Development of a quality metric to measure bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out of hospital cardiac arrest: A modified Delphi study
4 affiliations
- 1Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK; Essex & Herts Air Ambulance, Essex, UK; Corresponding author at: Essex & Herts Air Ambulance, Flight House, Earls Colne Business Centre, Earls Colne, Essex, CO6 2NS.
- 2Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK
- 3Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK; Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Essex, UK
- 4Essex & Herts Air Ambulance, Essex, UK
Abstract
Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest remains a significant global public health challenge, with survival heavily dependent on early and high-quality bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Current data collection frameworks lack standardised tools to assess the quality of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Objective: This study aimed to develop a preliminary consensus-based quality metric for use in both research and clinical practice. Setting: This study was conducted in the United Kingdom with international representation within the Delphi panel. Participants: A total of 104 participants registered, with 62, 48, and 18 completing rounds one to three, respectively in the Delphi panel. The panel consisted of Doctors, advanced practitioners, Paramedics, Nurses and academics. Methods: A modified Delphi method was employed to identify and define quality indicators. Criteria were developed from a literature review, stakeholder input, and panel consensus. A diverse expert panel, including clinicians, researchers, educators, and informed laypersons, participated in three iterative rounds (two online surveys and a final virtual consensus meeting). Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement on a 1–5 Likert scale. Results: Eleven criteria achieved consensus for inclusion, encompassing core mechanical parameters (e.g., chest compression rate, depth, recoil) and contextual factors (e.g., dispatcher instruction, time from recognition to emergency call, and automated external defibrillator use). All criteria were agreed to be scored dichotomously. Two composite indicators were created to streamline overlapping elements. Conclusion: The provisional metric reflects both established guidelines and evolving evidence on factors influencing bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation effectiveness. The inclusion of time and system-based criteria acknowledges the broader context in which cardiopulmonary resuscitation is delivered. Once validated in future studies this metric has potential for practical relevance for feedback tools, service evaluation, and research standardisation. This study was not registered.
Related
- Temporal trends in bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and favourable neurological outcome among older patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest stratified by bystander-patient relationship and age: a JCS-ReSS study.
- Prognostic Impact of Transient Return of Spontaneous Circulation According to Low-Flow Time in Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Undergoing Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Nationwide Cohort Study
- Prehospital extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a protocol for the Rapid prehospital ACcess to ECPR in Prague (RACE Prague) single-arm pilot feasibility study
- Transport mechanical ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an exploratory prehospital pilot study
- Healthcare providers’ confidence, satisfaction, and perceived preparedness following a multicomponent simulation-based cardiopulmonary resuscitation training program in Gaza
BibTeX
@article{mcpherson2026development,
title = {{Development of a quality metric to measure bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out of hospital cardiac arrest: A modified Delphi study}},
author = {Melinda (Dolly) McPherson and Sarah McLachlan and Hilary Bungay and Thomas R Keeble and Gareth Grier and Adam Carr},
journal = {International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/j.ijnsa.2026.100714},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2026.100714},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Development of a quality metric to measure bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out of hospital cardiac arrest: A modified Delphi study
AU - Melinda (Dolly) McPherson
AU - Sarah McLachlan
AU - Hilary Bungay
AU - Thomas R Keeble
AU - Gareth Grier
AU - Adam Carr
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/17
JO - International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances
DO - 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2026.100714
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2026.100714
AB - Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest remains a significant global public health challenge, with survival heavily dependent on early and high-quality bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Current data collection frameworks lack standardised tools to assess the quality of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Objective: This study aimed to develop a preliminary consensus-based quality metric for use in both research and clinical practice. Setting: This study was conducted in the United Kingdom with international representation within the Delphi panel. Participants: A total of 104 participants registered, with 62, 48, and 18 completing rounds one to three, respectively in the Delphi panel. The panel consisted of Doctors, advanced practitioners, Paramedics, Nurses and academics. Methods: A modified Delphi method was employed to identify and define quality indicators. Criteria were developed from a literature review, stakeholder input, and panel consensus. A diverse expert panel, including clinicians, researchers, educators, and informed laypersons, participated in three iterative rounds (two online surveys and a final virtual consensus meeting). Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement on a 1–5 Likert scale. Results: Eleven criteria achieved consensus for inclusion, encompassing core mechanical parameters (e.g., chest compression rate, depth, recoil) and contextual factors (e.g., dispatcher instruction, time from recognition to emergency call, and automated external defibrillator use). All criteria were agreed to be scored dichotomously. Two composite indicators were created to streamline overlapping elements. Conclusion: The provisional metric reflects both established guidelines and evolving evidence on factors influencing bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation effectiveness. The inclusion of time and system-based criteria acknowledges the broader context in which cardiopulmonary resuscitation is delivered. Once validated in future studies this metric has potential for practical relevance for feedback tools, service evaluation, and research standardisation. This study was not registered.
SN - 2666-142X
ER -