What comes after social tipping? Perspectives from transitions towards net-zero
- 1Laboratory for Human-Environment Relations in Urban Systems, IIE, ENAC, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- 2Laboratory of Landscape Development, IA, ENAC, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Abstract
The world is on track to exceed 1.5 °C of warming. To avoid further temperature increase, accelerated action to decarbonize our societies is needed. Scholars claim that this transition requires surpassing social tipping points (STPs). STPs are defined as non-linear processes of transformative change in social systems, where a small perturbation triggers a response that generates self-amplifying changes in behaviors. While research efforts have focused on analyzing triggers to tipping, we have little understanding of the structures and mechanisms that stabilize a new state after the tipping phase. We argue that post-tipping trajectories rarely converge to a single stable state. Instead, they converge to multiple coexisting (including reversed) states that can exist as spatial patterns and need to be designed-in for stability. Combining insights from ecological systems, where phenomena that occur after tipping have been researched, with empirical evidence on social tipping in transitions towards net zero, we shed light on states after tipping and on how they may be stabilized. Four phenomena shape post-tipping trajectories: (i) lock-in through co-adoption of technologies or feedback loops; (ii) the co-existence of states; (iii) the reversibility of sustainable behaviors; and (iv) infrastructure as a stabilizer of co-existing or new states. We found that a systemic approach that combines technological and social levers to create positive feedback is needed to stabilize a future state. We propose three policy design principles to achieve this: (1) prioritize infrastructure that creates positive lock-ins to new technologies; (2) combine deep (social norms) and shallow (co-adoption of technologies) levers; and (3) target network brokers to bridge adopter and non-adopter groups and establish diffusion structures.
Related
- Evolutionary transitions in social organization and the relationship between climate and queen number in ant societies
- Integrating epidemiological, regulatory and social perspectives to improve bovine leukemia virus control
- Mentalizing from self and friend perspectives: Relations between inter-brain neural similarity, affective similarity and social anxiety symptoms.
- Frequency-induced Tipping: Resonance-Driven Tipping in a Threshold Predator-Prey System
- Dimensionality-induced critical phase transition in stochastic Lotka-Volterra equation: From statistical averaging to systemic tipping point
BibTeX
@article{binder2026what,
title = {{What comes after social tipping? Perspectives from transitions towards net-zero}},
author = {Claudia R. Binder and Alejandro Gomez and Jair Campfens and Maria Anna Hecher and Simón Ladino Cano and Léonard Léchot and Hanbit Lee and Simon Montfort},
journal = {PLOS Climate},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pclm.0000982},
url = {https://journals.plos.org/climate/article?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000982},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - What comes after social tipping? Perspectives from transitions towards net-zero
AU - Claudia R. Binder
AU - Alejandro Gomez
AU - Jair Campfens
AU - Maria Anna Hecher
AU - Simón Ladino Cano
AU - Léonard Léchot
AU - Hanbit Lee
AU - Simon Montfort
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/30
JO - PLOS Climate
DO - 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000982
UR - https://journals.plos.org/climate/article?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000982
AB - The world is on track to exceed 1.5 °C of warming. To avoid further temperature increase, accelerated action to decarbonize our societies is needed. Scholars claim that this transition requires surpassing social tipping points (STPs). STPs are defined as non-linear processes of transformative change in social systems, where a small perturbation triggers a response that generates self-amplifying changes in behaviors. While research efforts have focused on analyzing triggers to tipping, we have little understanding of the structures and mechanisms that stabilize a new state after the tipping phase. We argue that post-tipping trajectories rarely converge to a single stable state. Instead, they converge to multiple coexisting (including reversed) states that can exist as spatial patterns and need to be designed-in for stability. Combining insights from ecological systems, where phenomena that occur after tipping have been researched, with empirical evidence on social tipping in transitions towards net zero, we shed light on states after tipping and on how they may be stabilized. Four phenomena shape post-tipping trajectories: (i) lock-in through co-adoption of technologies or feedback loops; (ii) the co-existence of states; (iii) the reversibility of sustainable behaviors; and (iv) infrastructure as a stabilizer of co-existing or new states. We found that a systemic approach that combines technological and social levers to create positive feedback is needed to stabilize a future state. We propose three policy design principles to achieve this: (1) prioritize infrastructure that creates positive lock-ins to new technologies; (2) combine deep (social norms) and shallow (co-adoption of technologies) levers; and (3) target network brokers to bridge adopter and non-adopter groups and establish diffusion structures.
SN - 2767-3200
ER -