Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 8 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Evaluation of HPV E6/E7 mRNA in predicting recurrence after Leep in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A study of negative findings

  1. 1Gynecology Department, The First People’s Hospital of Nanning, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
  2. 2Pathology Department, The First People’s Hospital of Nanning, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
  3. 3Gynecology Department, The Reproductive Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China

Abstract

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is a precursor to cervical cancer, and early detection of residual or recurrent disease is therefore critical for effective management. This study evaluated whether HPV E6/E7 mRNA status predicts recurrence in patients with CIN who underwent loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). People’s Hospital of Nanning between January 2019 and July 2022 were included. Patients who underwent LEEP for high-grade cervical lesions at the First Follow-up commenced 4–6 months after LEEP and continued for 24 months; abnormal findings during this period prompted referral for colposcopy or cervical biopsy. Of the 91 patients, 3 (3.30%) experienced recurrence within 24 months. Recurrence rates were similar between patients with preoperative E6/E7 mRNA positivity (3.23%) and negativity (3.45%) (p = 0.956), and between postoperative E6/E7 mRNA status groups (5.26% in the negative group vs. 0% in the positive group; p = 0.814). Although 66.7% of patients shifted from positive to negative E6/E7 mRNA status after LEEP (p < 0.001), this change was not associated with recurrence risk. Preoperative E6/E7 mRNA yielded a sensitivity of 66.67% and specificity of 31.82%, whereas postoperative E6/E7 mRNA showed a sensitivity of 0% and specificity of 97.30%. In conclusion, E6/E7 mRNA status before and after LEEP did not predict recurrence in patients with CIN. Despite a significant reduction in E6/E7 mRNA positivity after surgery, its low sensitivity underscores the need for more effective biomarkers in follow-up care.

Related

  1. Methyl aminolevulinate-PpIX mediated fluorescence-guided mapping of high-grade vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: a pilot prospective clinical trial (PhotoDiVin).
    Lorraine Hejl, Marion Helle, Léa Leufflen +10
    Lasers in medical sciencePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral biologyOncologyEurope PMCPMCHAL
  2. Impact of menopausal status on human papillomavirus detection and cervical neoplasia in middle-aged Senegalese women
    Emily R. Spencer, Rachel L. Winer, Selly Ba +7
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMicrobiologyInfectious diseasePLOS
  3. Comparative evaluation of metabolomic, microbial, and integrated features for distinguishing a rat model of heatstroke death from cervical-dislocation controls and estimating postmortem interval across organs
    Jianghuan Lu, Zhiao Duan, Siqi Chen +7
    Frontiers in microbiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMicrobiologyEurope PMC
  4. Multicentre medicoeconomic evaluation of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for predicting coronary artery disease in left ventricular dysfunction: The CAMAREC study design
    Louis-Marie Desroche, Damien Mandry, Gregory Ducrocq +14
    Archives of cardiovascular diseasesPeer-reviewedLicence not stated3 citedGeneral biologyCardiovascular medicineHAL
  5. Efficacy evaluation of the cervical posterior “keyhole technique” in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: A retrospective case series
    Ruohui Tang, Jin Yin, Zhixiang Zhang +3
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceMedical imaging & radiologyPLOSPMC
BibTeX
@article{huang2026evaluation,
  title = {{Evaluation of HPV E6/E7 mRNA in predicting recurrence after Leep in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A study of negative findings}},
  author = {Yingmei Huang and Jianyong Huang and Hongmian Jiang and Yumei Wei and Zhong Lin and Baoli Xie},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0360914},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360914},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Evaluation of HPV E6/E7 mRNA in predicting recurrence after Leep in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A study of negative findings
AU  - Yingmei Huang
AU  - Jianyong Huang
AU  - Hongmian Jiang
AU  - Yumei Wei
AU  - Zhong Lin
AU  - Baoli Xie
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/16
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0360914
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360914
AB  - Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is a precursor to cervical cancer, and early detection of residual or recurrent disease is therefore critical for effective management. This study evaluated whether HPV E6/E7 mRNA status predicts recurrence in patients with CIN who underwent loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). People’s Hospital of Nanning between January 2019 and July 2022 were included. Patients who underwent LEEP for high-grade cervical lesions at the First Follow-up commenced 4–6 months after LEEP and continued for 24 months; abnormal findings during this period prompted referral for colposcopy or cervical biopsy. Of the 91 patients, 3 (3.30%) experienced recurrence within 24 months. Recurrence rates were similar between patients with preoperative E6/E7 mRNA positivity (3.23%) and negativity (3.45%) (p = 0.956), and between postoperative E6/E7 mRNA status groups (5.26% in the negative group vs. 0% in the positive group; p = 0.814). Although 66.7% of patients shifted from positive to negative E6/E7 mRNA status after LEEP (p < 0.001), this change was not associated with recurrence risk. Preoperative E6/E7 mRNA yielded a sensitivity of 66.67% and specificity of 31.82%, whereas postoperative E6/E7 mRNA showed a sensitivity of 0% and specificity of 97.30%. In conclusion, E6/E7 mRNA status before and after LEEP did not predict recurrence in patients with CIN. Despite a significant reduction in E6/E7 mRNA positivity after surgery, its low sensitivity underscores the need for more effective biomarkers in follow-up care.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -