Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
PreprintCC BYChemRxiv

Consistency Testing of an Integrated SWRO–Brine Valorization Architecture: Alkalinity as the Binding Constraint

  1. 1Independent Researcher

Abstract

Integrated seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) with brine valorization is widely proposed as a route to lower energy and near-zero liquid discharge, but such architectures are rarely tested against the physical bounds their stages must obey. Here a consistency-testing framework is applied to an architecture combining subsurface intake, isobaric energy recovery, membrane brine concentration, selective Ca/Mg precipitation and mechanical-vapor-compression crystallization. Each subsystem is checked against a thermodynamic or stoichiometric constraint rather than an assumed value. The concentrator duty commonly assumed in this class of study, 0.5–1.0 kWh m−3 of brine, lies at or below the least work of separation for that feed, 0.94 kWh m−3. A bounded estimate from that minimum and a 25–55% second-law efficiency gives 1.7–3.8 kWh m−3, raising the modeled total specific energy consumption to a median of 13.1 kWh m−3. Magnesium recovery is limited by alkalinity rather than by magnesium. The base required carries 10.0 kg CO2 per cubic meter of permeate in embodied carbon, roughly double the plant's grid emissions, or 27 kWh m−3 if generated electrochemically. Lime dosing releases 5.3 times more calcium than the carbonate step removes, so the train does not close. Costing those reagents explicitly is decisive: at $1.70 m−3 they exceed the $1.25 m−3 mineral credit, and Monte Carlo propagation (300,000 samples) gives a net levelized cost of $2.20 m−3 against $0.76 m−3 for conventional SWRO. Closing the calcium balance costs $0.44 m−3; above $0.069 kWh−1 no on-site base can close the loop, because the reversible limit of water dissociation binds.

Related

  1. Integrated valorization of rice-stubble and waste cooking oil for rhamnolipid production with process optimization, techno-economic and life-cycle assessment
    Sourab Paul, Jayato Nayak, Anvitha Gangireddy +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionCrossref
  2. BALANITES AEGYPTIACA (L.) DELILE IN THE SAHELIAN ARID ZONES: AN INTEGRATED SYNTHESIS OF ITS ECOLOGY, ETHNOBOTANY, PHYTOCHEMISTRY, PHARMACOLOGY AND SUSTAINABLE VALORIZATION POTENTIAL
    Moustapha Bassimbé Sagna, Alimatou Sam, Khoudia Niang +3
    GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  3. Response of the Carbonate System to Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement: A Mesocosm-Scale Experiment
    Selene Varliero, Piero Macchi, Daniela Basso +7
    ACS ES&T waterPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionEurope PMC
  4. Overlooked contribution of organic alkalinity in Arctic Ocean margins biases ocean acidification estimates
    Shuzhen Song, Richard Bellerby, Philip Wallhead +7
    Communications Earth & EnvironmentPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textOceanography & cryosphereCrossref
  5. Lethal by Design? Resolving Differences Between Experimental and Real‐World Alkalinity Perturbations in Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement
    Lennart T. Bach, Michael Dominik Tyka, Bin Wang +1
    Journal of Geophysical Research OceansPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC6 citedOceanography & cryosphereOpenAlex
BibTeX
@misc{sandler2026consistency,
  title = {{Consistency Testing of an Integrated SWRO–Brine Valorization Architecture: Alkalinity as the Binding Constraint}},
  author = {Leon Sandler},
  howpublished = {ChemRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.26434/chemrxiv.15011006/v1},
  url = {https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15011006/v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Consistency Testing of an Integrated SWRO–Brine Valorization Architecture: Alkalinity as the Binding Constraint
AU  - Leon Sandler
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/25
PB  - ChemRxiv
DO  - 10.26434/chemrxiv.15011006/v1
UR  - https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15011006/v1
AB  - Integrated seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) with brine valorization is widely proposed as a route to lower energy and near-zero liquid discharge, but such architectures are rarely tested against the physical bounds their stages must obey. Here a consistency-testing framework is applied to an architecture combining subsurface intake, isobaric energy recovery, membrane brine concentration, selective Ca/Mg precipitation and mechanical-vapor-compression crystallization. Each subsystem is checked against a thermodynamic or stoichiometric constraint rather than an assumed value. The concentrator duty commonly assumed in this class of study, 0.5–1.0 kWh m−3 of brine, lies at or below the least work of separation for that feed, 0.94 kWh m−3. A bounded estimate from that minimum and a 25–55% second-law efficiency gives 1.7–3.8 kWh m−3, raising the modeled total specific energy consumption to a median of 13.1 kWh m−3. Magnesium recovery is limited by alkalinity rather than by magnesium. The base required carries 10.0 kg CO2 per cubic meter of permeate in embodied carbon, roughly double the plant's grid emissions, or 27 kWh m−3 if generated electrochemically. Lime dosing releases 5.3 times more calcium than the carbonate step removes, so the train does not close. Costing those reagents explicitly is decisive: at $1.70 m−3 they exceed the $1.25 m−3 mineral credit, and Monte Carlo propagation (300,000 samples) gives a net levelized cost of $2.20 m−3 against $0.76 m−3 for conventional SWRO. Closing the calcium balance costs $0.44 m−3; above $0.069 kWh−1 no on-site base can close the loop, because the reversible limit of water dissociation binds.
ER  -