Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,788 studies31 sourcesUpdated 50 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Immunology

RNA therapeutics in rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and systemic sclerosis: a compartment-aware translational framework

  1. 1NOBELab (Nucleosides, Oligonucleotides, and Biological Evaluation Laboratory), Division of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Qarabağ University
  2. 2Division of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Qarabağ University
  3. 3Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Qarabağ University

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus/lupus nephritis (SLE/LN), and systemic sclerosis (SSc) remain major causes of chronic inflammation, disability, organ damage, and treatment burden despite therapeutic advances. RNA therapeutics offer programmable transcript suppression, network-level microRNA modulation, transient restoration of protective proteins, and targeting-ligand functions. Existing reviews largely catalogue modalities or individual delivery systems; this review instead asks whether a candidate forms an interpretable translational program across target biology, disease compartment, intended cell, productive intracellular access, direct target engagement, pathway pharmacodynamics, repeat-dose safety, and manufacturing feasibility. RA is primarily a synovial immune–stromal delivery problem in which RNA programs must also demonstrate an advantage over effective biologic or targeted synthetic therapies. SLE/LN offers interferon, B-cell, co-stimulatory, microRNA, messenger RNA (mRNA), and complement opportunities, but therapeutic nucleic acids and carriers must not intensify nucleic-acid sensing, interferon activity, or complement-associated injury. SSc combines strong antifibrotic RNA biology with an accessible skin proof-of-mechanism window, whereas lung, vascular, and internal-organ programs remain more delivery-limited. We separate human pathway validation, RNA-platform evidence outside the target disease, disease-specific RNA evidence, and patient efficacy. Recent human complement-factor-B pharmacodynamic data strengthen the platform-level evidence but do not establish efficacy in RA or LN. The most informative early trials will therefore be biomarker-enriched and mechanism-rich, with prespecified criteria that distinguish target failure from delivery, dose, endotype, or safety failure.

Related

  1. Single-cell Transcriptomics in Autoimmune Diseases: Mechanistic Insights, Cross-disease Convergence, and Translational Challenges in Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Type 1 Diabetes, and Multiple Sclerosis.
    Thanh-Hong Nguyen, Tuan-Dinh Nguyen, Oanh-Thi Hoang +5
    Clinical reviews in allergy & immunologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationEurope PMC
  2. Natural Products for Rheumatoid Arthritis Therapy: Research Progress and Translational Perspectives
    Qinxuan Zhou, Zhengyang Song, Bing Xu +3
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General biochemistryCrossref
  3. Histone lactylation in fibroblast-like synoviocytes drives CXCL1-mediated immune cell recruitment in rheumatoid arthritis
    Zhidong Liu, Xiaojun Xu, Chaoqiang Chen +4
    iSciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Molecular biology & gene regulationCell biologyCell PressCrossref
  4. A pathway-guided kernel MLP architecture for interpretable cross-disease transfer from rheumatoid arthritis to hematological malignancies
    Lütviye Özge Temur, Ebru Geçici Birkan, Esra İlbahar +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationCrossref
  5. Differential Expression of Cytotoxic-Associated Markers in Circulating CD4+CD28− T Cells and NK Cells in Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Julio Sesma-Soto, Mariana Patlán, Rashidi Springall +4
    International journal of molecular sciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biochemistryEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{afandizada2026therapeutics,
  title = {{RNA therapeutics in rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and systemic sclerosis: a compartment-aware translational framework}},
  author = {Yusif Afandizada and Hikmet Memmedov and Mushfig Orujov and Shahla Eyvazova and Shirkhan Amikishiyev},
  journal = {Frontiers in Immunology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fimmu.2026.1950465},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1950465/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - RNA therapeutics in rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and systemic sclerosis: a compartment-aware translational framework
AU  - Yusif Afandizada
AU  - Hikmet Memmedov
AU  - Mushfig Orujov
AU  - Shahla Eyvazova
AU  - Shirkhan Amikishiyev
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
JO  - Frontiers in Immunology
DO  - 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1950465
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1950465/full
AB  - Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus/lupus nephritis (SLE/LN), and systemic sclerosis (SSc) remain major causes of chronic inflammation, disability, organ damage, and treatment burden despite therapeutic advances. RNA therapeutics offer programmable transcript suppression, network-level microRNA modulation, transient restoration of protective proteins, and targeting-ligand functions. Existing reviews largely catalogue modalities or individual delivery systems; this review instead asks whether a candidate forms an interpretable translational program across target biology, disease compartment, intended cell, productive intracellular access, direct target engagement, pathway pharmacodynamics, repeat-dose safety, and manufacturing feasibility. RA is primarily a synovial immune–stromal delivery problem in which RNA programs must also demonstrate an advantage over effective biologic or targeted synthetic therapies. SLE/LN offers interferon, B-cell, co-stimulatory, microRNA, messenger RNA (mRNA), and complement opportunities, but therapeutic nucleic acids and carriers must not intensify nucleic-acid sensing, interferon activity, or complement-associated injury. SSc combines strong antifibrotic RNA biology with an accessible skin proof-of-mechanism window, whereas lung, vascular, and internal-organ programs remain more delivery-limited. We separate human pathway validation, RNA-platform evidence outside the target disease, disease-specific RNA evidence, and patient efficacy. Recent human complement-factor-B pharmacodynamic data strengthen the platform-level evidence but do not establish efficacy in RA or LN. The most informative early trials will therefore be biomarker-enriched and mechanism-rich, with prespecified criteria that distinguish target failure from delivery, dose, endotype, or safety failure.
SN  - 1664-3224
ER  -