Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 2 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in Analytical Science

Selective extraction of phenolic compounds from barley waste using deep eutectic solvents

  1. 1Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czechia
  2. 2Department of Food Analysis and Nutrition, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Prague, Czechia

Abstract

In this study, the development of an ultrasound method for extraction of phenolic compounds from barley waste using acidic deep eutectic solvents (UAE-DES) was investigated. Optimization of the extraction parameters, which include extraction time, temperature, and ultrasound power (UP), was performed using the One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) experimental design, followed by HPLC-PDA for determination of total quantified phenolic content (TQPC). In addition, the influence of water addition on TQPC was evaluated. The Maximum TQPC obtained was 5.78 mg/g using ChCl: formic acid at a molar ratio (1:2) and optimal conditions of (70 °C, 30 min, 80% UP, 10% water), and 4.67 mg/g, using ChCl: tartaric acid at a molar ratio (1:2) and optimal conditions of (70 °C, 25 min, 100% UP, and 20% water). The obtained TQPC was 5- and 4-fold higher in comparison with 70% methanol and 70% ethanol extraction. LC–MS-qTOF analysis of DES extracts revealed diverse phenolic compounds, while the concentration range of compounds obtained was as follows: ferulic acid (0.86–2.47 mg/g), catechin (0.12–2.16 mg/g), p-coumaric acid (0.12–0.32 mg/g), naringenin (0.54–0.86 mg/g), and apigenin (0.15–0.91 mg/g). SEM analysis confirmed enhanced accessibility of lignocellulose in DES-treated samples. The sustainability of UAE-DES extraction was assessed using AGREE, AGREEprep, CACI, BAGI, and CaFRI green tools. The grade assessment of each tool resulted in scores: 0.63 for AGREE, 0.57 for AGREEprep, 65 for CACI, 82.5 for BAGI, and 72 for CaFRI, indicating a greener extraction performance of UAE-DES in comparison with 70% methanol and 70% ethanol extraction.

Related

  1. Betaine-Based Deep Eutectic Solvents for Phenolic Compounds Extraction from Vine Shoots: Screening, Optimisation, and Cytotoxicity Assessment.
    Camila C Muñoz-Realpe, Carolina Costa, Ana Rita Jesus +5
    Foods (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textCatalysisEurope PMC
  2. Alternative solvents in liquid chromatography and supercritical fluid chromatography for the separation of phenolic compounds
    Maud Gregson, Magali Batteau, Karine Faure
    Journal of Chromatography APeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full text1 citedAnalytical chemistryHAL
  3. Unveiling the Molecular Driving Forces of Pollutant Extraction by Hydrophobic Eutectic Solvents.
    Sara Gómez, Usman Ali, Alessia Muroni +3
    The journal of physical chemistry. BPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCatalysisEurope PMC
  4. Ultrasound-assisted deep eutectic solvents extraction of bioactive natural products: a sustainable alternative to conventional extraction techniques.
    Sasadhar Majhi, Christian Cravotto, Sivakumar Manickam +1
    Ultrasonics sonochemistryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textCatalysisEurope PMC
  5. Harnessing deep eutectic solvents for the extraction of biomolecules from plant waste: Their industrial applications, optimization, and mechanistic structure
    Onome Ejeromedoghene, Ephraim Akor, Siëda Bont +2
    Next SustainabilityPeer-reviewedCC BY5 citedPhysical chemistryOpenAlex
BibTeX
@article{bradic2026selective,
  title = {{Selective extraction of phenolic compounds from barley waste using deep eutectic solvents}},
  author = {Bojana Bradić and Jakub Dušek and Jan Poustka and Chi Mai Nguyenova and Alina Kalyniukova},
  journal = {Frontiers in Analytical Science},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/frans.2026.1895087},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/frans.2026.1895087},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Selective extraction of phenolic compounds from barley waste using deep eutectic solvents
AU  - Bojana Bradić
AU  - Jakub Dušek
AU  - Jan Poustka
AU  - Chi Mai Nguyenova
AU  - Alina Kalyniukova
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
JO  - Frontiers in Analytical Science
DO  - 10.3389/frans.2026.1895087
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/frans.2026.1895087
AB  - In this study, the development of an ultrasound method for extraction of phenolic compounds from barley waste using acidic deep eutectic solvents (UAE-DES) was investigated. Optimization of the extraction parameters, which include extraction time, temperature, and ultrasound power (UP), was performed using the One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) experimental design, followed by HPLC-PDA for determination of total quantified phenolic content (TQPC). In addition, the influence of water addition on TQPC was evaluated. The Maximum TQPC obtained was 5.78 mg/g using ChCl: formic acid at a molar ratio (1:2) and optimal conditions of (70 °C, 30 min, 80% UP, 10% water), and 4.67 mg/g, using ChCl: tartaric acid at a molar ratio (1:2) and optimal conditions of (70 °C, 25 min, 100% UP, and 20% water). The obtained TQPC was 5- and 4-fold higher in comparison with 70% methanol and 70% ethanol extraction. LC–MS-qTOF analysis of DES extracts revealed diverse phenolic compounds, while the concentration range of compounds obtained was as follows: ferulic acid (0.86–2.47 mg/g), catechin (0.12–2.16 mg/g), p-coumaric acid (0.12–0.32 mg/g), naringenin (0.54–0.86 mg/g), and apigenin (0.15–0.91 mg/g). SEM analysis confirmed enhanced accessibility of lignocellulose in DES-treated samples. The sustainability of UAE-DES extraction was assessed using AGREE, AGREEprep, CACI, BAGI, and CaFRI green tools. The grade assessment of each tool resulted in scores: 0.63 for AGREE, 0.57 for AGREEprep, 65 for CACI, 82.5 for BAGI, and 72 for CaFRI, indicating a greener extraction performance of UAE-DES in comparison with 70% methanol and 70% ethanol extraction.
SN  - 2673-9283
ER  -