Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
209,918 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDExperimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Elevated human epididymis protein 4 levels in chronic kidney disease compromise the accuracy of the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm

  1. 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Gangwon 25440, Republic of Korea
  2. 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea

Abstract

The present study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) for differentiating ovarian tumors in patients with and without chronic kidney disease (CKD), using postoperative histopathological findings as the reference standard among patients who underwent surgery after ROMA testing. The retrospective study included 1,122 patients, including 21 with CKD, who met the inclusion criteria and underwent surgery for ovarian tumors at Gangneung Asan Hospital between August 2015 and August 2025. In patients with CKD, human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) levels were elevated in both benign and malignant groups compared with normal levels, with progressively higher levels observed with increasing CKD severity. Among patients with benign ovarian tumors, median HE4 levels were higher in those with CKD than in those without CKD (210.00 vs. 41.10 pmol/l). Cancer antigen 125 (CA125) levels did not differ significantly according to CKD status. Because of the elevated HE4 levels, ROMA scores were significantly higher in patients with CKD, resulting in low specificity {0.200 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.066-0.470]} and reduced overall accuracy [0.429 (95% CI, 0.240-0.640)]. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated superior predictive performance of ROMA in patients without CKD [area under the curve (AUC), 0.724; 95% CI, 0.680-0.768] compared with those with CKD (AUC, 0.467; 95% CI, 0.217-0.717). In conclusion, in patients with CKD and ovarian tumors, ROMA should be interpreted with caution, and CA125 and imaging findings should be considered alongside other clinical information when assessing the risk of ovarian malignancy.

Related

  1. A modified ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system ultrasound for differentiating ovarian carcinoma: integration of the risk of malignancy algorithm into the American College of Radiology’s O-RADS US framework
    Mengze Liu, Dandan Li, Zhanqiang Jin
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsCrossrefEurope PMCPMCEurope PMC
  2. Diagnostic accuracy of respiratory polygraphy interpretation for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea using a built-in algorithm
    Yacine Touil, Patricia Franco, Aurore Guyon +5
    Sleep MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPhysiologyHAL
  3. AI-Assisted Triage for Diabetic Retinopathy Integrated into Routine Diabetes Care: A Real-World Diagnostic Accuracy Study of the DAIRET® Algorithm
    Alberto Vassallo, Alessio Delfino, Greta Ghizzardi +9
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Fine-tuned Medical Vision-Language Model (MedGemma 1.5 4B) with and without Structured Radiologist Descriptors versus EU-TIRADS for Malignancy Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules at Ultrasound: A Tunisian Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study
    M. N. BOU ALI, N. Lassoued, H. Mahmoud +5
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textMedical imaging & radiologymedRxiv
  5. Fibroma of the Testis and Epididymis: A Case Report on a Testis-Sparing Management Approach
    Vladimer Papava, Valeriane Kvakhajelidze, Giorgi Sinauridze +9
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{ju2026elevated,
  title = {{Elevated human epididymis protein 4 levels in chronic kidney disease compromise the accuracy of the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm}},
  author = {Da-Hye Ju and Se-Won Kim and Sang Wook Yi and Sang-Soo Lee and Woo-Seok Sohn and Young-Jae Lee},
  journal = {Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3892/etm.2026.13338},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13728489},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Elevated human epididymis protein 4 levels in chronic kidney disease compromise the accuracy of the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm
AU  - Da-Hye Ju
AU  - Se-Won Kim
AU  - Sang Wook Yi
AU  - Sang-Soo Lee
AU  - Woo-Seok Sohn
AU  - Young-Jae Lee
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/19
JO  - Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
DO  - 10.3892/etm.2026.13338
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13728489
AB  - The present study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) for differentiating ovarian tumors in patients with and without chronic kidney disease (CKD), using postoperative histopathological findings as the reference standard among patients who underwent surgery after ROMA testing. The retrospective study included 1,122 patients, including 21 with CKD, who met the inclusion criteria and underwent surgery for ovarian tumors at Gangneung Asan Hospital between August 2015 and August 2025. In patients with CKD, human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) levels were elevated in both benign and malignant groups compared with normal levels, with progressively higher levels observed with increasing CKD severity. Among patients with benign ovarian tumors, median HE4 levels were higher in those with CKD than in those without CKD (210.00 vs. 41.10 pmol/l). Cancer antigen 125 (CA125) levels did not differ significantly according to CKD status. Because of the elevated HE4 levels, ROMA scores were significantly higher in patients with CKD, resulting in low specificity {0.200 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.066-0.470]} and reduced overall accuracy [0.429 (95% CI, 0.240-0.640)]. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated superior predictive performance of ROMA in patients without CKD [area under the curve (AUC), 0.724; 95% CI, 0.680-0.768] compared with those with CKD (AUC, 0.467; 95% CI, 0.217-0.717). In conclusion, in patients with CKD and ovarian tumors, ROMA should be interpreted with caution, and CA125 and imaging findings should be considered alongside other clinical information when assessing the risk of ovarian malignancy.
SN  - 1792-0981
SN  - 1792-1015
ER  -