Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated just now
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Testing the equivalence principle with lunar laser ranging residuals from different planetary and lunar ephemerides

Abstract

Lunar laser ranging (LLR) provides a sensitive test of the equivalence principle (EP) through a possible synodic perturbation in the Earth--Moon distance. In this work, we develop an independent LLR data-reduction framework and investigate this signature in the post-fit O--C residuals obtained with the EPM21, INPOP21, and DE430 planetary and lunar ephemerides. The same observation model and parameter-adjustment procedure are applied to the three ephemerides, allowing their residual-based results to be compared within a consistent framework. To account for the nonuniform distribution of LLR observations over the synodic angle D, the residuals are fitted with cosine and sine harmonics up to the third order. Signal-injection tests are also performed to quantify the attenuation of a possible cos D signal during the parameter adjustment. After correcting for signal attenuation, solar radiation pressure, and the thermal response of the lunar retroreflectors, the preferred EPM21, INPOP21, and DE430 solutions yield Δ(mg/mi)EM=(0.900±3.183)×10−14, (0.496±3.624)×10−14, and (2.669±7.048)×10−14, respectively. The EPM21 and INPOP21 results are based on observations from 1970 to 2024, whereas the DE430 solution was obtained using observations up to 2016. All three estimates are consistent with zero within their uncertainties. This work demonstrates that residual-based analysis can provide an independent and transparent EP test, while also offering guidance for assessing sampling and ephemeris-dependent effects in future high-precision LLR studies.

Versions

Related

  1. The Equivalence Principle in the Dark Sector in light of DESI
    Andrea Clini, Pierre Zhang, Emanuele Castorina +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCosmologyHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  2. Tests of equivalence principle violation in doubly coupled dark energy
    Yannick Kegel, Ziyang Zheng, Luca Amendola
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyarXiv
  3. Galactic warps constrain equivalence-principle violation in the dark sector
    Harry Desmond, Pedro G. Ferreira
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyGalaxiesarXiv
  4. Insights into the Micromechanical Properties of Different Planetary Bodies: Nanoindentation Studies of Martian Olivines and Pyroxenes
    Pau Grèbol-Tomàs, Jordi Ibáñez-Insa, Josep Maria Trigo-Rodríguez +3
    The Planetary Science JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPlanetary science & exoplanetsIOP/AASCrossref
  5. ExoEcho: Exoplanet Ephemerides Change Observations. III. A JWST Survey for Transit Timing Variations of 37 Exoplanets
    Yunke Wu, Zixin Zhang, Xinyue Ma +6
    The Astrophysical Journal Supplement SeriesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{ke2026testing,
  title = {{Testing the equivalence principle with lunar laser ranging residuals from different planetary and lunar ephemerides}},
  author = {Jun Ke and Jie Luo and Qin Li and Yu-Jie Tan and Cheng-Gang Shao},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.15303},
  eprint = {2609.15303},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.15303},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Testing the equivalence principle with lunar laser ranging residuals from different planetary and lunar ephemerides
AU  - Jun Ke
AU  - Jie Luo
AU  - Qin Li
AU  - Yu-Jie Tan
AU  - Cheng-Gang Shao
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/14
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.15303
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.15303
AB  - Lunar laser ranging (LLR) provides a sensitive test of the equivalence principle (EP) through a possible synodic perturbation in the Earth--Moon distance. In this work, we develop an independent LLR data-reduction framework and investigate this signature in the post-fit O--C residuals obtained with the EPM21, INPOP21, and DE430 planetary and lunar ephemerides. The same observation model and parameter-adjustment procedure are applied to the three ephemerides, allowing their residual-based results to be compared within a consistent framework. To account for the nonuniform distribution of LLR observations over the synodic angle D, the residuals are fitted with cosine and sine harmonics up to the third order. Signal-injection tests are also performed to quantify the attenuation of a possible cos D signal during the parameter adjustment. After correcting for signal attenuation, solar radiation pressure, and the thermal response of the lunar retroreflectors, the preferred EPM21, INPOP21, and DE430 solutions yield Δ(m_g/m_i)_EM=(0.900±3.183)×10^−14, (0.496±3.624)×10^−14, and (2.669±7.048)×10^−14, respectively. The EPM21 and INPOP21 results are based on observations from 1970 to 2024, whereas the DE430 solution was obtained using observations up to 2016. All three estimates are consistent with zero within their uncertainties. This work demonstrates that residual-based analysis can provide an independent and transparent EP test, while also offering guidance for assessing sampling and ephemeris-dependent effects in future high-precision LLR studies.
ER  -