Cost impact of chronic care management services in a large multi-specialty practice: A pragmatic outcomes study
- 1Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
- 2Infirmary Health, Mobile, AL, United States of America.
- 3Finch & King, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Abstract
Background: Chronic Care Management (CCM) services represent an underutilized Medicare benefit with potential to reduce healthcare costs and improve care coordination for beneficiaries with multiple chronic conditions. Objective: To evaluate the real-world impact of CCM services on healthcare expenditures and patient out-of-pocket costs in a large multi-specialty outpatient practice. Design: Pragmatic retrospective cohort study comparing Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in CCM services versus eligible non-enrolled beneficiaries. Setting: Large multi-specialty outpatient clinic in Alabama with 77 physicians across more than 20 specialties. Participants: Treatment group (n = 6,093) consisted of patients continuously enrolled in CCM services between January 1, 2024 and December 31, 2024. Comparison group (n = 30,432) included eligible patients who were not enrolled in CCM services during the same period. Intervention: Structured CCM program delivered by licensed practical nurses (LPNs) providing monthly telephone or video encounters focused on care plan implementation, medication reconciliation, care coordination, preventive health maintenance, and social determinants of health. Main measures: Per-member-per-year (PMPM) paid amounts and patient out-of-pocket expenditures. Results: The CCM treatment group demonstrated 13.6% lower healthcare costs compared to the comparison group ($96 vs. $110 PMPM). Patient out-of-pocket expenses were 16% lower in the treatment group ($29 vs. $34 PMPM). These savings were achieved despite the treatment group being 2% older on average and including 10% more female beneficiaries—both factors typically associated with higher healthcare costs. Conclusions: Implementation of structured CCM services in a real-world multi-specialty practice setting is associated with reductions in both total healthcare expenditures and patient out-of-pocket costs. These findings support CCM as a practical, cost-effective approach to chronic disease management that benefits patients.
Related
- A general practice-centred model for early diagnosis and management of Alzheimer's disease in Denmark: rationale, evidence and a pragmatic diagnostic approach.
- Health-Related Services Using Digital Devices for the General Public in Pragmatic Trials: A Scoping Review
- The Impact of Distance to Specialty and Primary Care on Health Outcomes and Service Use in Adults with Down Syndrome
- Management, Practice, and Outcomes of Fragility Fractures and Osteoporosis Care at a Tertiary Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
- Comparative and synergistic effects of digital devices and Child Life services in pediatric clinical practice: a systematic review
BibTeX
@article{clark2026cost,
title = {{Cost impact of chronic care management services in a large multi-specialty practice: A pragmatic outcomes study}},
author = {Bennett W Clark and Jacob Webster and Souvik Chatterjee and Michael D Finch},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0345422},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345422},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Cost impact of chronic care management services in a large multi-specialty practice: A pragmatic outcomes study
AU - Bennett W Clark
AU - Jacob Webster
AU - Souvik Chatterjee
AU - Michael D Finch
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/30
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0345422
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345422
AB - Background: Chronic Care Management (CCM) services represent an underutilized Medicare benefit with potential to reduce healthcare costs and improve care coordination for beneficiaries with multiple chronic conditions. Objective: To evaluate the real-world impact of CCM services on healthcare expenditures and patient out-of-pocket costs in a large multi-specialty outpatient practice. Design: Pragmatic retrospective cohort study comparing Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in CCM services versus eligible non-enrolled beneficiaries. Setting: Large multi-specialty outpatient clinic in Alabama with 77 physicians across more than 20 specialties. Participants: Treatment group (n = 6,093) consisted of patients continuously enrolled in CCM services between January 1, 2024 and December 31, 2024. Comparison group (n = 30,432) included eligible patients who were not enrolled in CCM services during the same period. Intervention: Structured CCM program delivered by licensed practical nurses (LPNs) providing monthly telephone or video encounters focused on care plan implementation, medication reconciliation, care coordination, preventive health maintenance, and social determinants of health. Main measures: Per-member-per-year (PMPM) paid amounts and patient out-of-pocket expenditures. Results: The CCM treatment group demonstrated 13.6% lower healthcare costs compared to the comparison group ($96 vs. $110 PMPM). Patient out-of-pocket expenses were 16% lower in the treatment group ($29 vs. $34 PMPM). These savings were achieved despite the treatment group being 2% older on average and including 10% more female beneficiaries—both factors typically associated with higher healthcare costs. Conclusions: Implementation of structured CCM services in a real-world multi-specialty practice setting is associated with reductions in both total healthcare expenditures and patient out-of-pocket costs. These findings support CCM as a practical, cost-effective approach to chronic disease management that benefits patients.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -