Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 40 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences

Managed aquifer recharge in confined multi-layer aquifers: a scalable framework for drought resilience in central Europe

  1. 1Technische Universität Berlin (Berlin, Germany)
  2. 2Zagazig University (Zagazig, Egypt)

Abstract

Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR), particularly Aquifer Storage, Transfer and Recovery (ASTR), can enhance groundwater resilience in confined multi-layer aquifers under drought stress. We develop an integrated and scalable framework to assess ASTR feasibility by combining (i) meteorological and groundwater drought analysis using the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) and Standardized Groundwater Index (SGI), (ii) GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) for recharge site suitability, and (iii) dynamic assessment of surface-water availability using ecological flow thresholds. Applied to the water-stressed Berlin-Brandenburg region, one of Germany's driest areas, where water supply relies heavily on induced bank filtration and faces emerging deficits. Results show that groundwater levels respond to climatic variability, supporting climate- informed ASTR planning. The MCDA identified 62.8 % of the area (2154 km ² ) as viable for ASTR. Flow-threshold analysis at 27 gauges showed that specific high-potential downstream sites could provide mean annual recharge volumes of 1.6–4.3 Mm ³ , offsetting 6 %–79 % of local extractions at those locations, although these volumes decreased substantially (40 %–100 %) during severe drought years (e.g., 2018), highlighting the importance of capturing wet-period surpluses for reliable ASTR operation. At the catchment scale, total mean annual available recharge is 18.2–23.0 Mm ³ . Literature-based cost estimates (EUR 0.30–0.60 m ⁻³ ) are substantially lower than regional drinking-water production costs (EUR 1.80 m ⁻³ ), suggesting potential for substantial cost savings relative to conventional water supply, though precise economic benefits require site-specific validation.

Versions

Related

  1. Development of a MOORA multi-criteria decision-making framework to reduce chloride concentrations in urban aquifers using MT3DMS groundwater transport modelling
    Iraj Saeedpanah, Farshid Alizadeh
    Applied Water SciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionDOAJ
  2. Groundwater recharge sources and flow systems in the Matsumoto Basin, Japan: Insights from ⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Sr isotopes, δ¹⁸O, δ²H, and hydrochemistry
    Shiho Yabusaki
    GEOCHEMICAL JOURNALPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textGeology & geochemistryJ-STAGE
  3. Experimental investigation of ground fissure reactivation and differential deformation under layered groundwater pumping–recharge conditions
    Feilong Chen, Weiguang Yang, Cong Li +4
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionCrossref
  4. Final step of the 32-year Lake Nyos degassing adventure: Natural CO2 recharge is to be balanced by discharge through the degassing pipes
    Michel Halbwachs, Jean-Christophe Sabroux, Gaston Kayser
    Journal of African Earth SciencesPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text21 citedEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  5. When does back-diffusion from low-permeability porous media into aquifers create isotope fractionation?
    Patrick Höhener, Maria Prieto-Espinoza, Asma Ben Salem +3
    Journal of Contaminant HydrologyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textGeneral chemistryEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
BibTeX
@article{abdelrahman2026managed,
  title = {{Managed aquifer recharge in confined multi-layer aquifers: a scalable framework for drought resilience in central Europe}},
  author = {Abdelrahman Ahmed Ali Abdelrahman and Hagen Koch and Mobarok Hossain and Ronjon Heim and Clara Hauke and Irina Engelhardt},
  journal = {Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.5194/nhess-26-4641-2026},
  url = {https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/26/4641/2026/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Managed aquifer recharge in confined multi-layer aquifers: a scalable framework for drought resilience in central Europe
AU  - Abdelrahman Ahmed Ali Abdelrahman
AU  - Hagen Koch
AU  - Mobarok Hossain
AU  - Ronjon Heim
AU  - Clara Hauke
AU  - Irina Engelhardt
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
JO  - Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
DO  - 10.5194/nhess-26-4641-2026
UR  - https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/26/4641/2026/
AB  - Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR), particularly Aquifer Storage, Transfer and Recovery (ASTR), can enhance groundwater resilience in confined multi-layer aquifers under drought stress. We develop an integrated and scalable framework to assess ASTR feasibility by combining (i) meteorological and groundwater drought analysis using the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) and Standardized Groundwater Index (SGI), (ii) GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) for recharge site suitability, and (iii) dynamic assessment of surface-water availability using ecological flow thresholds. Applied to the water-stressed Berlin-Brandenburg region, one of Germany's driest areas, where water supply relies heavily on induced bank filtration and faces emerging deficits. Results show that groundwater levels respond to climatic variability, supporting climate- informed ASTR planning. The MCDA identified 62.8 % of the area (2154 km ² ) as viable for ASTR. Flow-threshold analysis at 27 gauges showed that specific high-potential downstream sites could provide mean annual recharge volumes of 1.6–4.3 Mm ³ , offsetting 6 %–79 % of local extractions at those locations, although these volumes decreased substantially (40 %–100 %) during severe drought years (e.g., 2018), highlighting the importance of capturing wet-period surpluses for reliable ASTR operation. At the catchment scale, total mean annual available recharge is 18.2–23.0 Mm ³ . Literature-based cost estimates (EUR 0.30–0.60 m ⁻³ ) are substantially lower than regional drinking-water production costs (EUR 1.80 m ⁻³ ), suggesting potential for substantial cost savings relative to conventional water supply, though precise economic benefits require site-specific validation.
SN  - 1684-9981
ER  -