Exploratory assessment of the clinical significance of the collateral system between the superior mesenteric artery and inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery
- 1Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province 230022 China
- 2Department of Anorectal Surgery, Fuyang City People’s Hospital, Fuyang, Anhui Province 236000 China
Abstract
Background: Rectal cancer (RC) is a common and lethal malignant tumor, and surgical treatment is essential. The collateral system between the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) remains controversial, and its potential clinical significance in RC has not been fully clarified. This study aimed to preliminarily explore and classify this collateral system and its clinical roles in laparoscopic RC surgery.
Methods: This single-center retrospective study enrolled patients who underwent laparoscopic radical resection for RC at Fuyang City People’s Hospital from January 2022 to March 2026. Based on arterial-phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images, three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions of the SMA, IMA, and splenic flexure inter-mesenteric anastomosis (SF-ImA) were performed using 3D Slicer. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL). Subgroup analysis was further performed to evaluate the potential clinical value of SF-ImA in laparoscopic RC surgery.
Results: SF-ImA was detected in 60.10% of RC patients, including 13.94% with central mesocolic anastomosis and 46.15% with intermediate mesocolic anastomosis. The tumor location (low vs. high, OR: 13.377; 95% CI: 2.262–259.500, P = 0.018), N stage (OR: 1.339; 95% CI: 1.095–14.183, P = 0.038), and surgical duration (OR: 1.026; 95% CI: 1.013–1.042, P = 0.001) were independent risk factors for AL. Preserving left colic artery (LCA) (OR: 0.206; 95% CI: 0.062–0.611, P = 0.006) was an independent protective factor. Subgroup analysis confirmed that LCA preservation exerted a protective effect against AL exclusively in patients without SF-ImA (OR: 0.041, 95% CI: 0.002–0.357, P = 0.012). For patients with SF-ImA, LCA preservation may fail to confer a protective effect against AL and was associated with longer operative duration (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: SF-ImA can be effectively evaluated and classified via contrast-enhanced CT combined with 3D reconstruction. Preoperative assessment of SF-ImA may assist individualized surgical planning for RC patients.
Related
- Incomplete Uterine Artery Embolization Secondary to Collateral Parasitization from Celiac and Superior Mesenteric Arterial Branches: A Case Report and Literature Review.
- Laparoscopic Roux‐en‐Y Duodenojejunostomy for a Patient With Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome Admitted to the Emergency Department
- [Comment] Ligation site of the inferior mesenteric vein in laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer: a study protocol for a multicenter randomized-controlled trial
- Transcriptomic Assessment of PD-L1 (CD274) in NSCLC: Biological Significance, Clinical Relevance, and Methodological Challenges
- Endoscopic and Symptomatic Outcomes of Vonoprazan for Erosive Esophagitis Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: An Exploratory Prospective Study
BibTeX
@article{zhao2026exploratory,
title = {{Exploratory assessment of the clinical significance of the collateral system between the superior mesenteric artery and inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery}},
author = {Zong-Xian Zhao and Run-Dong Yao and Zong-Ju Hu and Yuan Yao and Shu Zhu and Yong-Xiang Li},
journal = {BMC Gastroenterology},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1186/s12876-026-05199-1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-026-05199-1},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Exploratory assessment of the clinical significance of the collateral system between the superior mesenteric artery and inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery
AU - Zong-Xian Zhao
AU - Run-Dong Yao
AU - Zong-Ju Hu
AU - Yuan Yao
AU - Shu Zhu
AU - Yong-Xiang Li
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/01
JO - BMC Gastroenterology
DO - 10.1186/s12876-026-05199-1
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-026-05199-1
AB - Background: Rectal cancer (RC) is a common and lethal malignant tumor, and surgical treatment is essential. The collateral system between the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) remains controversial, and its potential clinical significance in RC has not been fully clarified. This study aimed to preliminarily explore and classify this collateral system and its clinical roles in laparoscopic RC surgery. Methods: This single-center retrospective study enrolled patients who underwent laparoscopic radical resection for RC at Fuyang City People’s Hospital from January 2022 to March 2026. Based on arterial-phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images, three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions of the SMA, IMA, and splenic flexure inter-mesenteric anastomosis (SF-ImA) were performed using 3D Slicer. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL). Subgroup analysis was further performed to evaluate the potential clinical value of SF-ImA in laparoscopic RC surgery. Results: SF-ImA was detected in 60.10% of RC patients, including 13.94% with central mesocolic anastomosis and 46.15% with intermediate mesocolic anastomosis. The tumor location (low vs. high, OR: 13.377; 95% CI: 2.262–259.500, P = 0.018), N stage (OR: 1.339; 95% CI: 1.095–14.183, P = 0.038), and surgical duration (OR: 1.026; 95% CI: 1.013–1.042, P = 0.001) were independent risk factors for AL. Preserving left colic artery (LCA) (OR: 0.206; 95% CI: 0.062–0.611, P = 0.006) was an independent protective factor. Subgroup analysis confirmed that LCA preservation exerted a protective effect against AL exclusively in patients without SF-ImA (OR: 0.041, 95% CI: 0.002–0.357, P = 0.012). For patients with SF-ImA, LCA preservation may fail to confer a protective effect against AL and was associated with longer operative duration (P < 0.05). Conclusion: SF-ImA can be effectively evaluated and classified via contrast-enhanced CT combined with 3D reconstruction. Preoperative assessment of SF-ImA may assist individualized surgical planning for RC patients.
SN - 1471-230X
ER -