Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 2 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Journal of Translational Medicine

Ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy better preserves B- and T-cell immunity than conventional fractionated radiotherapy in prostate cancer

4 more authors
7 affiliations
  1. 1Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
  2. 2Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
  3. 3Clinical Pathology and Cancer Biobank, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
  4. 4Biostatistical Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
  5. 5Microbiology and Diagnostic Immunology Unit, IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Rome, Italy
  6. 6Transfusion Medicine, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
  7. 7Pathology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy

Abstract

Background: Ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy (UHRT) has emerged as an effective treatment option for localized prostate cancer (PCa), but the systemic immunological consequences of different radiotherapy (RT) regimens remain largely overlooked. In particular, the relative contribution of fractionation schedule and irradiation volume to long-term immune remodelling has not been systematically investigated.

Methods: We conducted a longitudinal immune-monitoring study in peripheral blood from PCa patients treated with five different RT schedules, including three UHRT regimens. Complete blood counts and multiparametric flow cytometry were performed before treatment and longitudinally up to 12 months after RT completion to assess lymphocyte counts, immune-cell composition, and differentiation status of T- and B-cell compartments. B-cell functionality was evaluated by flow-cytometric analysis following CpG stimulation. In a subset of patients, tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) were investigated in prostate tissue by immunohistochemistry using anti-CD20 and anti-CD3 antibodies, together with CD21 and CD23 staining to assess TLS maturation.

Results: Conventional fractionated RT was associated with persistent lymphopenia, increased neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, reduction of CD3⁺ and conventional CD4⁺ T cells, enrichment of activated regulatory T-cell subsets, and prolonged depletion of memory B cells. Functional analyses demonstrated a marked impairment of B-cell responsiveness following conventional RT, whereas patients treated with UHRT maintained substantially preserved B-cell function after CpG stimulation. In contrast to conventional RT, UHRT-based regimens induced limited and largely reversible immune alterations, with progressive restoration of both T- and B-cell compartments and recovery of B-cell functionality. Importantly, peripheral immune profiles returned close to baseline values approximately one year after treatment completion, even in patients receiving pelvic irradiation. Comparison between pelvic conventional RT and pelvic UHRT further suggested that cumulative radiation exposure contributes to systemic immune disruption beyond the effect of irradiation volume alone.

Conclusions: Different RT schedules exert distinct effects on long-term systemic immune proficiency. Compared with conventional fractionated RT, UHRT preserves immune-cell homeostasis, maintains B-cell functional competence, and supports recovery of peripheral immune compartments within one year after treatment. These findings provide a strong rationale for optimizing RT fractionation strategies and for the future integration of UHRT with immunotherapeutic approaches in prostate cancer.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04774133, registered February 23 2021, retrospectively registered; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04774133

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-026-08773-z.

Related

  1. Clinical Outcomes and Safety of Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy for Malignant Tumors: A Systematic Review and Evidence Map
    Nandan M Shanbhag, Abdulrahman Bin Sumaida, Khalid S Balaraj
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Spatially fractionated (GRID) radiotherapy in a patient with metastatic pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma: a case report
    Jessica Zhang, Fahad Faruqi, Yuri Velichko +5
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0OncologyFrontiersCrossref
  3. Spatially fractionated radiotherapy with PD-L1 blockade achieves superior antitumor efficacy and safety in a preclinical model of peritoneal metastasis
    Sung Eun Lee, Changhoon Choi, Yeeun Kim +4
    Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy : CIIPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyPMC
  4. Clinical outcomes and toxicity after proton- versus photon-based spatially fractionated radiotherapy for soft-tissue sarcoma: a retrospective cohort
    Adeniyi A. Olabumuyi, Matthew H. Brown, Soha Bazyar +6
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossref
  5. Impact of a Reminder App on Bladder Filling During Moderately Hypo-Fractionated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Results of the REFILL-PAC-HYPO Trial
    Dirk Rades, Stefan Janssen, Laura Doehring +9
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General medicineCrossref
BibTeX
@article{rosado2026ultrahypofractionated,
  title = {{Ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy better preserves B- and T-cell immunity than conventional fractionated radiotherapy in prostate cancer}},
  author = {Maria Manuela Rosado and Belinda Palermo and Marta Bottero and Serena Masi and Miriam Petrella and Giulia Campo and Isabella Sperduti and Vittoria Balzano and Adriana Faiella and Claudia Capponi and Cristina Russo and Maria Laura Foddai and Andrea Russo and Iole Cordone and Giuseppe Sanguineti and Paola Nisticò},
  journal = {Journal of Translational Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1186/s12967-026-08773-z},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-026-08773-z},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy better preserves B- and T-cell immunity than conventional fractionated radiotherapy in prostate cancer
AU  - Maria Manuela Rosado
AU  - Belinda Palermo
AU  - Marta Bottero
AU  - Serena Masi
AU  - Miriam Petrella
AU  - Giulia Campo
AU  - Isabella Sperduti
AU  - Vittoria Balzano
AU  - Adriana Faiella
AU  - Claudia Capponi
AU  - Cristina Russo
AU  - Maria Laura Foddai
AU  - Andrea Russo
AU  - Iole Cordone
AU  - Giuseppe Sanguineti
AU  - Paola Nisticò
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/17
JO  - Journal of Translational Medicine
DO  - 10.1186/s12967-026-08773-z
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-026-08773-z
AB  - Background: Ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy (UHRT) has emerged as an effective treatment option for localized prostate cancer (PCa), but the systemic immunological consequences of different radiotherapy (RT) regimens remain largely overlooked. In particular, the relative contribution of fractionation schedule and irradiation volume to long-term immune remodelling has not been systematically investigated.  Methods: We conducted a longitudinal immune-monitoring study in peripheral blood from PCa patients treated with five different RT schedules, including three UHRT regimens. Complete blood counts and multiparametric flow cytometry were performed before treatment and longitudinally up to 12 months after RT completion to assess lymphocyte counts, immune-cell composition, and differentiation status of T- and B-cell compartments. B-cell functionality was evaluated by flow-cytometric analysis following CpG stimulation. In a subset of patients, tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) were investigated in prostate tissue by immunohistochemistry using anti-CD20 and anti-CD3 antibodies, together with CD21 and CD23 staining to assess TLS maturation.  Results: Conventional fractionated RT was associated with persistent lymphopenia, increased neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, reduction of CD3⁺ and conventional CD4⁺ T cells, enrichment of activated regulatory T-cell subsets, and prolonged depletion of memory B cells. Functional analyses demonstrated a marked impairment of B-cell responsiveness following conventional RT, whereas patients treated with UHRT maintained substantially preserved B-cell function after CpG stimulation. In contrast to conventional RT, UHRT-based regimens induced limited and largely reversible immune alterations, with progressive restoration of both T- and B-cell compartments and recovery of B-cell functionality. Importantly, peripheral immune profiles returned close to baseline values approximately one year after treatment completion, even in patients receiving pelvic irradiation. Comparison between pelvic conventional RT and pelvic UHRT further suggested that cumulative radiation exposure contributes to systemic immune disruption beyond the effect of irradiation volume alone.  Conclusions: Different RT schedules exert distinct effects on long-term systemic immune proficiency. Compared with conventional fractionated RT, UHRT preserves immune-cell homeostasis, maintains B-cell functional competence, and supports recovery of peripheral immune compartments within one year after treatment. These findings provide a strong rationale for optimizing RT fractionation strategies and for the future integration of UHRT with immunotherapeutic approaches in prostate cancer.  Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04774133, registered February 23 2021, retrospectively registered; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04774133  Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-026-08773-z.
SN  - 1479-5876
ER  -