Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 6 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation

Pelvic Obliquity Impacts Acetabular Coverage Measurements, and the Elevated Hip Is More Frequently Symptomatic in Hip Preservation Patients

  1. 1Department of Orthopaedics University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah U.S.A.

Abstract

Purpose

To quantify the impact of femoral head height discrepancies on pelvic-based versus ground-based measurements for lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) and Tönnis angle and to determine whether these discrepancies affected the clinical presentation of patients who presented to a hip preservation clinic.Methods

Consecutive patients who underwent a primary hip arthroscopy between May 2021 and August 2021 and consecutive patients who underwent a primary periacetabular osteotomy between January 2020 and December 2023 with available preoperative standing anteroposterior radiographs were included. Patients were excluded if they (1) had undergone a previous surgery in either hip prior to the primary operation or (2) were less than 18 years of age at the time of surgery. The LCEA to the sourcil edge, LCEA to the bone edge, and Tönnis angle were calculated, referencing off (1) the pelvis and (2) the horizontal to the ground. Differences between measurements were calculated in degrees, and differences in femoral head heights to approximate pelvic obliquity were calculated in millimeters. Comparisons were made via regression analysis.Results

Fifty hip arthroscopy patients and 75 periacetabular osteotomy patients were included. Regression analysis showed that LCEA to the sourcil edge was impacted by the difference in femoral head height when comparing the pelvic-based measurement with the ground-based measurement (B = 0.298; R ² = 0.775; 95% confidence interval = 0.274-0.322; P < .001). Furthermore, in patients with a femoral head height difference of 10 mm or more, 100% (8/8) of patients who underwent a periacetabular osteotomy and 75% (6/8) of patients who underwent a hip arthroscopy reported more symptoms on the more elevated hip.Conclusions

Differences in femoral head height on standing anteroposterior radiographs impact ground- versus pelvic-based radiographic measurements of acetabular coverage by approximately 0.3° per millimeter of femoral head height difference and may result in functional undercoverage of the elevated hip.Level of evidence

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Related

  1. Evaluating large language models in patient education: a comparative analysis addressing frequently asked questions in peri-acetabular osteotomy
    TP Davis, B Guevel, K Logishetty +2
    Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of EnglandPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedEpidemiology & public healthPMC
  2. Reverse Obliquity Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Technique Guide for Using a Blocking Screw to Enhance Fixation
    Nathan Forren, Daniel Sabo, Brent Whitehead +4
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMC
  3. The Circulation Journal Official Impact Factor and the Most Frequently Cited Papers in 2025
    Kenichi Tsujita
    Circulation JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textCardiovascular medicineJ-STAGE
  4. Thyroid-cartilage and anterior-laryngeal electrodes provide higher and more frequently adequate electromyographic signals in intraoperative neuromonitoring during thyroid surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hisham Ali Alghamdi, Muhannad Ali Hendi Alghamdi, Mujtaba A. Ali +10
    Gland SurgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Bilateral acetabular fractures after a generalized tonic–clonic seizure without trauma
    Hideto Yoshida, Kazumasa Nakada
    CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMC
BibTeX
@article{johnson2026pelvic,
  title = {{Pelvic Obliquity Impacts Acetabular Coverage Measurements, and the Elevated Hip Is More Frequently Symptomatic in Hip Preservation Patients}},
  author = {Benjamin T Johnson and Daniel C Lewis and Allan K Metz and Ashley L Matter and Christopher L Peters and Lucas A Anderson and Stephen K Aoki},
  journal = {Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1002/ars2.70129},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13718872},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Pelvic Obliquity Impacts Acetabular Coverage Measurements, and the Elevated Hip Is More Frequently Symptomatic in Hip Preservation Patients
AU  - Benjamin T Johnson
AU  - Daniel C Lewis
AU  - Allan K Metz
AU  - Ashley L Matter
AU  - Christopher L Peters
AU  - Lucas A Anderson
AU  - Stephen K Aoki
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
JO  - Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation
DO  - 10.1002/ars2.70129
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13718872
AB  - Purpose  To quantify the impact of femoral head height discrepancies on pelvic-based versus ground-based measurements for lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) and Tönnis angle and to determine whether these discrepancies affected the clinical presentation of patients who presented to a hip preservation clinic.Methods  Consecutive patients who underwent a primary hip arthroscopy between May 2021 and August 2021 and consecutive patients who underwent a primary periacetabular osteotomy between January 2020 and December 2023 with available preoperative standing anteroposterior radiographs were included. Patients were excluded if they (1) had undergone a previous surgery in either hip prior to the primary operation or (2) were less than 18 years of age at the time of surgery. The LCEA to the sourcil edge, LCEA to the bone edge, and Tönnis angle were calculated, referencing off (1) the pelvis and (2) the horizontal to the ground. Differences between measurements were calculated in degrees, and differences in femoral head heights to approximate pelvic obliquity were calculated in millimeters. Comparisons were made via regression analysis.Results  Fifty hip arthroscopy patients and 75 periacetabular osteotomy patients were included. Regression analysis showed that LCEA to the sourcil edge was impacted by the difference in femoral head height when comparing the pelvic-based measurement with the ground-based measurement (B = 0.298; R ² = 0.775; 95% confidence interval = 0.274-0.322; P < .001). Furthermore, in patients with a femoral head height difference of 10 mm or more, 100% (8/8) of patients who underwent a periacetabular osteotomy and 75% (6/8) of patients who underwent a hip arthroscopy reported more symptoms on the more elevated hip.Conclusions  Differences in femoral head height on standing anteroposterior radiographs impact ground- versus pelvic-based radiographic measurements of acetabular coverage by approximately 0.3° per millimeter of femoral head height difference and may result in functional undercoverage of the elevated hip.Level of evidence  Level IV, retrospective case series.
SN  - 2666-061X
ER  -