Clinicians’ Perspectives on the Use of Robotic Dogs in Therapy for Child Sexual Abuse
- 1The Cairnmillar Institute, Hawthorn East (Wurundjeri Country), Melbourne, VIC 3123 Australia
- 2School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, (Dja Dja Wurrung and Taungurung Country), Bendigo, VIC 3552 Australia
- 3Bravehearts Foundation, Arundel (Yugambeh Country), Arundel, QLD 4214 Australia
Abstract
Dog-assisted therapy is associated with improved treatment outcomes for children who have experienced trauma, including child sexual abuse (CSA). However, there are limitations to employing live dogs in therapy (e.g., cost, welfare concerns). Research suggests that robotic dogs may be a viable alternative; however, no published accounts have explored the use of robotic dogs in therapy for CSA survivors. This research aimed to qualitatively explore clinicians’ perspectives on the use of robotic dogs in therapy sessions with CSA survivors, in terms of potential effectiveness, benefits, and limitations. Four clinicians from an organisation that provides treatment to CSA survivors used a robotic dog in their treatment-as-usual sessions with CSA survivors aged between 5—12 years and were then interviewed about their experiences. Thematic qualitative analysis of clinician interviews revealed four main themes: (1) client characteristics that influenced their interest in the robotic dog (e.g., age, shyness); (2) clients’ behavioural interactions with the dog (e.g., cuddling, kicking); (3) robotic dog characteristics (e.g., softness, interactivity, and distractibility); and (4) clinicians’ use of the robotic dog (e.g., for psychoeducation, rapport development). The main reported benefits of the robotic dog were: it was a comfort object for clients, it was useful for psychoeducation, and it helped facilitated the development of therapeutic alliances between clinicians and CSA survivors. Shortcomings included distractibility (e.g., unwanted barking) and lack of technological advancement. Our findings provide preliminary evidence that there are advantages to using robotic dogs in therapy for CSA survivors.
Related
- Dissociating Resting-State Networks of Pedohebephilic Preference and Child Sexual Offending Using Network-Based Prediction
- Optimization of antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients, what clinicians and searchers must know
- Current translational perspectives for diagnosis and individualized therapy in rare genetic diseases
- Unraveling the use of vaccine therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer: a comprehensive review of current state and future perspectives
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Thoracic Surgery: Self-Reported Practice Among a Survey of European Clinicians
BibTeX
@article{reyneke2026clinicians,
title = {{Clinicians’ Perspectives on the Use of Robotic Dogs in Therapy for Child Sexual Abuse}},
author = {Tamsyn B. Reyneke and Tiffani J. Howell and Rebekah L. Chapman and Carol A. Ronken and David Butler},
journal = {Journal of Child \& Adolescent Trauma},
year = {2026},
month = may,
doi = {10.1007/s40653-026-00907-1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-026-00907-1},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Clinicians’ Perspectives on the Use of Robotic Dogs in Therapy for Child Sexual Abuse
AU - Tamsyn B. Reyneke
AU - Tiffani J. Howell
AU - Rebekah L. Chapman
AU - Carol A. Ronken
AU - David Butler
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/05/22
JO - Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma
DO - 10.1007/s40653-026-00907-1
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-026-00907-1
AB - Dog-assisted therapy is associated with improved treatment outcomes for children who have experienced trauma, including child sexual abuse (CSA). However, there are limitations to employing live dogs in therapy (e.g., cost, welfare concerns). Research suggests that robotic dogs may be a viable alternative; however, no published accounts have explored the use of robotic dogs in therapy for CSA survivors. This research aimed to qualitatively explore clinicians’ perspectives on the use of robotic dogs in therapy sessions with CSA survivors, in terms of potential effectiveness, benefits, and limitations. Four clinicians from an organisation that provides treatment to CSA survivors used a robotic dog in their treatment-as-usual sessions with CSA survivors aged between 5—12 years and were then interviewed about their experiences. Thematic qualitative analysis of clinician interviews revealed four main themes: (1) client characteristics that influenced their interest in the robotic dog (e.g., age, shyness); (2) clients’ behavioural interactions with the dog (e.g., cuddling, kicking); (3) robotic dog characteristics (e.g., softness, interactivity, and distractibility); and (4) clinicians’ use of the robotic dog (e.g., for psychoeducation, rapport development). The main reported benefits of the robotic dog were: it was a comfort object for clients, it was useful for psychoeducation, and it helped facilitated the development of therapeutic alliances between clinicians and CSA survivors. Shortcomings included distractibility (e.g., unwanted barking) and lack of technological advancement. Our findings provide preliminary evidence that there are advantages to using robotic dogs in therapy for CSA survivors.
SN - 1936-1521
SN - 1936-153X
ER -