbaugh},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0359569},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359569},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Attachment, grandiose and vulnerable narcissism, interpersonal competence, and problematic social media use: A latent profile analysis
AU - Chris A Bjornsen
AU - Allen G Harbaugh
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0359569
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359569
AB - In a cross-sectional study we examined associations between attachment anxiety and avoidance, grandiose narcissism, vulnerable narcissism, interpersonal competence, and problematic social media use (PSMU) in order to enhance the understanding of the characteristics that may contribute to PSMU. Participants (N = 555) were recruited from social media and crowdsourcing apps and completed a self-report online questionnaire. Correlations between variables generally supported previous findings, with the exceptions of the negative association between grandiose narcissism and attachment avoidance, and the non-significant association between grandiose narcissism and PSMU. Latent profile analysis (LPA) produced four separate profiles distinguished by levels of attachment anxiety and avoidance characteristic of the secure, avoidant, anxious, and fearful attachment styles. The four profiles were also distinguished by unique combinations of grandiose narcissism, vulnerable narcissism, and interpersonal competence, and suggest differences between the anxious and fearful attachment styles that have been overlooked in previous studies. We validated the LPA results by comparing mean PSMU scores among the four profiles, revealing statistically significant differences between all four profiles. Securely attached participants reported the lowest level of PSMU, with increasing levels of PSMU reported by avoidant, anxious, and fearful participants.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -