Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Explaining Ground-Motion Residuals at Two Strong-Motion Stations in Southeastern New York: Sediment Resonance and Topographic Amplification

Abstract

Sites hosting strong-motion stations in the Central and Eastern United States are commonly characterized using proxy-based parameters, limiting the ability to identify the physical causes of large ground-motion residuals. This study investigates the amplification mechanisms at two New York strong-motion stations that recorded some of the largest positive 1-Hz pseudospectral-acceleration residuals during the 2024 Mw 4.8 Tewksbury, New Jersey, earthquake. Station N62A is located at Caumsett State Historic Park in the Atlantic Coastal Plain, whereas station PAL is located at the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory atop the Palisades cliffs. Detailed geophysical site characterization at both sites combined active-source and ambient-noise surface-wave testing with HVSR measurements. At Lamont-Doherty, additional ambient-noise arrays were deployed across the Palisades ridge to evaluate topographic amplification. At Caumsett, surface-wave testing resolved a thick sedimentary column overlying a major impedance contrast, with a spatially representative fundamental site frequency of 0.93 Hz. Amplification in the same frequency range was also independently evident in observed amplifications computed from site-to-site (S2S) residuals. The fundamental-resonance band also encompasses the 1-Hz frequency at which the large Tewksbury residual was observed, supporting deep sediment resonance as the dominant mechanism. At Lamont-Doherty, surface-wave testing indicated hard-rock conditions with a thin, laterally variable sediment cover. The ambient-noise arrays showed repeatable, directional amplification near 2 Hz at PAL, and the earthquake-based S2S amplifications show a peak between approximately 0.6 and 2 Hz, a pattern reproduced by neither the transfer functions nor the ergodic linear amplification models. These observations support topographic amplification as the primary mechanism at PAL.

Related

  1. P- and S-Wave Travel-Time Characteristics and Station-Dependent Residuals from Local Earthquakes in Ghana
    Eric Hovor, Anuoluwa Olamide Olatunji, Mutalabi Alhassan +1
    EarthArXivPreprintPublisher termsFull textGeophysics & seismologyEarthArXiv
  2. Observations show increased nitrate in coastal cloud droplet residuals from large-particle activation and N ₂ O ₅ hydrolysis
    Abigail S. Williams, Lynn M. Russell, Sanghee Han +11
    Science AdvancesPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textAtmospheric science & meteorologyCrossrefEurope PMC
  3. Explaining patterns learned by neural networks for detection of atmospheric surface fronts in gridded atmospheric data
    Tim Radke, Johanna Baehr, Marc Rautenhaus
    EGUspherePreprintCC BY 4.0General earth scienceEGUsphere
  4. Insights into Atlantic-Pacific divergence in Arbacia (Echinoidea) using revised systematics of Neogene fossils from the Caribbean and southeastern United States
    Erwan Courville, Rich Mooi, Adam Osborn +3
    Journal of PaleontologyPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textEcologyEvolutionary biologyHAL
  5. Spatial Asymmetry in Topographic Controls on Flood Intensity: A Machine Learning Investigation of the Chi River Floodplain, Thailand
    Nutchanat Buasri, Patiwat Littidej, Benjamabhorn Pumhirunroj +1
    SymmetryPeer-reviewedCC BY7 citedClimate scienceOpenAlex
BibTeX
@misc{abbas2026explaining,
  title = {{Explaining Ground-Motion Residuals at Two Strong-Motion Stations in Southeastern New York: Sediment Resonance and Topographic Amplification}},
  author = {Aser Abbas and Patrick Daniele and James Kaklamanos and Laurie Baise and Kyle Cannon and Ellie Meyer},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.31464},
  eprint = {2609.31464},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31464},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Explaining Ground-Motion Residuals at Two Strong-Motion Stations in Southeastern New York: Sediment Resonance and Topographic Amplification
AU  - Aser Abbas
AU  - Patrick Daniele
AU  - James Kaklamanos
AU  - Laurie Baise
AU  - Kyle Cannon
AU  - Ellie Meyer
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/28
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.31464
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31464
AB  - Sites hosting strong-motion stations in the Central and Eastern United States are commonly characterized using proxy-based parameters, limiting the ability to identify the physical causes of large ground-motion residuals. This study investigates the amplification mechanisms at two New York strong-motion stations that recorded some of the largest positive 1-Hz pseudospectral-acceleration residuals during the 2024 Mw 4.8 Tewksbury, New Jersey, earthquake. Station N62A is located at Caumsett State Historic Park in the Atlantic Coastal Plain, whereas station PAL is located at the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory atop the Palisades cliffs. Detailed geophysical site characterization at both sites combined active-source and ambient-noise surface-wave testing with HVSR measurements. At Lamont-Doherty, additional ambient-noise arrays were deployed across the Palisades ridge to evaluate topographic amplification. At Caumsett, surface-wave testing resolved a thick sedimentary column overlying a major impedance contrast, with a spatially representative fundamental site frequency of 0.93 Hz. Amplification in the same frequency range was also independently evident in observed amplifications computed from site-to-site (S2S) residuals. The fundamental-resonance band also encompasses the 1-Hz frequency at which the large Tewksbury residual was observed, supporting deep sediment resonance as the dominant mechanism. At Lamont-Doherty, surface-wave testing indicated hard-rock conditions with a thin, laterally variable sediment cover. The ambient-noise arrays showed repeatable, directional amplification near 2 Hz at PAL, and the earthquake-based S2S amplifications show a peak between approximately 0.6 and 2 Hz, a pattern reproduced by neither the transfer functions nor the ergodic linear amplification models. These observations support topographic amplification as the primary mechanism at PAL.
ER  -