Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
178,033 studies31 sourcesUpdated 41 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-ND 4.0Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems

Limitations and alternatives to the salmonid mortality formulae for Francis turbines proposed by Tomanova et al. (2023)

Abstract

Based on data from 73 in situ mortality tests available in both peer-reviewed and grey literature, we developed in 2023 two new formulae for estimating salmonid mortality rates in Francis turbines. The first formula uses turbine peripheral speed, diameter, and fish size, while the second is based on more commonly available parameters, allowing broader applicability: turbine discharge, water head, and fish size. Application of these formulae to several existing facilities revealed some inconsistencies for certain turbine runners. Using data from 355 Francis turbines installed in France, we identified machines for which the new formulae cannot be applied. This short note complements the initial publication by Tomanova et al. (2023), characterises the problematic cases, and presents an alternative mortality formula that was initially tested but not selected because of its lower predictive power.

Related

  1. From video to encounter histories: individual identification and machine vision for salmonid capture-recapture monitoring
    K. Karlsson
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEcologybioRxiv
  2. Molecular Epidemiological Investigation of Salmonid Alphavirus Genotype 2 (SAV2) Emergence on the Helgeland Coast of Norway in 2023.
    Jan Inge Øvrebø, Hilde Sindre, Hege Løkslett +2
    VirusesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textImmunologyEurope PMC
  3. Testing Thirty Years of Hypotheses: Ancient Trout-Salmon Introgression and Limited Pre-Colonial Gene Flow Between Rainbow and Cutthroat Trout Shaped Pacific Salmonid Evolution
    E. Tolman, H. Pardue, G. Castillo +8
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textEvolutionary biologybioRxiv
  4. Salmonid science on the move: Twenty years of research through the lens of early career researchers
    A. Fontaine, L. E. Hunter, A. Lamarins +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEcologybioRxiv
  5. Optimising bat-friendly curtailment algorithms for wind turbines
    Kévin Barré, Kseniia Kravchenko, Thierry Chambert +8
    Journal of Environmental ManagementPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textEcologyEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
BibTeX
@article{tomanova2026limitations,
  title = {{Limitations and alternatives to the salmonid mortality formulae for Francis turbines proposed by Tomanova et al. (2023)}},
  author = {Sylvie Tomanova and Dominique Courret and Sylvain Richard and Pierre Sagnes},
  journal = {Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1051/kmae/2026014},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05804469v1},
  note = {CC BY-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Limitations and alternatives to the salmonid mortality formulae for Francis turbines proposed by Tomanova et al. (2023)
AU  - Sylvie Tomanova
AU  - Dominique Courret
AU  - Sylvain Richard
AU  - Pierre Sagnes
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/18
JO  - Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems
DO  - 10.1051/kmae/2026014
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05804469v1
AB  - Based on data from 73 in situ mortality tests available in both peer-reviewed and grey literature, we developed in 2023 two new formulae for estimating salmonid mortality rates in Francis turbines. The first formula uses turbine peripheral speed, diameter, and fish size, while the second is based on more commonly available parameters, allowing broader applicability: turbine discharge, water head, and fish size. Application of these formulae to several existing facilities revealed some inconsistencies for certain turbine runners. Using data from 355 Francis turbines installed in France, we identified machines for which the new formulae cannot be applied. This short note complements the initial publication by Tomanova et al. (2023), characterises the problematic cases, and presents an alternative mortality formula that was initially tested but not selected because of its lower predictive power.
SN  - 1961-9502
SN  - 1961-9502
ER  -